Home / Living in China / What's New Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read | Comment
Sex discrimination on the silver screen
Adjust font size:

In 1928, at the first Academy Awards, there were 15 categories. Men won in 14 of them, but Janet Gaynor managed to sneak away with the award for best actress.

Given that it was only eight years since women had won the right to vote, one could argue that liberal Hollywood was being progressive in its recognition that women were occasionally appearing in movies, too.

After 80 years, we have naturally advanced since the days when women won only 6 percent of Hollywood's most coveted awards. Today, they direct only 6 percent of all Hollywood films. Of the 24 "regular categories" of Oscars, women have also been eligible to win best supporting actress since 1936.

Costume design was added in 1948, and makeup in 1981, both arenas in which women excel, for obvious reasons: We are skilled at being pretty, and we like to make other people pretty, too.

This is why beautiful women pretending to be ugly, or men, have such a high statistical probability of winning best actress: It takes real virtuosity to overcome our biological urge to ornament.

A woman has never won best director, and only six women have ever won best picture (all of which were shared with male co-producers). We do all right with screenplays, as women have been graciously permitted to write for a couple of centuries now.

Although supposedly we no longer believe that separate is the same as equal, we still segregate entertainment awards along gender lines.

When it comes to sex, apartheid is invisible; the Oscar for leading performance by a person who is female is hotly anticipated, although it is not, of course, as important as the Oscar for leading performance by a person who is male, as Sunday night's show demonstrated.

The best actress category persists because we would not want to risk the possibility that no women would win an Oscar.

The problem is that awards which do not segregate on the basis of gender tend to overlook women altogether. There is no Nobel prize for women's literature: women go head to head with men. And they have won 10 times in 107 years.

Women do badly in awards in which attractiveness does not count, which is why they are so under-represented among producers, directors and Nobel laureates. By the same token, beautiful women on display are used to sell everything in our culture, and the Oscars are no exception.

The author is a senior lecturer at the University of East Anglia The Guardian

(The Guardian via China Daily February 28, 2008)

Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read
Comment
Pet Name
Anonymous
China Archives
Related >>
- Bank Sex Discrimination Case to Continue
- Music hall accused of discrimination
- No discrimination in civil servant test: personnel official
- Law targets work discrimination
- List of 'unfit jobs' to ward off discrimination
- Law targets work discrimination
Most Viewed >>
- Where to get coffee
- How to keep it kosher
- Color bursts out for spring
- A Brief Introduction of Chinese Visa and the Procedure for Visa Application
- Visa Fee and Processing Time
主站蜘蛛池模板: 精品国产麻豆免费网站| 又大又硬又爽又粗又快的视频免费| 色综合色综合色综合色综合网| 国产精品多p对白交换绿帽| videofree极品另类| 成年女人18级毛片毛片免费观看| 久久精品人人做人人爽电影蜜月| 欧美大香线蕉线伊人久久| 免费a在线观看| 精品无码av一区二区三区| 国产三级小视频| 黑人巨茎大战欧美白妇免费| 国产精品午夜爆乳美女视频| 99热99re8国产在线播放| 小兔子被蛇用两根是什么小说| 中文字幕乱伦视频| 日本三级欧美三级| 久久看免费视频| 最近免费中文字幕大全免费版视频| 亚洲国产综合在线| 每日更新在线观看av| 人妻少妇AV中文字幕乱码| 精品国产三级v| 啊~嗯~轻点~啊~用力村妇| 萌白酱在线17分钟喷水视频| 国产在线a免费观看| 成人在线免费看片| 国产男女猛烈无遮挡免费视频 | caopon在线| 好男人www社区| 一本久到久久亚洲综合| 成人小视频在线观看| 中文字幕人妻高清乱码| 新梅金瓶2之爱奴国语| 久久久久久亚洲av无码专区| 日本卡一卡二新区| 久久午夜宫电影网| 日韩女同互慰专区| 久久综合丝袜长腿丝袜| 晓青老师的丝袜系列txt下载| 五月婷婷六月天|