U.S. court puts on hold Calif. same-sex marriage until Dec.

0 CommentsPrint E-mail Xinhua, August 17, 2010
Adjust font size:

A federal appeals court put on hold Monday the Proposition 8 regarding same-sex marriage in California until at least December when it considers broader constitutional questions.

A three-judge panel of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals said in a brief order that it would hold a hearing in early December on whether it would even hear an appeal of a judge's ruling striking down Proposition 8, the voter-approved measure that banned same-sex marriage in the state.

U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker in San Francisco ruled on Aug. 4 that Proposition 8, which was approved by California voters in 2008, violated the 14th Amendment that guarantees equal protection to all Americans.

He put a stay on the ruling and, with opponents of same-sex marriage arguing that weddings should not be permitted until the case is heard by appellate courts to avoid confusion, he ruled last week that the stay should be lifted at 5 p.m. Wednesday, pending any intervention by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.

Attorneys for ProtectMarriage.com appealed Walker's decision and requested that a stay remain in effect until the appeal is heard.

The appellate panel indicated on Monday it wants to hear arguments about whether ProtectMarriage.com has legal standing to pursue the appeal at a hearing held during the week of Dec. 6 in San Francisco.

It ordered both sides to present arguments on whether the campaign for Proposition 8 has legal authority to appeal Walker's order. Until that hearing, same-sex marriages will remain on hold.

California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger and Attorney General Jerry Brown, both as the original defendants in the lawsuit, have declined to appeal the case.

California voters approved Proposition 22, which specified in state law that only marriages between a man and a woman are valid in California in March 2000. Eighty years later, the state Supreme Court ruled the law was unconstitutional because it discriminated against gays, and an estimated 18,000 same-sex couples got married in the ensuing months.

Opponents of same-sex marriage quickly got Proposition 8 on the November 2008 ballot to amend the state constitution, and it was approved by a margin of 52.5 percent to 47.5 percent. The approval led to statewide protests and lawsuits challenging the legality of Proposition 8.

In May 2009, the California Supreme Court upheld Proposition 8, but also ruled that the unions of roughly 18,000 same-sex couples who were wed in 2008 would remain valid.

Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comments

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 中文字幕亚洲天堂| 亚洲乱码一区二区三区在线观看| 色婷婷综合久久久久中文一区二区 | 在线中文字幕网站| www久久只有这里有精品| 手机看片日韩福利| 久久久久无码精品国产H动漫| 最新国产精品精品视频| 亚洲国产精品无码久久久蜜芽| 看久久久久久a级毛片| 午夜精品视频5000| 翁熄系列回乡下| 国产三级精品三级在专区| 黄床大片30分钟免费看| 国产欧美精品一区二区色综合| 182tv成人午夜在线观看| 国内自产少妇自拍区免费| a级男女仿爱免费视频| 妖精色av无码国产在线看| 一级做a爰片久久毛片图片| 成人黄色免费网址| 中文字幕精品无码亚洲字| 日产精品卡一卡2卡三卡乱码工厂 日产精品卡二卡三卡四卡乱码视频 | 久久综合网欧美色妞网| 模特侨依琳大尺度流出| 亚洲午夜国产精品无码 | 深爱五月激情网| 国产精品成熟老女人视频| 8x8x华人永久免费视频| 国内午夜免费鲁丝片| 99久久99热精品免费观看国产| 天堂8在线天堂资源8| chinese体育生gayxxxxhd| 奇米在线777| jlzzjlzz亚洲乱熟无码| 奇米影视中文字幕| chinese国产xxxx中国| 大胸姐妹在线观看| av无码东京热亚洲男人的天堂| 天天爽夜夜爽夜夜爽| jizzjizz护士|