COVID-19 lab leak theory doesn't hold up to scientific scrutiny, says virologist

0 Comment(s)Print E-mail Xinhua, August 10, 2021
Adjust font size:
People wait for a bus near an advertising board promoting the UK Government's vaccine program in Bedford, Britain, on May 19, 2021. [Photo/Xinhua]

There is no evidence that SARS-CoV-2, the novel coronavirus behind the COVID-19 pandemic, was created in a lab, and none of the lab leak claims "hold up to scientific scrutiny," a virologist with the University of Glasgow has said.

The lab leak theory "offers no evidence other than the circumstantial location of the Wuhan Institute of Virology," which is located in Wuhan, central China's Hubei Province, David Robertson, head of viral genomics and bioinformatics of the Scottish university, told Xinhua in an email interview recently.

"Currently, all of the data points strongly in one direction, and that's toward a natural virus, not one created in a lab," Robertson said. "We need to trust in the evidence and the experts who have experience of virus evolution and emergence."

The virologist also said it is "far too divergent" for RaTG13, a coronavirus detected in horseshoe bats in southwest China's Yunnan Province in 2013, to be the progenitor of SARS-CoV-2 that caused the first human cases, as the two viruses differ in about 1,100 nucleotide positions.

"That the closest bat viruses to SARS-CoV-2 are found in Yunnan is misleading as there's a massive under-sampling issue and although these bat viruses are genetically close this still represents decades of time," argued Robertson, stressing that there are "a lot of these types of viruses circulating in nature."

Robertson pointed out that the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 looks very similar to the first SARS emergence, with genetic relatedness to viruses found in horseshoe bats and a strong association with animal markets. "We just haven't as yet identified the intermediate animal species for SARS-CoV-2 that facilitated the transmission from bats to humans," he added.

Robertson was among 21 eminent scientists from universities and research institutes around the world who have warned that a focus on a highly improbable lab origin of COVID-19 is distracting from scientific tasks to comprehensively investigate the zoonotic origin.

The scientists, in a review paper on the origins of SARS-CoV-2 published in July as a pre-print on Zenodo, an open-access repository, wrote that there currently exists zero evidence that the virus originated from a lab and that "there is no evidence that any early cases had any connection to the Wuhan Institute of Virology."

Commenting on the renewed interest on the lab leak theory in the United States over the past few months, he said "it's really hard to understand how this happened, there was no new data presented."

"I'd say the main one is it stops being science anymore," Robertson noted. "Science at its core can't be about opinion, it has to (be) evidence based."

Follow China.org.cn on Twitter and Facebook to join the conversation.
ChinaNews App Download
Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Enter the words you see:   
    Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 精品一区二区三区3d动漫| 国产成人yy免费视频| 少妇高潮太爽了在线观看| 久久人人爽人人爽人人爽| 欧美一区二区三区在观看| 亚洲熟妇少妇任你躁在线观看| ass日本乱妇bbw| 成年女人18级毛片毛片免费观看| 久久香蕉国产视频| 欧美变态另类刺激| 亚洲欧美日韩一区二区三区在线 | 欧美日韩国产三上悠亚在线看| 免费99精品国产自在现线| 精品无码三级在线观看视频| 国产三级日产三级韩国三级韩级| 好吊色永久免费视频大全| 国产精品久久久久无码av| 26uuu另类亚洲欧美日本| 国产黄大片在线观看| 99视频精品全部在线播放| 好吊妞乱淫欧美| 两人夜晚打扑克剧烈运动| 无人高清视频免费观看在线动漫| 久久午夜无码鲁丝片午夜精品 | 亚洲午夜无码久久久久小说| 美女被免费视频网站a国产| 国产传媒在线观看| a级亚洲片精品久久久久久久| 年轻的嫂子在线线观免费观看| 中文精品久久久久人妻| 日日碰狠狠添天天爽超碰97| 久久天天躁狠狠躁夜夜2020一| 日韩精品无码一本二本三本色| 亚洲av无码久久寂寞少妇| 欧洲多毛裸体xxxxx| 亚洲乱码一二三四区乱码| 欧美人妻精品一区二区三区| 亚洲国产精品日韩专区av| 欧美日韩一区二区不卡三区| 亚洲日本久久一区二区va| 欧美日韩亚洲国产精品一区二区|