California gay marriage trial closes

0 CommentsPrint E-mail Xinhua via Agencies, June 17, 2010
Adjust font size:

The historic trial over same-sex marriage in California ends on Wednesday, with the case now in the hands of Judge Vaughn Walker, according to media reports.

Walker is being asked to decide whether California voters violated the U.S. Constitution's guarantees of due process and equal protection when they passed a referendum in November 2008 to amend the state constitution, defining marriage as between a man and a woman.

Attorney Charles Cooper, arguing on behalf of Proposition 8 backers, maintained that society is entitled to reserve its approval of marriage for those who can naturally conceive children.

"The marital relationship is fundamental to the existence and survival of the race," Cooper said in closing arguments before a packed San Francisco courtroom.

The reason the state regulates marriage, he said, is to steer "procreative sexual relationships" into a stable family environment so that children can be raised by their biological parents.

Cooper's counterpart, former U.S. solicitor general Theodore B. Olson, told Walker that the times called for boldness.

Representing two same-sex couples who want to marry, Olson invoked groundbreaking Supreme Court civil rights decisions, such as Brown v. Board of Education, which forbade racial segregation in public schools, and Loving v. Virginia, which threw out that state's law against interracial marriage.

"Proposition 8 discriminates on the basis of sex the same as Virginia law discriminated on the basis of race," Olson said.

The case is likely headed for the U.S. Supreme Court no matter how District Court Chief Judge Vaughn Walker rules on the ban. A decision there could determine the fate of same-sex marriage in the United States for years.

California voters approved the ban known as Prop 8 in 2008, dismaying gay advocates and their allies who had hoped the trend-setting state would side with them.

However U.S. voters in state referendums across the nation have consistently opposed same-sex marriage. It is legal in only five states and the District of Columbia due to court and legislative action.

Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comments

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 日本大片免a费观看视频| 特黄一级**毛片| 国产成人免费观看| 911色主站性欧美| 天天操天天干天天透| 公侵犯玩弄漂亮人妻优| 请与我同眠未删减未遮挡小说| 国产粉嫩嫩00在线正在播放| 91蜜桃传媒一二三区| 天天做天天爱天天一爽一毛片| 三级毛片在线免费观看| 日本19禁啪啪无遮挡免费动图 | 中文在线观看www| 日本天堂视频在线观看| 亚洲综合色视频在线观看| 精品无人区无码乱码毛片国产| 国产一区二区三区视频在线观看| 麻豆国产高清精品国在线| 国产欧美日韩中文久久| 亚洲精品aaa| 国产精品乱码在线观看| 777精品视频| 国产色视频免费| 91福利视频网| 在线观看免费视频资源| 9久久免费国产精品特黄| 日本www在线播放| 久久大香伊蕉在人线国产h| 日韩精品免费视频| 亚洲av成人无码久久精品老人| 欧美乱大交xxxxx免费| 亚洲国产成人久久综合区| 欧美日韩加勒比一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美日韩自偷自拍| 污视频网站免费| 亚洲爱情岛论坛| 欧美肥妇毛多水多bbxx水蜜桃| 亚洲精品你懂的| 欧美综合天天夜夜久久| 亚洲欧美日韩精品久久亚洲区色播 | 国产性夜夜春夜夜爽三级|