A U.S. federal judge ruled on Monday that the National Security Agency's bulk collection of domestic phone records is likely unconstitutional.
This is a first significant legal setback for the secret intelligence surveillance program since it was first revealed by defense contractor Edward Snowden in June.
In his 68-page opinion, Judge Richard Leon of the U.S. District Court in Washington D.C., found that the plaintiffs of the lawsuit against the Obama administration had demonstrated "a substantial likelihood" of the NSA's domestic phone scooping program violating the Fourth Amendment, which bans unreasonable searches and seizures.
"I cannot imagine a more indiscriminate and arbitrary invasion than this systematic and high-tech collection and retention of personal data on virtually every single citizen for purposes of querying it and analyzing it without judicial approval," wrote Leon.
Leon granted a request from activist Larry Klayman, one of the two plaintiffs, for a preliminary injunction to block the NSA's phone records collection. But the judge put off enforcing his order to allow for an appeal by the government.
This is the first time a court has ruled against the NSA's massive surveillance program on U.S. phones since June.
The American Civil Liberties Union and other groups have also brought separate lawsuits challenging the program, which the intelligence community and the Obama administration have defended as important to protect national security against terrorism.
"I have significant doubts about the efficacy of the metadata collection program as a means of conducting time-sensitive investigations in cases involving imminent threats of terrorism," he wrote. "The government does not cite a single instance in which analysis of the NSA's bulk metadata collection actually stopped an imminent attack, or otherwise aided the Government in achieving any objective that was time-sensitive in nature."
The judge even compared the NSA phone program to George Orwell' s 1984.
"The almost-Orwellian technology that enables the government to store and analyze the phone metadata of every telephone user is unlike anything that could be conceived in 1979," he wrote.
The government lawyers argued that a 1979 Supreme Court ruling in Smith v. Maryland case, found no search warrant was needed by police on phone surveillance. But Leon said such a ruling of over 30 years old may not be applicable to surveillance programs in recent years, as people in 2013 have "an entirely difference relationship with their phones" than 34 years ago.
"The ubiquity of phones has dramatically altered the quantity of information that is available and, more importantly, what that information can tell the government about people's lives," he wrote.
At a daily press briefing shortly after the ruling, White House spokesman Jay Carney referred the inquiries to the Justice Department. The Justice Department spokesman Andrew Ames said the department is still reviewing the federal court's decision.
主站蜘蛛池模板： 国产亚洲美女精品久久久久| 在线观看国产福利| 久久永久免费人妻精品下载| 欧美最猛性xxxxx免费| 免费夜色污私人影院在线观看| 色国产精品一区在线观看| 国产尤物在线视精品在亚洲| 三级黄色毛片视频| 国产高清乱理伦片中文电影| chinese中国农村夫tube| 成**人特级毛片www免费| 久久中文字幕视频| 日韩三级小视频| 亚洲av永久无码精品网站| 欧美换爱交换乱理伦片免费| 亚洲综合一区二区精品久久| 真实乱小说在线阅读| 午夜无码伦费影视在线观看| 老鸭窝二区三区在线播放| 国产亚洲精品国产福利在线观看| 91免费国产在线观看| 无码人妻精品一区二区三区夜夜嗨 | 一级做a爰片久久毛片下载| 无码中文字幕日韩专区| 久久婷婷久久一区二区三区| 最近免费中文字幕mv在线电影| 亚洲视频在线一区二区三区| 秋霞电影网一区二区三区| 午夜成人精品福利网站在线观看| 羞羞歪歪汗汗漫画| 国产va免费高清在线观看| 视频二区中文字幕| 国产六月婷婷爱在线观看| 黄网站在线观看| 国产大尺度吃奶无遮无挡网 | 欧洲肉欲K8播放毛片| 亚洲国产成AV人天堂无码| 欧美日韩在线影院| 亚洲欧洲自拍拍偷午夜色无码| 欧美疯狂性受xxxxx喷水| 亚洲日韩精品欧美一区二区一 |