A new label for US diplomacy in Obama era

 
0 CommentsPrint E-mail Xinhua, January 21, 2010
Adjust font size:

Barack Obama on Jan. 20, 2009, told the American people that the United States was deeply involved in a roaring financial tsunami and two stubborn wars.

The president also said the US was facing severe security threats and challenges, and that his administration would be committed to leading America out of its difficulties.

By introducing "smart power" into foreign policy, the Obama administration expects a restoration of U.S. dominance in the international system.

It also expects a structure of global collective cooperation to address the threats and challenges, and an external impetus to revive the U.S. economy.

All of the above are core goals of the Obama White House's political agenda.

Today, a year later, more and more American people, who were waiting for the "change" promised by the president, have gradually seen that the difficulties remain firmly in their life. Some of them, maybe, have realized that Mr. President is not Moses leading the Exodus after all.

Critics say that the administration's diplomacy in its first year has brought nothing meaningful for U.S. security. Others, however, argue that by using "smart power," the administration improved America's image and is restoring leadership in the international system.

Relations with major powers, particularly the European Union, Russia and China, are always top priorities in U.S. foreign policy.

Though strategic mutual trust with Moscow and Beijing remains insufficient, the Obama administration in its first year has steadily developed relations with Russia and China. That would be one of the few highlights in U.S. diplomacy.

However, those stubborn issues, including wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, nuclear stalemates in Iran and the Korean peninsula, and the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians, have almost made no progress.

Analysts say that the United States will lose the war in Afghanistan and that Tehran's tough stance on its nuclear program has sentenced the administration's "engagement" policy to death.

In the first year, the Obama administration has shown more initiative to demonstrate that the U.S. is seeking solutions through multilateral mechanisms for a variety of global challenges and security threats, including the G-20 for financial crisis, COP15 for climate change, the Six-Party talks for the nuclear issue on the Korean peninsula and P5+1 for Iran's nuclear stalemate.

"U.S. is back." As an important declaration, the administration has vowed to return to the "sphere of influence" in Latin America, the Middle East, Africa and Asia, where U.S. leadership deteriorated during the Bush era.

Beside showing goodwill to Iran, Washington has also beefed up its interactions with Cuba, Syria, Sudan and Myanmar. The effect, however, still remains unclear.

Robert Kagan, a senior associate with the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said Obama is a "super idealist" and his idealism has made his so-called "pragmatic" foreign policy develop nothing meaningful on tough international issues.

Joseph Nye, who introduced "smart power" from an international politics conception into U.S. foreign policy, viewed the administration's performance in its first year as "good start."

He praised Obama for restoring U.S. soft power through a series of "symbolic gesture and speeches."

"These will be the tests on which historians will grade him a decade from now," Nye siad, "But while his current course grade is incomplete, he is off to a much better start than his critics admit."

Whatever the criticism or praise is, for U.S. diplomacy in the Obama administration's first year, a recognized fact is that the United States stands as the only super power, and that in the foreseeable future the only adversary capable of defeating it will be the United States itself.

The "smart power," like other doctrines held by the previous administrations, is just a label for U.S. foreign policy.

All of the doctinres have a common and unshakable goal: to prolong and preserve U.S. dominance in the international system.

As Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said, smart power is a "blend of principle and pragmatism."

Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comments

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲AV无码精品网站| 伊人久久大香线蕉影院95| 久久精品免费观看| 欧美日韩在线视频| 人妻影音先锋啪啪av资源| 精品福利视频一区二区三区| 国产偷久久久精品专区| 欧美jizz8性欧美| 国产精品免费小视频| 8x8x在线观看视频高清视频| 在线观看污污视频| reikokobayakawatube| 工囗番漫画全彩无遮拦老师| 中文字幕无码人妻aaa片| 日本不卡在线播放| 久久精品国产成人AV| 晚上看b站直播软件| 亚洲ⅴ国产v天堂a无码二区| 欧美极品JIZZHD欧美| 亚洲熟妇色xxxxx欧美老妇| 菠萝蜜视频在线观看| 国产强被迫伦姧在线观看无码| 天天影视综合网色综合国产| 国产精品无码2021在线观看| 97人人超人超人国产第一页| 夜夜高潮夜夜爽夜夜爱爱一区| jux662正在播放三浦惠理子| 小猪视频免费观看视频下载| 一级做a爰片久久毛片一| 日韩高清电影在线观看| 亚洲人交性视频| 欧美亚洲日本视频| 亚洲国产av无码精品| 欧美寡妇XXXX黑人猛交| 亚洲日产韩国一二三四区| 欧美色欧美亚洲高清在线视频 | 内射白浆一区二区在线观看| 国产精品香蕉在线| 国产极品麻豆91在线| 久草视频在线网| 国产日韩在线亚洲字幕中文|