Respect for different viewpoints

By He Wenping
China Daily, February 16, 2012

The veto by Russia and China a week ago, of a UN Security Council draft resolution on Syria, sparked an international furore.

There is no difficulty in understanding that Russia, which is used to speaking tough diplomatic language, blocked the resolution due to its important military, economic and strategic stakes in Syria. Western countries no doubt expected this.

The Western outcry was directed at Beijing's veto and some of the comments were simply absurd.

Susan Rice, the US ambassador to the UN, disregarding diplomatic manners, said she was "disgusted" by the vetoes by Russia and China, and both have the blood of the Syrian people on their hands. Some said the veto was a result of China's blind adherence to the "obsolete" principle of non-interference in other countries' internal affairs, or was due to China's efforts to cooperate with Moscow's diplomatic initiative. Some even made the foolish claim that Beijing was worried about a similar uprising to the "Arab Spring" in China.

Western opinion also focused on the change in China's voting behavior in the UN Security Council, from abstention to a clear-cut veto. Ignoring China's past history of vetoes, though far less than those of the United States, they said China's veto signified Beijing's growing "diplomatic assertiveness" or even "diplomatic arrogance". There were even some who suggested that the votes over Syria marked "the start of a new Cold War".

Such comments are senseless. The diplomatic arrogance is in fact diplomatic self-confidence, and cooperating with Russia is the two countries joining hands to defend the norms of international relations.

As for the suggestion that the veto was the start of a new Cold War, it places too much importance on what was simply a veto and amplifies the difference on how to solve the Syrian crisis.

In fact, the West's response to the veto by China and Russia once again demonstrates the hegemony and undemocratic nature of today's international relations and international governance.

It stands to reason that members of the UN Security Council will differ on some issues. The US has vetoed resolutions on the Israeli-Palestinian issue dozens of times. According to Rice's own logic, the US is "disgusting" and has had the blood of the Palestinian people on its hands for decades.

A number of Western countries have long been adopting a paradoxical approach to domestic and international issues. On domestic issues, they adhere to the principles of democracy and freedom, and allow pluralistic debate and dissent; but when dealing with international relations, they prefer media assaults, economic sanctions and even military strikes against countries holding different views.

In fact, the Western media does not represent international opinion or the people of the world.

But by manipulating the Western-owned media, the West can deliver its views and opinions worldwide in a constant barrage, creating the illusion that the West's views equate to world opinion.

However, the fact is, more than 190 countries around the world and "the silent majority" of world people hate war, cherish peace and support efforts to solve conflicts through mediation and dialogue.

A pluralistic world should allow the existence of diverse voices. And those Western countries that always position themselves on the moral high ground should listen more attentively to others and safeguard peace instead of fanning the flames of conflicts.

With regard to the current crisis in Syria, external forces should balance their pressure on the parties involved and urge both sides to the negotiation table. Efforts should seek to achieve a peaceful and orderly political transition, so civilian casualties are kept to the minimum.

The international community should give Russia and China more time for mediation, rather than forcing a hurried vote in the UN Security Council, which has only escalated the crisis rather than resolve it.

The author is a researcher with Institute of West Asian and African Studies under the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.

主站蜘蛛池模板: 高清不卡毛片免费观看| 99爱在线视频| 日本红怡院在线| 亚洲免费观看视频| 欧美金发白嫩在线播放| 全部免费a级毛片| 色偷偷91综合久久噜噜噜男男| 国产欧美一区二区精品久久久 | 双乳奶水被老汉吸呻吟视频 | 久久久受www免费人成| 最新欧洲大片免费在线| 亚洲免费在线观看视频| 欧美日韩国产另类在线观看| 亚洲线精品一区二区三区| 男生插入女生下面视频| 午夜一级毛片免费视频| 老师小sao货水好多真紧h视频| 国产伦一区二区三区高清| 黑人巨茎大战俄罗斯美女| 国产精品一区二区综合| 1313苦瓜网在线播| 国产美女一级做受在线观看| 99re在线视频精品| 天堂网最新版www| www.91av.| 女娃开嫩苞经历小说| 一个色综合高清在线观看| 快点cao我要被cao烂了| 中文在线天堂资源www| 把水管开水放b里是什么感觉 | 国产一区风间由美在线观看| 青青青在线观看视频免费播放| 国产成人免费高清在线观看 | 亚洲va精品中文字幕| 欧美国产日韩在线| 亚洲女初尝黑人巨高清| 欧美日韩精品久久久免费观看| 亚洲欧美自拍明星换脸| 欧美色图校园春色| 亚洲欧洲日韩在线电影| 欧美成人精品第一区首页|