California gay marriage trial closes

0 CommentsPrint E-mail Xinhua via Agencies, June 17, 2010
Adjust font size:

The historic trial over same-sex marriage in California ends on Wednesday, with the case now in the hands of Judge Vaughn Walker, according to media reports.

Walker is being asked to decide whether California voters violated the U.S. Constitution's guarantees of due process and equal protection when they passed a referendum in November 2008 to amend the state constitution, defining marriage as between a man and a woman.

Attorney Charles Cooper, arguing on behalf of Proposition 8 backers, maintained that society is entitled to reserve its approval of marriage for those who can naturally conceive children.

"The marital relationship is fundamental to the existence and survival of the race," Cooper said in closing arguments before a packed San Francisco courtroom.

The reason the state regulates marriage, he said, is to steer "procreative sexual relationships" into a stable family environment so that children can be raised by their biological parents.

Cooper's counterpart, former U.S. solicitor general Theodore B. Olson, told Walker that the times called for boldness.

Representing two same-sex couples who want to marry, Olson invoked groundbreaking Supreme Court civil rights decisions, such as Brown v. Board of Education, which forbade racial segregation in public schools, and Loving v. Virginia, which threw out that state's law against interracial marriage.

"Proposition 8 discriminates on the basis of sex the same as Virginia law discriminated on the basis of race," Olson said.

The case is likely headed for the U.S. Supreme Court no matter how District Court Chief Judge Vaughn Walker rules on the ban. A decision there could determine the fate of same-sex marriage in the United States for years.

California voters approved the ban known as Prop 8 in 2008, dismaying gay advocates and their allies who had hoped the trend-setting state would side with them.

However U.S. voters in state referendums across the nation have consistently opposed same-sex marriage. It is legal in only five states and the District of Columbia due to court and legislative action.

Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comments

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 久久香蕉国产视频| 人人爽人人爽人人爽人人片av | 免费成人福利视频| 色香蕉在线观看| 国产毛片久久久久久国产毛片| 97久久国产亚洲精品超碰热 | 精品久久久久国产| 囯产精品一品二区三区| 久久久国产视频| 欧美11一12周岁a在线观看| 亚洲欧美性另类春色| 特黄熟妇丰满人妻无码| 免费看国产精品麻豆| 美女被免费视频网站| 国产亚洲成av人片在线观黄桃| 黄页网址免费大全观看| 国产精品538一区二区在线| 2020国产在线| 国产色产综合色产在线观看视频| a√天堂中文在线最新版| 娇小老少配xxxxx丶| 一级毛片免费毛片毛片| 成人综合婷婷国产精品久久蜜臀| 久久国产精品99精品国产| 日韩在线看片免费人成视频播放| 亚洲av女人18毛片水真多| 欧美va亚洲va香蕉在线| 亚洲国产高清视频在线观看| 美女把腿扒开让男人桶免费 | 日本精品啪啪一区二区三区| 亚洲黄色免费在线观看| 福利片免费一区二区三区| 动漫精品动漫一区三区3d| 网址你懂的在线观看| 国产欧美久久一区二区三区 | 日本按摩高潮a级中文片| 久久精品国内一区二区三区| 最新国产精品拍自在线播放| 亚洲AV无码专区在线亚| 激情视频在线观看网站| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲五月天|