?The UK's economic prospects continue to dwindle

By Tom Fowdy
0 Comment(s)Print E-mail China.org.cn, February 22, 2023
Adjust font size:

In early February, about half a million people went on strike in the U.K. [Photo/cfp.cn]

"The United Kingdom lost more working days to strikes in 2022 than in any year since 1989, as employees walked out in large numbers over pay amid soaring living costs," reads an article on CNN. Last year was, to put it mildly, a miserable experience for the U.K. Despite having mostly recovered from COVID-19, the country's economy remains in a state of stagnation. Faced with shrinking incomes and crippling levels of inflation, its economic performance is worse than any country in the G7 and the only one expected to enter recession. 

The grim economic prospects throughout the country have led to a tidal wave of economic discontent that has manifested in strikes across the board, drawing upon memories of the industrial unrest and upheavals faced in the 1970s and 1980s. In public opinion polls, the current government is deeply unpopular and trails the opposition Labour Party by over 20 points. Many decisions the government has made, including the decision to follow the U.S. blindly in escalating tensions with China, deliberately intensifying the war in Ukraine, and Brexit, among things, are responsible for the economic fallout. The product is a "broken Britain."

Since the late 1970s, the U.K.'s Conservative Party has premised its economic policy on Neoliberalism, which has religiously adhered to the fundamentals of free-market economics and privatization, even at the staggering expense of the British themselves. While this began with the reign of Margaret Thatcher, who destroyed Britain's industrial base and created large-scale regional inequalities, it was ultimately continued with the government of David Cameron, who pursued the largest program of austerity the country had seen in a century, gutting the public sector and only deepening the country's growing inequalities.

The combined long-term impact of these economic policies has been to effectively sacrifice the British working class, shrinking incomes, undermining consumption, and creating an economic model which has made British-led innovation and competitiveness untenable, leading to long-term economic stagnation from as far back as 2008. Politically, the end result of this trajectory has been to create social-economic conflict in the U.K. in the form of populist right-wing nationalism, promoted by the popular right-wing press, which ultimately resulted in Brexit.

The Conservative government has responded to these shifts by injecting nationalism into its foreign policy in order to make up for its domestic shortcomings. While the government of David Cameron was liberal in nature and pro-EU, he subsequently lost the internal partisan struggle over Brexit, as well as the referendum, leading to a new status quo led by Boris Johnson, which has sacrificed reason and economic logic for the sake of populism.

The result of this domestic-foreign policy dynamic, which seeks to mask domestic structural economic failures with imperial adventurism abroad, has become self-reinforcing and reflected in growing damage to Britain's economy. British foreign policy, with respect to Russia, China, and the European Union, as well as elsewhere, is being driven by ideology, not reason, making the primary drivers of the country's GDP stagnation and surging inflation. Thus, in 2022, the United Kingdom began to face industrial unrest as workers and unions felt their incomes were no longer sufficient to match rising prices. According to the Office for National Statistics, "843,000 working days were lost in December 2022 alone – the highest monthly number since November 2011," with "workers in health care, communications, and transportation among those who walked out."

The economic system that the U.K. adopted in the 1970s and 1980s no longer delivers for ordinary people. Instead, it is dividing the country, and such divisions have only been intensified by more aggressive policies by successive governments and have created economic stagnation. With Britain being a service-based economy, it is failing to grow because people's incomes are shrinking, and, worse still, the foreign policy environment that the British government is creating goes fundamentally against its own national interest. If the U.K. is to recover, a dramatic change is needed, and that should start with binning the "post-Boris Johnson" consensus of nationalism, populism, and geopolitical adventurism, all of which have dealt significant damage to the country's place in the world.

Tom Fowdy is a British political and international relations analyst and a graduate of Durham and Oxford universities. For more information please visit: 

http://www.ccgp-fushun.com/opinion/TomFowdy.htm

Opinion articles reflect the views of their authors, not necessarily those of China.org.cn.

If you would like to contribute, please contact us at opinion@china.org.cn. 

Follow China.org.cn on Twitter and Facebook to join the conversation.
ChinaNews App Download
Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Enter the words you see:   
    Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 客厅餐桌椅子上波多野结衣| 最近中文字幕2018高清在线| 嘿嘿嘿视频免费网站在线观看| 欧美日韩一区二区三区四区在线观看| 欧美黑人激情性久久| 四虎影院免费视频| 2021年国产精品久久| 奇米小说首页图片区小说区| 中文字幕亚洲精品无码| 欧美日韩一区二区三区麻豆| 伊人色综合视频一区二区三区| 老师的奶好大摸着好爽| 国产精品成人一区二区三区| 99精产国品一二三产| 日本理论片午夜论片| 亚洲av永久无码嘿嘿嘿| 欧美成aⅴ人高清免费观看| 午夜亚洲av永久无码精品| 色婷婷综合久久久久中文一区二区| 国产高清免费的视频| chinese国产xxxx实拍| 日本一道高清不卡免费| 久久精品国产自在一线| 欧美黑人巨大videos极品| 伊人久久大香线蕉亚洲| 精品一区二区久久久久久久网站| 国产在线看片网站| 97se亚洲综合在线| 成人国产精品免费视频| 久久久久久亚洲精品无码| 日本高清免费不卡在线| 久久精品隔壁老王影院| 极品精品国产超清自在线观看| 亚洲午夜在线一区| 欧美性生交xxxxx久久久| 免费人成年轻人电影| 金8天国欧美视频hd黑白| 国产精品自产拍2021在线观看| 999国产精品999久久久久久| 在线观看的免费视频网站| 中文字幕久热精品视频在线|