Hearing ends without ruling over iPad name

China Daily, March 1, 2012

The iPad trademark dispute case was heard by the Guangdong High People's Court in Guangzhou, Guangdong province, on Wednesday. [Chinanews.com]

A court in Guangdong province did not make a final ruling on a lengthy iPad trademark dispute between a Chinese company and tech giant Apple after a public hearing on Wednesday.

The latest hearing, held in Guangdong Provincial High People's Court, followed an initial ruling by the Shenzhen Intermediate People's Court, which rejected a lawsuit in December by Apple and IP Application Development accusing Proview Technology of infringing on the iPad trademark.

The hearing on Wednesday focused on whether Proview Electronics, a Taiwan-based company, had the right to represent Shenzhen-based Proview Technology to sell the iPad trademark.

Xiao Caiyuan, the attorney for Shenzhen Proview, said Shenzhen Proview and Taiwan Proview are two independent companies and the contract signed between Taiwan Proview and Apple for the iPad trademark transfer on the mainland was invalid.

Graham Michael Robinson, witness for tech company Apple, is surrounded by reporters outside the Guangdong High People's Court in Guangzhou, Guangdong province, on Wednesday, as the court held a public hearing on the iPad trademark dispute. [CFP]

Graham Michael Robinson, witness for tech company Apple, is surrounded by reporters outside the Guangdong High People's Court in Guangzhou, Guangdong province, on Wednesday, as the court held a public hearing on the iPad trademark dispute. [CFP]

But attorneys for Apple said Taiwan Proview was linked with Shenzhen Proview and that Apple has the right to use the iPad trademark on the mainland.

Meanwhile, senior executives from Shenzhen Proview, including Yang Rongshan, Mai Shihong and Yuan Hui, have participated in the negotiations for the trademark transfer, representing Taiwan Proview, attorneys for Apple said during the hearing.

Yang was chairman of Shenzhen Proview before he resigned in early 2010, while Mai was director of the legal affairs department with the company.

Taiwan Proview registered the iPad trademark in a number of countries and regions as early as 2000, with Shenzhen Proview registering the trademark on the mainland a year later.

Ma Xiaodong, lawyer of Proview Technology Shenzhen, is interviewed by reporters Wednesday. The iPad trademark dispute case was heard by the Guangdong High People's Court in Guangzhou, Guangdong province, on Wednesday. [CFP]

Ma Xiaodong, lawyer of Proview Technology Shenzhen, is interviewed by reporters Wednesday. The iPad trademark dispute case was heard by the Guangdong High People's Court in Guangzhou, Guangdong province, on Wednesday. [CFP]

At the hearing on Wednesday, representative lawyers of Apple and IP showed new evidence including e-mails between both sides during the early negotiations for the trademark deal.

However, Xiao argued Shenzhen Proview never asked its executives to negotiate with Apple and IP to sell the iPad trademark on the mainland, and Yang himself did not have the right to sell the company's properties.

Shenzhen Proview has registered and used the iPad trademark for more than a decade on the Chinese mainland, he said.

"The contract for the mainland's iPad trademark transfer was signed between Taiwan Proview and Apple and IP Application Development Limited in December of 2009, not Shenzhen Proview," Xiao said.

Apple and IP paid $56,000 to Taiwan Proview for the iPad trademark transfer.

Ma Dongxiao, a lawyer representing Shenzhen Proview, said he was confident of winning the lawsuit.

"E-mails presented by Apple at court actually have no legal validity," Ma said.

The e-mails showed that Yuan Hui, a staff member of Shenzhen Proview, was once involved in the trademark transfer negotiation.

"Yuan was actually asked by Taiwan Proview to help translate some documents during the transfer negotiation. He had no right to represent the Shenzhen side to sign the contract," Ma said.

Also, a lawyer surnamed Wang who attended the public hearing, said Shenzhen Proview has a good chance of winning, according to the evidence produced by both parties so far.

"Shenzhen Proview and Taiwan Proview are after all two different companies, and Shenzhen Proview has never signed the iPad trademark transfer contract with the foreign companies," Wang with the Guangdong Kede Law Firm said.

If the court finds that Apple has infringed on the trademark rights of Shenzhen Proview, its wildly popular iPad tablet computers will be banned from sale on the Chinese mainland.

Wang said the provincial court may uphold the verdict passed by the Shenzhen court in its first trial.

But in a related case heard late last month in Shanghai - where Shenzhen Proview sued Apple's chief distributor in China - the court rejected a request to stop iPad sales.

The iPad trademark dispute case was heard by the Guangdong High People's Court in Guangzhou, Guangdong province, on Wednesday. [CFP]

The iPad trademark dispute case was heard by the Guangdong High People's Court in Guangzhou, Guangdong province, on Wednesday. [CFP]

 

主站蜘蛛池模板: 久久精品日韩Av无码| 亚洲av永久青草无码精品| 一千零一夜电影无删减版在线看| 萌白酱视频在线| 男女啪啪进出阳道猛进| 国产超薄肉色丝袜的免费网站| 国产香蕉97碰碰久久人人| 三级精品在线观看| 欧美国产综合欧美视频| 国产丰满肥熟在线观看| 99视频精品全部在线观看| 男女下面进入拍拍免费看| 日韩在线播放全免费| 欧美h片在线观看| 国产免费小视频| 久久久噜噜噜久久中文字幕色伊伊 | 亚洲精品无码mv在线观看| 迷走都市1-3ps免费图片| 国产麻豆欧美亚洲综合久久| 久久久99精品成人片中文字幕| 欧美综合自拍亚洲综合图| 性高朝久久久久久久| 亚洲av无码专区电影在线观看| 狠狠色噜噜狠狠狠狠av| 国产内射999视频一区| 国产男人午夜视频在线观看| 在线视频一二三区| 丰满少妇人妻久久久久久| 欧美18性精品| 亚洲国产成人精品无码区在线网站| 精品久久亚洲中文无码| 国产大秀视频一区二区三区 | 欧美亚洲一区二区三区| 免费A级毛片无码免费视频| 高h辣肉嗨文公交车| 国产鲁鲁视频在线播放| 99精品久久久中文字幕| 无码成人AAAAA毛片| 亚洲国产成人手机在线电影bd| 欧美最猛黑人xxxx黑人猛交黄| 制服丝袜日韩中文字幕在线|