Midterm elections: Nothing can be changed

By Tom Fowdy
0 Comment(s)Print E-mail China.org.cn, November 11, 2022
Adjust font size:
People are seen at a polling station in New York City, the United States, on Nov. 8, 2022. [Photo/Xinhua]

The U.S. midterm elections took place on Tuesday, with voters electing members of the House of Representatives and one-third of the Senate. In the run-up to the election, many pundits predicted a backlash against U.S. President Joe Biden, given the poor state of the U.S. economy and surging inflation. However, this so-called red wave did not materialize. While Republicans have seemingly made gains in the House of Representatives and are likely to take control of it, they have been unable to gain traction in the Senate. The outcome is expected to be a 50-50 split or a very narrow majority. 

Not surprisingly, Biden and the Democrats have already heralded the result after faring better than hoped, declaring that "democracy still works." However, it was hardly a thumping victory either. Polling also showed that high inflation and the economy were the concerns of most people voting in the election. In that case, why was the result so indecisive? And what does this tell us about the outlook for American politics?

While there is widespread anger and disillusionment in American politics, it is nonetheless also true that a Donald Trump-backed Republican party is no longer the force it was and is increasingly seen as lacking credibility. Trump held strong sway over the selection of candidates for the U.S. Senate, many of whom were criticized for a perceived lack of quality. Given that Senate races are determined mainly by personality, due to their longer terms and higher status than the House, many attributed surprise Republican defeats, such as in Pennsylvania, to Trumpian candidates.

Second, much emphasis was placed on the role of women voters. Earlier this year, the critically significant "Roe v. Wade" ruling, which affirmed a woman's constitutional right to abortion, was overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court, a highly controversial decision. This led many Republican states to move swiftly to impose abortion bans. Concern over this issue contributed to a higher turnout of female voters consequentially voting Democrat. This coincided with many individual states holding their own proposition votes to place abortion as a right within their own local constitutions. While this was only done in Democrat-dominated states, the abortion issue had a run-on effect in battleground swing states.

Third, the result demonstrates that American politics is so divided and polarized that it is difficult for any party to build a coalition and win decisively, revealing the entrenchment of most voters into each camp. In the 1960s, 70s and 80s, it was possible for U.S. Presidents to win sweeping victories and unite most of America behind their mandate. For example, Lyndon B. Johnson's victory over Barry Goldwater in 1964 and Ronald Reagan's victory over Walter Mondale in 1980 were both landslides. But those days are gone because American society has become more culturally and politically divided than ever before. One might ask when the last time a Republican president was able to win California or New York (Reagan, 1984) or the last time a Democrat won the entire deep south (Carter, 1976).

As the space for compromise and common ground across U.S. politics shrinks, so has the number of voters willing to change their minds. American politics has thus become increasingly ideological and tribal. Hence, these midterm elections were overshadowed by the "culture wars," with abortion and Trump acting as substantial polarizing factors. The other side is not seen as a "hope" for respective change or progress but as an "other" and an "enemy." Every election has subsequently become "high-stakes," which minimizes the potential scope of change.

Thus, it should not be surprising that the midterm results are, at best, indecisive because they reflect the status of an increasingly divided and broken American political framework marred by partisan conflict. When viewed like this, it is not so much a victory for democracy, but rather the frustrations and limitations of the system. 

Tom Fowdy is a British political and international relations analyst and a graduate of Durham and Oxford universities. For more information please visit: 

http://www.ccgp-fushun.com/opinion/TomFowdy.htm

Opinion articles reflect the views of their authors, not necessarily those of China.org.cn.

If you would like to contribute, please contact us at opinion@china.org.cn. 

Follow China.org.cn on Twitter and Facebook to join the conversation.
ChinaNews App Download
Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Enter the words you see:   
    Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产欧美一区二区三区视频在线观看| 实况360监控拍小两口| 亚洲欧洲精品成人久久曰影片| 精品国产va久久久久久久冰| 国产交换配偶在线视频| 欧美日韩高清性色生活片| 国产观看精品一区二区三区| а√最新版地址在线天堂| 成人黄色激情视频| 久久久久亚洲精品中文字幕| 李莫愁好紧好湿好滑| 亚洲国产高清视频在线观看| 激情偷乱人伦小说视频在线| 免费永久在线观看黄网站| 美女被免费网站91色| 国产乱子伦在线观看| 黄色三级在线播放| 国产欧美视频一区二区三区| 18美女私密尿口视频| 国产高潮国产高潮久久久| AAAAA级少妇高潮大片免费看| 成人影片麻豆国产影片免费观看| 久久久久久亚洲精品不卡| 日本精品一区二区三区在线视频一| 九九久久精品国产AV片国产 | 国产欧美日韩一区| sss欧美一区二区三区| 国产精品无码AV天天爽播放器| 99re热这里只有精品| 在线观看亚洲av每日更新| a级国产乱理伦片在线观| 婷婷丁香五月中文字幕| 一级特黄录像绵费播放| 成人久久精品一区二区三区| 中文字幕有码视频| 故意打开双腿让翁公看| 久久777国产线看观看精品| 日朝欧美亚洲精品| 久久99精品国产99久久6| 无码日韩AV一区二区三区| 久久www成人看片|