Taliban returns amid failure of US interference policy

By Jin Liangxiang
0 Comment(s)Print E-mail China.org.cn, August 18, 2021
Adjust font size:
Taliban militants are seen in Mehtarlam, capital of Laghman province, eastern Afghanistan, Aug. 15, 2021. [Photo/Xinhua]

The Taliban's return to power after 20 years is strong proof of the United States' failure in its policy of interference.

It is true that the U.S. initially launched the Afghanistan War in 2001 for the purpose of fighting al-Qaida terrorists in retaliation for the World Trade Center attacks, and overthrowing the rule of the Taliban, which was regarded as harboring Osama bin Laden and al-Qaida.

However, as events on the ground evolved, the U.S. shifted its purpose from counterterrorism to reconstructing the Afghan government. The U.S. not only overthrew the Taliban-led government in Afghanistan but also collected a group of people, who were politically pro-American and pro-Western. It was within this context that the interim government led by Hamid Karzai was established, with Karzai later formally elected as president. By then, the U.S. war on terror had shifted into one of interfering in the domestic affairs of another country – a signature move of the U.S.

Later on, American pundits even regarded controlling Afghanistan as part of a strategy to control the heartland of the Eurasian continent, considering the country's geopolitical position between central, western and south Asia. 

U.S. politicians and scholars always have beautiful words and theories when it comes to interference. They argue that in a globalized world, the domestic affairs and internal governance of one country could affect the interests of other countries. They also argue that the international community should not stand indifferent to issues facing sovereign nations when humanitarian crises occur. They can always find reasons to interfere.

Afghanistan is one example, but not the only one, that strongly proves America's failure in its policy of interference. It is true that the U.S. can easily find people to form a government in countries it targets, but this can never be a sustainable solution. In 2001, the U.S. had the power necessary to invest political, economic, diplomatic and military resources in Afghanistan. However, due to its failed investment in Afghanistan, the U.S. found that it could no longer afford the resources required to maintain the status quo there. 

The political establishment of the Afghan government was recognized by many countries thanks to U.S. diplomacy, but it failed to establish strong roots among the Afghan people, which is why the governance of former President Hamid Karzai never extended beyond the city of Kabul for years. Moreover, Afghan security forces have also been regarded as mercenaries of the United States, who would not fight when the U.S. withdrew its support. 

Afghanistan is also proof that American-style democracy cannot simply be inserted into countries with different cultural backgrounds. American democracy may have served to make the U.S. prosperous for some time, but it does not work in other cultural contexts. 

Why did the Afghan government and its security forces fail so quickly, not even launching a meaningful resistance against the Taliban's offensive? The reason is very simple: Different factions in the government would always play check-and-balance games, with one side always opposing the decisions made by the other. What they call democracy actually finally resulted in an absence of decisions and efficiency. Without efficiency and without authority, the failure of government is inevitable.

The latest developments have demonstrated the failure of the U.S. in Afghanistan. The U.S. has neither gained the geopolitical profits predicted by its previous decision-makers, nor duplicated its political system in a different culture. 

The U.S. policy of interference has caused suffering for millions of Afghans. The long-term political disturbance and instability have left many homeless or struggling due to a lack of food and medical supplies. Many even lost their lives. 

With the Taliban's return, it seems that the clock has been turned back to the year 2001. However, there are some differences: The Taliban is not as radical as it was, nor is it as isolated. 

What is most important right now is that countries in the region – or those which have been subject to interference – wake up from the dream of American-style democracy.

Jin Liangxiang is Senior Research Fellow with the Center for West Asian and African Studies, Shanghai Institutes for International Studies. For more information please visit:

http://www.ccgp-fushun.com/opinion/jinliangxiang.htm

Opinion articles reflect the views of their authors, not necessarily those of China.org.cn.

If you would like to contribute, please contact us at opinion@china.org.cn.

Follow China.org.cn on Twitter and Facebook to join the conversation.
ChinaNews App Download
Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Enter the words you see:   
    Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 欧美亚洲国产激情一区二区| 思思久久99热只有频精品66| 妖神记1000多章哪里看| 亚洲网站在线看| 久久精品99久久香蕉国产| 色欲香天天天综合网站| 女人扒开腿让男人桶| 亚洲欧美色一区二区三区| 456在线视频| 日本免费色视频| 午夜a级理论片在线播放| 888米奇在线视频四色| 欧美一区二区三区精华液| 国产一级性生活| 99久久精品费精品国产| 欧美乱妇高清无乱码在线观看| 亚洲色大情网站www| 黑人一级大毛片| 尹人香蕉久久99天天拍久女久| 亚洲AV高清在线观看一区二区| 美女一级毛片视频| 国产私拍福利精品视频推出| 久久婷婷五月综合97色一本一本 | 动漫美女被羞羞动漫小舞| 麻豆女神吴梦梦| 女人与公拘交酡过程高清视频 | 日本成人在线网址| 人妻体体内射精一区二区| 窝窝视频成人影院午夜在线| 成人a一级试看片| 乱子伦xxxx| 波多野结衣一二三区| 国产精品99久久精品爆乳| 3d动漫精品啪啪一区二区免费| 日本黄网站动漫视频免费| 全彩acg本子| 五月婷婷丁香六月| 少妇无码av无码专区在线观看| 亲密爱人在线观看韩剧完整版免费 | 亚洲国产成AV人天堂无码| 精品久久久久久亚洲综合网|