A U.S. federal judge ruled on Monday that the National Security Agency's bulk collection of domestic phone records is likely unconstitutional.
This is a first significant legal setback for the secret intelligence surveillance program since it was first revealed by defense contractor Edward Snowden in June.
In his 68-page opinion, Judge Richard Leon of the U.S. District Court in Washington D.C., found that the plaintiffs of the lawsuit against the Obama administration had demonstrated "a substantial likelihood" of the NSA's domestic phone scooping program violating the Fourth Amendment, which bans unreasonable searches and seizures.
"I cannot imagine a more indiscriminate and arbitrary invasion than this systematic and high-tech collection and retention of personal data on virtually every single citizen for purposes of querying it and analyzing it without judicial approval," wrote Leon.
Leon granted a request from activist Larry Klayman, one of the two plaintiffs, for a preliminary injunction to block the NSA's phone records collection. But the judge put off enforcing his order to allow for an appeal by the government.
This is the first time a court has ruled against the NSA's massive surveillance program on U.S. phones since June.
The American Civil Liberties Union and other groups have also brought separate lawsuits challenging the program, which the intelligence community and the Obama administration have defended as important to protect national security against terrorism.
"I have significant doubts about the efficacy of the metadata collection program as a means of conducting time-sensitive investigations in cases involving imminent threats of terrorism," he wrote. "The government does not cite a single instance in which analysis of the NSA's bulk metadata collection actually stopped an imminent attack, or otherwise aided the Government in achieving any objective that was time-sensitive in nature."
The judge even compared the NSA phone program to George Orwell' s 1984.
"The almost-Orwellian technology that enables the government to store and analyze the phone metadata of every telephone user is unlike anything that could be conceived in 1979," he wrote.
The government lawyers argued that a 1979 Supreme Court ruling in Smith v. Maryland case, found no search warrant was needed by police on phone surveillance. But Leon said such a ruling of over 30 years old may not be applicable to surveillance programs in recent years, as people in 2013 have "an entirely difference relationship with their phones" than 34 years ago.
"The ubiquity of phones has dramatically altered the quantity of information that is available and, more importantly, what that information can tell the government about people's lives," he wrote.
At a daily press briefing shortly after the ruling, White House spokesman Jay Carney referred the inquiries to the Justice Department. The Justice Department spokesman Andrew Ames said the department is still reviewing the federal court's decision.
主站蜘蛛池模板： 亚洲精品一二区| 国产伦一区二区三区高清| tube8最近日本护士| 日本在线观看免费看片| 亚洲乱码卡一卡二卡三| 欧美视频第二页| 女人18岁毛片| 中文字幕在线观看亚洲| 日本高清H色视频在线观看| 亚洲va久久久噜噜噜久久狠狠| 欧美激情xxxx性bbbb| 国产AV一区二区三区最新精品| 91精品视频免费| 国产精品99久久免费| 69天堂人成无码麻豆免费视频| 天堂一区二区三区在线观看| 一级毛片在线完整观看| 成年女人毛片免费观看97| 久久久久久久人妻无码中文字幕爆 | 大佬和我的365天2在线观看 | 美女教师一级毛片| 国产三级a三级三级| 西西人体大胆免费视频| 国产人va在线| 都市美妇至亲孽缘禁忌小说| 国产在线视频一区二区三区98| 国产成人精品1024在线| 国产激情无码一区二区三区| va天堂va亚洲va影视中文字幕 | 欧亚专线欧洲s码wm| 亚洲国产日韩欧美在线| 欧美成人第一页| 亚洲国产精品一区二区久久| 美女色又黄一级毛片| 国产乱xxxxx97国语对白| 韩国v欧美v亚洲v日本v| 国产免费观看网站| 青青草国产免费| 国产乱人伦精品一区二区| 邻居少妇张开腿让我爽了在线观看 | 桃花阁成人网在线观看|