The World Trade Organization's (WTO) trade talks, known as the Doha Development Round, are in crisis. The differences among key countries are so wide that they appear to be "unbridgeable". This became evident from the WTO's latest 600-plus-page report, which was issued last month.
At a meeting on April 29, WTO member states agreed to try again in May to find a political solution, so that a deal could be struck by the end of this year.
The deep impasse has not been caused by technical issues alone. There is a clash of paradigms, too.
Developing countries want to stay true to the development objectives of the Doha Round. Doha started as a "development agenda" and the pledge that developing countries' interests would occupy center stage. The round was supposed to correct the imbalances in many WTO's rules.
But rich countries have given the developmental aspects a not so silent burial. Instead, they have made opening up developing countries' markets the main aim of the talks, while using the many loopholes to escape serious obligations of their own. Needless to say, they have mainly succeeded in this, as can be seen from the WTO report issued in April.
According to the report, developed countries would be allowed to continue granting high subsidies to their agriculture sectors. The only change would be in name and type. They'd be allowed to shelter their "sensitive products" from steep tariff cuts, too.
In contrast, developing countries would have to cut their farm tariffs more steeply (by up to 36 percent on average) than they did during the Uruguay Round (24 percent on average). While they'd be allowed to have a new special safeguard mechanism aimed at avoiding rapid increase in imports that could damage local farm productions, the proposed mechanism would be difficult to use and of very limited benefit.
Worse is the proposed text on industrial tariff cuts. Under a specific formula, developing countries would have to cut their bound tariffs on industrial products very steeply. The developing countries hurt by the formula would end up with average applied tariffs of 11-12 percent and thus risk cheap imports damaging their domestic industries.
主站蜘蛛池模板： 免费视频中文字幕| 日韩精品国产自在久久现线拍| 国产h视频在线观看网站免费| 欧美激情成人网| 性欧美videos另类视频| 亚洲国产视频网| 美女被cao免费看在线看网站| 国产精品永久免费自在线观看| 久9热免费精品视频在线观看| 每日更新在线观看av| 国产亚洲精品aa片在线观看网站| 亚洲香蕉久久一区二区| 婷婷综合五月天| 中文字幕视频不卡| 欧美人与性动交α欧美精品| 交换人生电影在线| 真实男女xx00动态图视频| 四虎国产精品永久在线网址| 永久在线观看www免费视频| 性欧美videos高清喷水| 久久久国产精品一区二区18禁| 最近最新好看的中文字幕2019| 免费一级特黄视频| 香蕉成人伊视频在线观看| 国内精自品线一区91| freexxxx性女hd性中国| 女仆被扒内裤打屁股动态图| 久久免费小视频| 欧美狂摸吃奶呻吟| 午夜a成v人电影| 黄网站在线播放| 国产欧美国产精品第一区| 亚洲情综合五月天| 国产猛男猛女超爽免费视频| free哆啪啪免费永久| 小sao货赵欢欢的大学生活txt| 久久精品欧美日韩精品| 欧美黄色xxx| 动漫精品一区二区三区四区 | www.日日爱| 日本aⅴ日本高清视频影片www|