Blueprint for fair demolition compensation

China Daily, June 9, 2011

The central government is requiring that compensation for properties reclaimed for demolition equal at least the market price to protect property owners' rights and interests and reduce related conflicts.

The Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development said on its website on Tuesday that work on property evaluation must be done by a qualified third-party rating institution, chosen after consultation with local residents.

The notice also required that the value of land where the property is located as well as indoor decorations and relocation settlement costs be taken into consideration for compensation.

The notice follows a regulation on home demolitions that was approved by the State Council, China's Cabinet, in January, which aimed to end forced relocations by governments.

According to the regulation, local governments are forbidden from using administrative powers to forcibly demolish residents' properties, and disputed cases shall be determined by courts.

Analysts said the latest notice was of great importance in setting fair compensation for home demolitions, which have provoked a number of high-profile incidents during forced relocations in recent years.

"The central government strived to establish fairness in a series of rules on property evaluation. It's an obvious improvement," Wang Xixin, a law professor in Peking University, told China Daily on Wednesday.

Wang is one of the five law professors who wrote an open letter to the National People's Congress, the top legislature, urging a revision of the country's demolition regulation at the end of 2009 - an event that captivated public attention.

Wang said there are still some loopholes on detailed procedures for property evaluation, which would weaken its credibility among the public.

"For instance, according to the notice, local governments will pay for the expenses on property evaluation. In this case, property owners will query the credibility of evaluation institutions when they can't get expected compensation," he said.

Also, property owners should have the right to choose institutions from across the country, instead of the current limited choices among local institutions, he added.

Li Chang'an, a public policy professor at the Beijing-based University of International Business and Economics, said whether local residents could make good use of their rights would also be a big problem in the future.

"There were always many households living on the same street. Therefore, it will be difficult to decide on an ideal institution for property evaluation as everyone has different choices," he said.

主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产太嫩了在线观看| 4ayy私人影院| 色妞bbbb女女女女| 日韩AV高清无码| 低头看我是怎么c哭你的细节| 黑人巨茎大战欧美白妇| 天天摸天天做天天爽水多| 久久精品免费一区二区喷潮| 渣男渣女抹胸渣男渣女| 国产啪精品视频网站免费尤物| JAPANESE在线播放国产| 日本乱子伦xxxx| 亚洲日本一区二区三区在线不卡| 老熟女高潮一区二区三区| 国产精品亚洲四区在线观看| 一级特黄女**毛片| 最好看免费中文字幕2019| 众多明星短篇乱淫小说| 综合人妻久久一区二区精品 | 狠狠躁夜夜躁人人爽天天古典| 国产亚洲欧美一区二区| 4hc44四虎www在线影院男同| 在线免费观看h| 成人免费无码大片a毛片| 亚洲黄色在线观看视频| 麻绳紧缚奴隷女囚| 在线观看亚洲人成网站| 久久久久久久久人体| 欧美老妇与禽交| 啊轻点灬大ji巴太粗太长了h| 怡红院色视频在线| 妖精动漫在线观看| 久久精品国产亚洲欧美| 欧美一区二区三区四区视频| 免费体验120秒视频| 蜜桃成熟时2005| 国产白白视频在线观看2| 99久久精品这里只有精品| 无码成人AAAAA毛片| 亚洲www在线观看| 深夜影院一级毛片|