Luxury brand Hermes loses trademark lawsuit

China.org.cn, February 27, 2012

A clerk walks out of a Hermes store. [File photo]

A clerk walks out of a Hermes store. [File photo]

French luxury Group Hermes has lost its trademark lawsuit over its appeal to China's Trademark Appeal Board to cancel a trademark similar to its Chinese name, the Legal Evening News reported over the weekend.

Hermes has registered its English name and pattern in China in 1977. However, it never registered its Chinese name as a trademark.

In 1995, Guangdong-based clothing company Dafeng Garment Factory applied to the trademark board to register the trademark "愛瑪仕" for clothing products. The application later passed the board's preliminary review and was announced to the public.

Hermes appealed to the trademark board in 1997 over the trademark "愛瑪仕", saying that it's quite similar to the Chinese name of Hermes "愛馬仕". The two names share the same Chinese pinyin spelling: Ai Ma Shi.

However, the trademark board rejected Hermes' appeal and approved the Chinese company's registration in 2001.

In 2009, Hermes once again appealed to the board, saying its Chinese name enjoyed a high reputation around the world and asking the board to cancel the disputed trademark. However, Hermes' application was rejected for a second time in May last year.

Hermes claims that its Chinese name should be protected as an unregistered well-known trademark in China. It said the disputed trademark was an imitation of its Chinese name and was obtained through "deceptive means,", according to the newspaper report.

Hermes asked the court to cancel the board's ruling but the board said it had approved registration of the disputed trademark through legal procedures.

The clothing company, which was also represented, agreed with the board, the court was told.

The court said that most of the evidence presented by Hermes happened after the disputed trademark had been registered. Also, the evidence was mainly media reports about the Chinese name of Hermes in Hong Kong, which fails to prove Hermes was well-known among consumers on the Chinese mainland. Besides, Hermes also failed to provide evidence showing the disputed trademark had been acquired illegally and therefore the court ruled against the French luxury brand.

Several other international corporations are also involved in trademark disputes in China recently. Apple, producer of the iPad tablet computer, is involved in a legal dispute over the use of the iPad name on the Chinese mainland. Meanwhile, NBA legend Michael Jordan has filed a lawsuit against a Chinese sportswear producer, Qiaodan Sports Co. Ltd, which has registered and used brand the same as Jordan's Chinese name.

主站蜘蛛池模板: 草草草在线观看| 91福利视频一区| 日本理论片和搜子同居的日子演员| 亚洲女初尝黑人巨高清| 男人女人做30分爽爽视频| 四个美女大学被十七个txt| 高清不卡毛片免费观看| 国产第一页屁屁影院| 91av视频免费在线观看| 天天摸天天碰天天爽天天弄| 一级特黄aaa大片在线观看视频| 日产一区日产片| 久久精品女人天堂AV麻| 欧美XXXX黑人又粗又长精品| 亚洲欧美国产五月天综合| 狂野欧美性猛xxxx乱大交| 全免费a级毛片免费看| 美女色又黄一级毛片| 国产亚洲欧美日韩精品一区二区| 黄色福利在线观看| 国产精品91在线| 1024视频在线| 国产黄在线观看免费观看不卡| eeuss在线播放| 学霸c了我一节课| 一边摸一边揉一边做视频| 拍拍拍无挡视频免费观看1000| 久久九九AV免费精品| 日韩一区二区三区电影| 久久综合亚洲色hezyo国产| 欧美xxxxx做受vr| 亚洲伊人久久大香线蕉| 欧美日本在线一区二区三区| 亚洲狠狠婷婷综合久久久久| 热99re久久国超精品首页| 伊人久久大香线蕉综合影| 白丝袜美女羞羞漫画| 免费福利在线视频| 精品一区二区久久| 免费无码成人片| 精品三级久久久久电影网1|