The Scarborough Shoal (Huangyan Island) does belong to China which discovered it and drew it in a map as early as 1279 during the Yuan Dynasty. Chinese fishermen, from both the Mainland and Taiwan, have since used it. As a matter of fact, Guo Shoujing, (the Chinese astronomer, engineer and mathematician who worked under the Mongol ruler, Kublai Khan) performed surveying of the South China Sea, and the surveying point was the Scarborough Shoal which is considered part of the Zhongsha Islands (renamed Huangyan Island in 1983).
By contrast, the "old maps" being relied upon by our Department of Foreign Affairs in its spurious claim on the same territory were drawn up only in 1820, or 541 years after China's. I am surprised that Senator Edgardo Angara - supposedly a renowned lawyer - can claim that a map drawn 5 centuries and 4 decades after, takes precedence over the much earlier map of China.
But I am all the more astonished that Fr. Joaquin Bernas, in his April 22 article in another newspaper, being one of the main framers of the 1987 Constitution, uses the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea as his basis to defend the Philippine claim. This, despite and after acknowledging the fact that, indeed, "the Scarborough Shoal is OUTSIDE THE LIMITS set by the Treaty of Paris for Philippine territory." What kind of double-speak is that?
So, what exactly was the territory we declared independence from the US in 1946? Why is it that NONE of our constitutions, past and present, from 1899, 1935, 1943, 1973, 1986 and 1987, include either the Spratlys or the Scarborough Shoal within our declared national territory? Where, or from whom, did we, all of a sudden, acquire title to these? Out of thin air?
In the late 1970s, China organized many scientific expeditions in the Shoal and around that area. In fact, in 1980, a stone marker reading "South China Sea Scientific Expedition" was installed by China on the South Rock. This Chinese marker was removed, without authority, by the Philippines in 1997.
All official maps published by the Philippines until the 1990s excluded both the Spratlys and Scarborough Shoal from its territorial boundaries. Our own Republic Act No. 3046, passed by our Congress and approved in 1961, stopped us from our claim. Yet, we had the temerity to amend this law on March 10, 2009, after 48 long years, to unilaterally include the disputed territories.
But what takes the cake is the fact that China holds three international treaties in support of its claim over the territories in question—namely, the 1898 Treaty of Paris between the US and Spain, the 1900 Treaty of Washington between Spain and the US, and the 1930 Treaty between Great Britain and the US, all limiting Philippine territorial limits to the 118th degree meridian of longitude east of Greenwich.
On the other hand, the basis of the Philippine claim is restricted to proximity, relying solely on the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. As far as I know, a mere "convention" cannot overturn or supersede a treaty or an agreement reached between colonial powers. And even if it were considered a "law", it cannot be made to take effect retroactively.
Whom are we fooling?
Posted April 28th, 2012 by Manila Standard Today & filed under Opinion.
主站蜘蛛池模板： 精品国产91久久久久久久a | 午夜爽爽爽男女免费观看hd| 麻豆波多野结衣| 国产精品无码专区在线播放| 99在线视频网站| 少妇性饥渴无码A区免费| 久久99精品久久| 日本视频免费高清一本18| 国产成人一区二区三区| 69堂午夜精品视频在线| 天天做天天做天天综合网| 中国好声音第二季免费播放| 日本三级在线观看免费| 久久精品国产久精国产| 欧美xxxx喷水| 亚洲国产综合在线| 欧美老少配性视频播放| 亚洲香蕉久久一区二区三区四区 | 中文在线√天堂| 无翼乌全彩本子lovelive摄影| 久久精品99视频| 日韩欧美亚洲综合一区二区| 亚洲av熟妇高潮30p| 欧美亚洲国产精品久久| 亚洲影视一区二区| 欧美激情videos| 亚洲欧美日韩久久精品第一区| 熟妇人妻一区二区三区四区 | 天天摸天天舔天天操| ts20p1hellokittyshoes| 婷婷丁香五月中文字幕| 一级做性色a爰片久久毛片| 成人欧美一区二区三区| 中文字幕在线播放一区| 成年人网站在线免费观看| 中文字幕日韩欧美一区二区三区| 日本videoshd高清黑人| 久久久久AV综合网成人| 日本XXXX裸体XXXX| 久久亚洲国产精品123区| 日本午夜免费福利视频|