Home / Living in China / What's New Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read | Comment
Sex discrimination on the silver screen
Adjust font size:

In 1928, at the first Academy Awards, there were 15 categories. Men won in 14 of them, but Janet Gaynor managed to sneak away with the award for best actress.

Given that it was only eight years since women had won the right to vote, one could argue that liberal Hollywood was being progressive in its recognition that women were occasionally appearing in movies, too.

After 80 years, we have naturally advanced since the days when women won only 6 percent of Hollywood's most coveted awards. Today, they direct only 6 percent of all Hollywood films. Of the 24 "regular categories" of Oscars, women have also been eligible to win best supporting actress since 1936.

Costume design was added in 1948, and makeup in 1981, both arenas in which women excel, for obvious reasons: We are skilled at being pretty, and we like to make other people pretty, too.

This is why beautiful women pretending to be ugly, or men, have such a high statistical probability of winning best actress: It takes real virtuosity to overcome our biological urge to ornament.

A woman has never won best director, and only six women have ever won best picture (all of which were shared with male co-producers). We do all right with screenplays, as women have been graciously permitted to write for a couple of centuries now.

Although supposedly we no longer believe that separate is the same as equal, we still segregate entertainment awards along gender lines.

When it comes to sex, apartheid is invisible; the Oscar for leading performance by a person who is female is hotly anticipated, although it is not, of course, as important as the Oscar for leading performance by a person who is male, as Sunday night's show demonstrated.

The best actress category persists because we would not want to risk the possibility that no women would win an Oscar.

The problem is that awards which do not segregate on the basis of gender tend to overlook women altogether. There is no Nobel prize for women's literature: women go head to head with men. And they have won 10 times in 107 years.

Women do badly in awards in which attractiveness does not count, which is why they are so under-represented among producers, directors and Nobel laureates. By the same token, beautiful women on display are used to sell everything in our culture, and the Oscars are no exception.

The author is a senior lecturer at the University of East Anglia The Guardian

(The Guardian via China Daily February 28, 2008)

Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read
Comment
Pet Name
Anonymous
China Archives
Related >>
- Bank Sex Discrimination Case to Continue
- Music hall accused of discrimination
- No discrimination in civil servant test: personnel official
- Law targets work discrimination
- List of 'unfit jobs' to ward off discrimination
- Law targets work discrimination
Most Viewed >>
- Where to get coffee
- How to keep it kosher
- Color bursts out for spring
- A Brief Introduction of Chinese Visa and the Procedure for Visa Application
- Visa Fee and Processing Time
主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产成人精品无码播放| 2021久久精品国产99国产精品| 波多野结衣绝顶大高潮| 四虎精品影院在线观看视频 | 99久久国产宗和精品1上映| 少妇高潮太爽了在线观看| 久久99精品国产麻豆宅宅| 日韩在线视频第一页| 亚洲av无码成人精品区狼人影院| 清纯女神被老头耸动| 免费看美女扒开腿让男人桶| 美腿丝袜中文字幕| 国产一卡2卡3卡四卡高清 | 少妇愉情理伦片高潮日本| 中文精品久久久久人妻不卡| 日韩欧美成人乱码一在线| 亚洲avav天堂av在线网爱情| 欧美在线观看第一页| 亚洲日本乱码一区二区在线二产线| 波多野结衣女教师在线观看| 俄罗斯激情女同互慰在线| 精品人妻无码专区在中文字幕| 台湾swag在线观看| 老司机午夜性生免费福利| 国产xxxxx| 色综合网站国产麻豆| 国产乱子伦露脸在线| 青青草在视线频久久| 国产国语高清在线视频二区| 龙珠全彩里番acg同人本子| 国产精品免费久久久久影院 | 黄色福利视频网站| 国产欧美视频在线| 亚洲欧美校园春色| 国产猛男猛女超爽免费视频| 亚洲视频一区二区三区四区| 国产精品99久久久久久董美香| xxxx中文字幕| 国产精品999| 欧美丝袜一区二区三区| 国产欧美一区二区精品久久久|