The central government is requiring that compensation for properties reclaimed for demolition equal at least the market price to protect property owners' rights and interests and reduce related conflicts.
The Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development said on its website on Tuesday that work on property evaluation must be done by a qualified third-party rating institution, chosen after consultation with local residents.
The notice also required that the value of land where the property is located as well as indoor decorations and relocation settlement costs be taken into consideration for compensation.
The notice follows a regulation on home demolitions that was approved by the State Council, China's Cabinet, in January, which aimed to end forced relocations by governments.
According to the regulation, local governments are forbidden from using administrative powers to forcibly demolish residents' properties, and disputed cases shall be determined by courts.
Analysts said the latest notice was of great importance in setting fair compensation for home demolitions, which have provoked a number of high-profile incidents during forced relocations in recent years.
"The central government strived to establish fairness in a series of rules on property evaluation. It's an obvious improvement," Wang Xixin, a law professor in Peking University, told China Daily on Wednesday.
Wang is one of the five law professors who wrote an open letter to the National People's Congress, the top legislature, urging a revision of the country's demolition regulation at the end of 2009 - an event that captivated public attention.
Wang said there are still some loopholes on detailed procedures for property evaluation, which would weaken its credibility among the public.
"For instance, according to the notice, local governments will pay for the expenses on property evaluation. In this case, property owners will query the credibility of evaluation institutions when they can't get expected compensation," he said.
Also, property owners should have the right to choose institutions from across the country, instead of the current limited choices among local institutions, he added.
Li Chang'an, a public policy professor at the Beijing-based University of International Business and Economics, said whether local residents could make good use of their rights would also be a big problem in the future.
"There were always many households living on the same street. Therefore, it will be difficult to decide on an ideal institution for property evaluation as everyone has different choices," he said.
主站蜘蛛池模板: 精品久久久久久婷婷| 91精品视频免费| 皇后羞辱打开双腿调教h| 国产人成视频在线观看| imim5.vip| 成年女性特黄午夜视频免费看| 亚洲精品一卡2卡3卡三卡四卡| 精品人妻中文字幕有码在线| 国产乱人伦偷精品视频| 黑人狠狠的挺身进入| 天天天天躁天天爱天天碰2018| 中文字幕亚洲综合久久男男| 欧美三级黄色大片| 后入内射欧美99二区视频 | 日韩大片高清播放器| 伊人国产在线播放| 美女尿口免费影视app| 国产亚洲av片在线观看播放| 69视频免费观看l| 壮熊私gay网站的| eeuss影院130020部| 日本香蕉一区二区三区| 么公的又大又深又硬想要| 欧美一区二区三区久久综| 亚洲成熟人网站| 欧美精品束缚一区二区三区| 亚洲综合色网站| 狂野欧美激情性xxxx| 国产三级无码内射在线看| 香港全黄一级毛片在线播放| 国产老妇一性一交一乱| 99精品无人区乱码1区2区3区| 日本免费人成在线网站| 久久综合九色综合97伊人麻豆| 欧洲成人在线视频| 你是我的城池营垒免费观看完整版| 精品福利视频第一| 四虎国产精品成人| 亚洲黄色激情视频| 天堂资源bt种子在线| 一二三四在线观看免费中文动漫版|