A new label for US diplomacy in Obama era

 
0 CommentsPrint E-mail Xinhua, January 21, 2010
Adjust font size:

Barack Obama on Jan. 20, 2009, told the American people that the United States was deeply involved in a roaring financial tsunami and two stubborn wars.

The president also said the US was facing severe security threats and challenges, and that his administration would be committed to leading America out of its difficulties.

By introducing "smart power" into foreign policy, the Obama administration expects a restoration of U.S. dominance in the international system.

It also expects a structure of global collective cooperation to address the threats and challenges, and an external impetus to revive the U.S. economy.

All of the above are core goals of the Obama White House's political agenda.

Today, a year later, more and more American people, who were waiting for the "change" promised by the president, have gradually seen that the difficulties remain firmly in their life. Some of them, maybe, have realized that Mr. President is not Moses leading the Exodus after all.

Critics say that the administration's diplomacy in its first year has brought nothing meaningful for U.S. security. Others, however, argue that by using "smart power," the administration improved America's image and is restoring leadership in the international system.

Relations with major powers, particularly the European Union, Russia and China, are always top priorities in U.S. foreign policy.

Though strategic mutual trust with Moscow and Beijing remains insufficient, the Obama administration in its first year has steadily developed relations with Russia and China. That would be one of the few highlights in U.S. diplomacy.

However, those stubborn issues, including wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, nuclear stalemates in Iran and the Korean peninsula, and the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians, have almost made no progress.

Analysts say that the United States will lose the war in Afghanistan and that Tehran's tough stance on its nuclear program has sentenced the administration's "engagement" policy to death.

In the first year, the Obama administration has shown more initiative to demonstrate that the U.S. is seeking solutions through multilateral mechanisms for a variety of global challenges and security threats, including the G-20 for financial crisis, COP15 for climate change, the Six-Party talks for the nuclear issue on the Korean peninsula and P5+1 for Iran's nuclear stalemate.

"U.S. is back." As an important declaration, the administration has vowed to return to the "sphere of influence" in Latin America, the Middle East, Africa and Asia, where U.S. leadership deteriorated during the Bush era.

Beside showing goodwill to Iran, Washington has also beefed up its interactions with Cuba, Syria, Sudan and Myanmar. The effect, however, still remains unclear.

Robert Kagan, a senior associate with the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said Obama is a "super idealist" and his idealism has made his so-called "pragmatic" foreign policy develop nothing meaningful on tough international issues.

Joseph Nye, who introduced "smart power" from an international politics conception into U.S. foreign policy, viewed the administration's performance in its first year as "good start."

He praised Obama for restoring U.S. soft power through a series of "symbolic gesture and speeches."

"These will be the tests on which historians will grade him a decade from now," Nye siad, "But while his current course grade is incomplete, he is off to a much better start than his critics admit."

Whatever the criticism or praise is, for U.S. diplomacy in the Obama administration's first year, a recognized fact is that the United States stands as the only super power, and that in the foreseeable future the only adversary capable of defeating it will be the United States itself.

The "smart power," like other doctrines held by the previous administrations, is just a label for U.S. foreign policy.

All of the doctinres have a common and unshakable goal: to prolong and preserve U.S. dominance in the international system.

As Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said, smart power is a "blend of principle and pragmatism."

Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comments

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 久久久久久99| 亚洲人成色77777在线观看| 能播放18xxx18女同| 国产欧美va欧美va香蕉在线观看| 99久久er这里只有精品18| 性欧美大战久久久久久久| 久久久久久a亚洲欧洲AV| 日韩在线视频观看| 亚洲av永久青草无码精品| 欧美日韩国产码高清综合人成| 伊人免费在线观看高清版| 精品国产欧美另类一区| 国产va免费精品高清在线| 香港三级绝色杨贵妃电影| 国产真实强被迫伦姧女在线观看| 6一13小幻女| 国模gogo中国人体私拍视频| jizzjizz之xxxx18| 日韩免费视频网站| 妖精视频一区二区三区| 国产第一福利136视频导航| 国产在线精品一区二区夜色| 免费1夜情网站| 韩国理论片中文字幕版电影| 国产欧美精品午夜在线播放| 色多多视频在线观看| 国产精品麻豆免费版| 91国在线视频| 国产高清在线精品一区 | 两个小姨子在线观看| 把她抵在洗手台挺进撞击视频| 久久久久性色AV毛片特级| 日本理论片和搜子同居的日子演员| 亚州无吗黄瓜视频有直播的不| 欧美三级在线播放| 亚洲免费观看视频| 欧美亚洲另类视频| 亚洲中文字幕不卡无码| 欧美一区二区三区久久综合| 亚洲乱码中文字幕小综合| 欧美一级中文字幕|