Luxury brand Hermes loses trademark lawsuit

China.org.cn, February 27, 2012

A clerk walks out of a Hermes store. [File photo]

A clerk walks out of a Hermes store. [File photo]

French luxury Group Hermes has lost its trademark lawsuit over its appeal to China's Trademark Appeal Board to cancel a trademark similar to its Chinese name, the Legal Evening News reported over the weekend.

Hermes has registered its English name and pattern in China in 1977. However, it never registered its Chinese name as a trademark.

In 1995, Guangdong-based clothing company Dafeng Garment Factory applied to the trademark board to register the trademark "愛瑪仕" for clothing products. The application later passed the board's preliminary review and was announced to the public.

Hermes appealed to the trademark board in 1997 over the trademark "愛瑪仕", saying that it's quite similar to the Chinese name of Hermes "愛馬仕". The two names share the same Chinese pinyin spelling: Ai Ma Shi.

However, the trademark board rejected Hermes' appeal and approved the Chinese company's registration in 2001.

In 2009, Hermes once again appealed to the board, saying its Chinese name enjoyed a high reputation around the world and asking the board to cancel the disputed trademark. However, Hermes' application was rejected for a second time in May last year.

Hermes claims that its Chinese name should be protected as an unregistered well-known trademark in China. It said the disputed trademark was an imitation of its Chinese name and was obtained through "deceptive means,", according to the newspaper report.

Hermes asked the court to cancel the board's ruling but the board said it had approved registration of the disputed trademark through legal procedures.

The clothing company, which was also represented, agreed with the board, the court was told.

The court said that most of the evidence presented by Hermes happened after the disputed trademark had been registered. Also, the evidence was mainly media reports about the Chinese name of Hermes in Hong Kong, which fails to prove Hermes was well-known among consumers on the Chinese mainland. Besides, Hermes also failed to provide evidence showing the disputed trademark had been acquired illegally and therefore the court ruled against the French luxury brand.

Several other international corporations are also involved in trademark disputes in China recently. Apple, producer of the iPad tablet computer, is involved in a legal dispute over the use of the iPad name on the Chinese mainland. Meanwhile, NBA legend Michael Jordan has filed a lawsuit against a Chinese sportswear producer, Qiaodan Sports Co. Ltd, which has registered and used brand the same as Jordan's Chinese name.

主站蜘蛛池模板: 日本高清黄色片| 激情六月在线视频观看| 国产婷婷综合在线视频| 7777精品伊人久久久大香线蕉| 孕交videodesexo孕交| 国产不卡视频在线| 日韩在线你懂的| 国产美女爽到喷出水来视频| tube欧美69xxxx| 成a人片亚洲日本久久| 久久96精品国产| 日韩一区二区三区无码影院| 亚洲av女人18毛片水真多| 欧美精品亚洲一区二区在线播放| 免费久久精品国产片香蕉| 精品福利一区二区三区| 国产中文99视频在线观看| 黄色一级免费网站| 国产欧美日韩综合精品一区二区 | 国产精品99久久免费观看| 91国视频在线| 国内免费高清视频在线观看| 99精品国产在热久久无毒不卡| 天海翼一区二区三区四区| 一区二区三区四区无限乱码| 性做久久久久免费看| 中文字幕乱码第一页| 新木乃伊电影免费观看完整版| 久久99精品久久久久久齐齐| 日本乱人伦aⅴ精品| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片AV东京热| 日韩精品中文乱码在线观看| 亚洲av最新在线观看网址| 男女边摸边吃奶边做免费观看 | 99国产欧美久久久精品蜜芽| 天天摸天天看天天做天天爽 | 人人干人人干人人干| 男国少年梦电影| 免费A级毛片无码A∨| 真实处破女系列全过程| 免费萌白酱国产一区二区|