California gay marriage trial closes

0 CommentsPrint E-mail Xinhua via Agencies, June 17, 2010
Adjust font size:

The historic trial over same-sex marriage in California ends on Wednesday, with the case now in the hands of Judge Vaughn Walker, according to media reports.

Walker is being asked to decide whether California voters violated the U.S. Constitution's guarantees of due process and equal protection when they passed a referendum in November 2008 to amend the state constitution, defining marriage as between a man and a woman.

Attorney Charles Cooper, arguing on behalf of Proposition 8 backers, maintained that society is entitled to reserve its approval of marriage for those who can naturally conceive children.

"The marital relationship is fundamental to the existence and survival of the race," Cooper said in closing arguments before a packed San Francisco courtroom.

The reason the state regulates marriage, he said, is to steer "procreative sexual relationships" into a stable family environment so that children can be raised by their biological parents.

Cooper's counterpart, former U.S. solicitor general Theodore B. Olson, told Walker that the times called for boldness.

Representing two same-sex couples who want to marry, Olson invoked groundbreaking Supreme Court civil rights decisions, such as Brown v. Board of Education, which forbade racial segregation in public schools, and Loving v. Virginia, which threw out that state's law against interracial marriage.

"Proposition 8 discriminates on the basis of sex the same as Virginia law discriminated on the basis of race," Olson said.

The case is likely headed for the U.S. Supreme Court no matter how District Court Chief Judge Vaughn Walker rules on the ban. A decision there could determine the fate of same-sex marriage in the United States for years.

California voters approved the ban known as Prop 8 in 2008, dismaying gay advocates and their allies who had hoped the trend-setting state would side with them.

However U.S. voters in state referendums across the nation have consistently opposed same-sex marriage. It is legal in only five states and the District of Columbia due to court and legislative action.

Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comments

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 欧美xxxx做受欧美| 精品一区二区三区AV天堂| 国产精品无码无在线观看| 六月丁香综合网| 青青国产精品视频| 嫩BBB槡BBBB槡BBBB| 亚洲人成影院在线高清| 猫咪av成人永久网站在线观看| 国产成人精品免费视频大全麻豆| 91极品在线观看| 天天躁日日躁狠狠躁中文字幕| 中文字幕免费在线看线人动作大片| 日韩一区二区三区精品| 亚洲av无码久久寂寞少妇| 欧美理论片在线| 亚洲色婷婷一区二区三区| 精品一区二区三区在线观看| 国产v片成人影院在线观看| 韩国免费高清一级毛片性色| 国产日韩一区二区三区在线播放| 18禁美女裸体网站无遮挡| 国内精品一区二区三区最新| a级高清观看视频在线看| 小时代1免费观看完整版| 中文字幕天天躁日日躁狠狠躁免费| 日本精品a在线| 久久精品中文字幕无码| 日韩高清国产一区在线| 亚洲色成人WWW永久网站| 精品一区二区三区免费视频 | 欧美日韩国产在线观看一区二区三区| 任你躁国产自任一区二区三区| 粗喘撞吟np文古代| 出差被绝伦上司侵犯中文字幕| 精品综合久久久久久888蜜芽| 国产123区在线视频观看| 色婷婷精品视频| 国产特级毛片aaaaaaa高清| 18到20岁女人一级毛片| 国产精品自拍亚洲| 18岁日韩内射颜射午夜久久成人|