分享縮略圖
 

WADA did not mishandle Chinese doping case, says investigator

0 Comment(s)Print E-mail Xinhua, July 17, 2024
Adjust font size:

The World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) did not show "favoritism or deference, or in any way favoured" the 23 Chinese swimmers who tested positive for trimetazidine (TMZ) due to food contamination in 2021, an independent prosecutor report has said.

WADA held an online extraordinary Executive meeting on Tuesday in Montreal discussing the interim report delivered by Independent Prosecutor Eric Cottier, regarding his review of WADA's handling of the China Anti-Doping Agency's (CHINADA's) no-fault contamination case involving 23 swimmers from China in 2021.

World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) President Witold Banka receives an interview from Xinhua News Agency at the Main Press Center (MPC) of Tokyo 2020 in Tokyo, Japan, July 23, 2021. (Xinhua/Luo Yuan)

In the report, Cottier concluded that WADA had been unbiased and reasonable in handling the case.

"There is nothing in the file - which is complete - to suggest that WADA showed favoritism or deference, or in any way favoured the 23 swimmers who tested positive for trimetazidine (TMZ) between 1 and 3 January 2021, when it proceeded to review CHINADA's decision to close the proceedings against them without further action," the report said.

"The Investigator did not find any evidence to suggest any interference or meddling in WADA's review, as described above, either within the Agency or externally, from any entity or institution, including CHINADA or the Chinese authorities.

"The investigation did not reveal any irregularities on the part of WADA in the review of CHINADA's decision; this review was detailed and covered all relevant issues in determining whether or not to appeal the decision," the report concluded.

As for WADA not to appeal CHINADA's decision not to bring forward Anti-Doping Rule Violations against the 23 Chinese swimmers, the report said: "All the elements taken into consideration by WADA, whether they come from the file produced by CHINADA with its decision or from the investigation procedures that it carried out, show the decision not to appeal to be reasonable, both from the point of view of the facts and the applicable rules."

"As the report captures, WADA reviewed this case with a healthy skepticism as it does in all such cases. It was very important that we set the record straight in this regard; and, in particular regarding these two fundamental questions in advance of the Paris 2024 Olympic and Paralympic Games," WADA president Witold Banka said.

WADA Senior Director, Science and Medicine, Olivier Rabin, said: "In this case, despite our skepticism, a thorough review of all the verifiable facts of the case revealed no evidence to challenge the contamination scenario. Rather, all the available evidence pointed towards no-fault contamination versus intentional ingestion. Ultimately, in his report today, the Independent Prosecutor has confirmed that our conclusions were reasonable, based on the evidence."

Follow China.org.cn on Twitter and Facebook to join the conversation.
ChinaNews App Download
Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Enter the words you see:   
    Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 人妻有码中文字幕| 日本三级高清电影全部| 国产一级电影在线观看| a级国产乱理伦片在线观看| 日本免费看视频| 九九99re在线视频精品免费| 精品人妻无码专区中文字幕| 国产精品jizz视频| 一级毛片黄色片| 校花哭着扒开屁股浣肠漫画| 亚洲精品你懂的| 篠田优被公侵犯电影| 国产情侣一区二区| 99re热视频这里只精品| 少妇被躁爽到高潮无码文| 久草这里只有精品| 欧美人与牲动交xxxxbbbb| 国产好爽…又高潮了毛片| linmm视频在线观看| 日韩中文字幕在线观看视频| 亚洲精品www| 男人j桶进女人p无遮挡在线观看| 国产午夜免费秋霞影院| 4480yy苍苍私人| 成人区人妻精品一区二区不卡网站| 亚洲av最新在线观看网址 | 久久最新免费视频| 欧美黑人又粗又硬xxxxx喷水| 国产69久久精品成人看小说| 青草娱乐极品免费视频| 国产精品成人免费视频网站 | 热99re久久精品天堂vr| 依恋影视在线观看韩国| 色费女人18女人毛片免费视频| 国产精品亚洲精品日韩已满| www.97色| 女人把私人部位扒开视频在线看| 久久人人爽爽爽人久久久| 欧美人与zozoxxxx视频| 亚洲成a人片在线观| 看**视频一级毛片|