Home / International / Opinion Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read | Comment
US and Japan Must Admit Iraq War a Mistake
Adjust font size:

By Yzuru Nakagawa

We didn't need Defense Minister Fumio Kyuma's comment to realize that the Iraq War was clearly a mistake. An Asahi Shimbun public opinion poll shows that most people also think so.

How did the mistake start?

As former UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan pointed out, there is no doubt it goes back to the illegality of the start of the war four years ago.

In countries ruled by law, it is a matter of course for authorities to take out a court-issued warrant before they conduct an investigation. By the same token, in international society, if countries want to use force against others, they are required to seek a resolution passed by the UN Security Council.

The UN Charter allows members to use force only when they meet formal procedures set by the Security Council.

What the United States did to start the Iraq War can be likened to the police conducting a criminal investigation, not with a proper warrant but with one it previously obtained for a related case. This is clearly against the law.

Just before the outbreak of the war, then US Secretary of State Colin Powell made reference to Security Council Resolution 1441 passed in November 2002 as legal grounds to attack Iraq.

The resolution was aimed at offering Iraq "a final opportunity" to dismantle its weapons of mass destruction. The governments of both Japan and the United States have admitted that the resolution does not automatically allow the use of force against Iraq.

Rather, the Japanese government appears to base its reasoning on Resolution 687, passed in 1991 to end the Gulf War triggered by the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait. The resolution partially left in place economic sanctions from the Gulf War to pressure Iraq into removing weapons of mass destruction.

If that was the case, the resolution to allow the use of force in the Gulf War must still be effective. This seems to be Tokyo's reasoning in its defense of the Iraq War.
?
But there is no way a series of resolutions demanding that Iraq withdraw from Kuwait would still be in effect after the Gulf War.

Since the United States was aware of the flimsiness of its argument, it sought to have the Security Council pass a new resolution. But the moment it gave up the effort, it made the decision to trample the rule of law. International society was powerless before the unlawful behavior of the world's only superpower. Sadly, this is a reality of the 21st century.

As the saying goes, where might is master, justice is servant. But it doesn't mean we should sit back and do nothing. If we do, the world will become distorted.

This lack of reason reminds us of former Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi's irrational statement: "Just because we cannot find Saddam Hussein, it doesn't mean he doesn't exist. Therefore, we cannot say that there are no weapons of mass destruction."

The situation is even having a serious impact on education. When a senior high school textbook to be introduced this spring stated that the Iraq War was "a first strike" by the United States, the publisher was ordered by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology to rewrite the entry. This is because "first strike means an act of aggression banned by international law," according to the ministry.

It shows that as long as the government stands by the argument that starting the Iraq War was just, it has no choice but to cover up lies with lies.

Anyone who breaks the law must be punished. This is common sense. Some may see the way Americans are struggling to get out of the Iraqi quagmire as punishment. As long as the status quo continues, it is unlikely that the United States will win the Iraqi people's understanding.

Why don't Washington and Tokyo, which has been supporting Washington, both admit, albeit belatedly, that starting the Iraq War was a grave mistake?

It is true that such an admission involves major political difficulties. But once they overcome the difficulties, a new path awaits them.

The author is professor of international journalism at Tezukayamagakuin University.
?
(China Daily via The Asahi Shimbun April 20, 2007)

Tools: Save | Print | E-mail | Most Read
Comment
Pet Name
Anonymous
China Archives
Related >>
- Japan Announces Iraq Troop Pullout
- Japan to Extend Air Mission in Iraq
- A Trip for Coordination of US-Japan Ties
- US Senate Demands Troop Withdrawal
- US Strategic Retreat Could Encourage Globalism
- Six US Soldiers Killed in Iraq
- Iraqis Rally, Call for US Withdrawal
- US Extends Duty Tours for Army Troops in Iraq, Afghanistan
- Iraq's Sadr Bloc Withdraws from Government
-
Most Viewed >>
> Korean Nuclear Talks
> Reconstruction of Iraq
> Middle East Peace Process
> Iran Nuclear Issue
> 6th SCO Summit Meeting
Links
- China Development Gateway
- Foreign Ministry
- Network of East Asian Think-Tanks
- China-EU Association
- China-Africa Business Council
- China Foreign Affairs University
- University of International Relations
- Institute of World Economics & Politics
- Institute of Russian, East European & Central Asian Studies
- Institute of West Asian & African Studies
- Institute of Latin American Studies
- Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies
- Institute of Japanese Studies
主站蜘蛛池模板: 青青草国产精品视频| 哦┅┅快┅┅用力啊┅┅动态图 | 国产精品视频一区二区三区四| 久久九九久精品国产免费直播 | 日本强好片久久久久久aaa | 色偷偷亚洲女人天堂观看欧| 国产在线精品香蕉麻豆| bbw巨大丰满xxxx| 日本老熟妇xxxxx| 亚洲欧美日韩综合久久久| 精品国产一区二区三区香蕉| 国产一区二区三区精品久久呦 | 色偷偷亚洲男人天堂| 国产人妖在线视频| 91精品国产一区| 成人国产经典视频在线观看| 亚洲videos| 激情啪啪精品一区二区| 国产一区二区三区视频| 韩国女友的妈妈| 国产成人免费网站app下载 | 李老汉别揉我奶了嗯啊h| 亚洲国产精品久久丫| 精品一区二区三区在线观看视频| 国产成人亚洲综合| 亚洲乱码一二三四区乱码| 国产精品嫩草影院人体模特| 一二三四免费观看在线电影中文| 成人深夜视频在线观看| 五月婷婷丁香色| 欧美一级做一级做片性十三| 先锋影音av资源网| 高清欧美性猛交xxxx黑人猛交| 国产欧美日韩视频在线观看一区二区 | 女皇跪趴受辱娇躯| 久久久久国产精品免费网站| 欧美日韩精品一区二区三区高清视频| 亚洲美女视频网站| 精品视频在线观看一区二区三区| 国产大学生粉嫩无套流白浆| 2021久久精品国产99国产精品|