Debates on WikiLeaks disclosures get hotter in U.S.

 
0 CommentsPrint E-mail Xinhua, December 2, 2010
Adjust font size:

Disclosures of confidential U.S. government documents have stimulated a hot debate in the United States. Are they acts of espionage, terrorism, or journalism? Do media have the right to release those documents? And who is to blame?

Don't miss 

A senior U.S. defense official disclosed that U.S. Justice, State and Defense Department lawyers are discussing whether it might be possible to prosecute Julian Assange, the WikiLeaks founder, and others under the Espionage Act.

U.S. Congressman Peter King of New York called for Assange to be charged under the Espionage Act and asked whether WikiLeaks can be designated a terrorist organization.

The U.S. government is also investigating whether Assange can be charged with other crimes such as theft of government property or receipt of stolen government property.

It is expected that Assange will defend himself with the First Amendment, which protects freedom of speech and freedom of the press.

Assange has portrayed himself as a crusading journalist. He told ABC News via e-mail that his latest batch of State Department documents would expose "lying, corrupt and murderous leadership from Bahrain to Brazil." He told Time magazine he targets only "organizations that use secrecy to conceal unjust behavior."

But some lawyers argued that WikiLeaks has gone where no journalist has gone before. News organizations have often sought information, including government secrets, for specific stories and printed secrets that government workers delivered to them, but none has matched Assange's open worldwide invitation to send him any secret or confidential information a source can get.

The issue is whether Assange is a journalist, and whether releasing confidential information obtained by others and transferred to him on the website is journalism.

It seems hard at this moment to decide whether the mass disclosure of secret U.S. government documents is journalism or espionage. Even if Assange has been charged with espionage, the debate will continue in court.

Many Americans are asking whether they should have access to those documents.

The New York Times and its global edition, the International Herald Tribune, said the public has the right to know how Washington makes big decisions that could cost the country most heavily in lives and money. But the question is how and when to release such information.

The paper admits that premature disclosures could undermine U.S. national interests and international relationships.

1   2   Next  


Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comments

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 久久人人爽人人爽人人片AV高清 | 91av视频网站| 日本一道本高清免费| 十九岁日本电影免费完整版观看| 超清高清欧美videos| 婷婷五月深深久久精品| 久99久精品免费视频热77 | 国产乱淫a∨片免费视频| h片在线观看免费| 天天看免费高清影视| 亚洲国产成人99精品激情在线| 绿巨人app黄| 国产真实乱在线更新| 99精品人妻无码专区在线视频区| 性欧美69式xxxxx| 久久强奷乱码老熟女| 久久国产精品99精品国产987| 快穿之青梅竹马女配| 丽玲老师高跟鞋调教小说| 日本边添边摸边做边爱的网站 | 国产精品久久久久三级| 69堂在线观看| 国产综合在线观看| 99re6这里有精品热视频在线| 日本高清免费看| 亚洲伊人色一综合网| 波多野结衣免费在线观看| 无码少妇一区二区浪潮AV| 亚洲s色大片在线观看| 欧美成人精品第一区二区三区| 人人妻人人澡av天堂香蕉| 美女开嫩苞视频在线播放| 国产青草亚洲香蕉精品久久| 一区二区视频免费观看| 欧美中文在线观看| 啊轻点灬大ji巴太粗太长h| 说女生二哈是什么意思| 国产区视频在线观看| 香蕉视频a级片| 国产午夜精品一二区理论影院| 日本人强jizz多人高清|