America struggles to stop a rash of mass shootings

By Sajjad Malik
0 Comment(s)Print E-mail China.org.cn, August 20, 2019
Adjust font size:
A college student takes part in a rally for gun control and anti-racism, in El Paso, Texas, the United States, Aug. 7, 2019. [Photo/Xinhua]

As the American politicians and experts were arguing yet again about how to put a lid on rampant gun violence, another shooting incident – in Philadelphia – further frayed public nerves. 

Luckily there wasn't any fatality; the injuries sustained by the six police officers were not life-threatening. The officers were trying to serve a drugs arrest warrant when the gunman started firing, resulting in a seven-hour stand-off before police managed to subdue the suspect, a white male. 

The Philadelphia shooting came on the heels of two deadly incidents of gun violence – in El Paso, Texas and Dayton, Ohio – killing more than 30 innocent people.

Faced with a seemingly endless series of mass shootings, the public are left wondering who to look to for succor. Nobody can provide a convincing answer why gun-wielding maniacs are left free to kill people at will. 

The three incidents detailed above once again spotlight the issue of gun control. 

As usual, American society is being torn apart by those determinedly supporting the constitutional right to bear arms and those opposing this idea and demanding some reasonable laws to try and keep guns out of the hands of fanatical killers. 

The pro-gun lobby base their stand on the Second Amendment to the U.S. constitution. "A well-regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed," reads that succinct piece of legislation ratified in 1791 as part of the Bill of Rights. 

A lot has been said and written about the objectives of the framers of the amendment in the crucial early years of the United States of America. The Supreme Court has also been called upon to deliver several rulings trying to interpret it.

Without going into that convoluted debate, a common view is that the amendment allows people to have weapons for self-defense or to use them for the defense of the state if needed. 

Common sense dictates that the amendment in no way provides any kind of justification to use the lethal weapons for mowing down people as we generally see in movies.  

Those who want to see an end to the gun violence do not necessarily ask for the entire amendment to be scrapped. Rather, the demand is that reasonable advance security checks should be a prerequisite for anyone being allowed to buy a gun. 

The powerful National Rifle Association (NRA), a gun rights advocacy group considered the main hurdle to any legislation, boasts millions of members, along with powerful links with politicians and industry. 

However, the law also prohibits using violence against unarmed people. So, why do elements within the NRA insisting on their gun rights ignore the rights to life and personal safety, also constitutionally guaranteed? 

However, the issue goes far beyond that argument. 

On the other side of the debate, we have the argument that guns per se don't kill. They are like any other weapons – a sword, a knife or an axe – that only become potentially lethal when wielded by individuals. 

We have seen many stabbing incidents around the world in recent times; people are been killed by simple weapons like a club. In older times, swords were considered as quite handy to target enemies. 

So, the problem is not just the automatic weapons, but must also focus on the ones holding them and pulling the trigger. As Americans debate curbs on buying guns and periodic checks on those possessing weapons, there is an urgent need to address the issue of mental health. 

On a wider level, the issue of culture of violence needs attention. We need to discourage behavior and actions that glorifies death and destruction. 

After the El Paso and Dayton shootings, President Donald Trump talked about reasonable checks to control guns. Any step towards it should be appreciated. 

But laws don't operate in isolation. Unless the American people and their elected representatives change their approach towards violence, they may have to witness more scenes of random mass shootings.  

Sajjad Malik is a columnist with China.org.cn. For more information please visit:

http://www.ccgp-fushun.com/opinion/SajjadMalik.htm

Opinion articles reflect the views of their authors, not necessarily those of China.org.cn.


If you would like to contribute, please contact us at opinion@china.org.cn.

Follow China.org.cn on Twitter and Facebook to join the conversation.
ChinaNews App Download
Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Enter the words you see:   
    Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产suv精品一区二区33| 国产精品久久久久免费视频| 久久久久久久久久国产精品免费| 欧美人与动牲交a欧美精品| 亚洲精品视频在线播放| 粗大的内捧猛烈进出视频| 国产18到20岁美女毛片| 992tv成人影院| 国产精品久久免费视频| 91精品啪在线观看国产91九色| 天干天干天啪啪夜爽爽AV| 中文字幕欧美激情| 日本精品在线观看视频| 亚洲αv在线精品糸列| 欧美粗大猛烈水多18p| 俄罗斯极品美女毛片免费播放| 精品国产国产综合精品| 国产aⅴ激情无码久久| 足鞋臭脚袜奴交小说h| 国产成人精品2021| 日本激情一区二区三区| 国产精品成在线观看| 720lu国产刺激在线观看| 在线A级毛片无码免费真人| www.av小四郎.com| 成年在线网站免费观看无广告| 久久久综合亚洲色一区二区三区| 日韩国产欧美在线观看一区二区| 亚洲av午夜成人片精品网站| 欧美丰满熟妇xxxxx| 亚洲区精品久久一区二区三区| 欧美日韩电影在线播放网| 亚洲短视频在线观看| 波多野结衣教师未删减版| 人妻少妇精品久久| 狠狠精品久久久无码中文字幕| 免费国产成人α片| 男女一进一出猛进式抽搐视频| 公和熄三级中字电影久久| 精品国精品自拍自在线| 午夜免费小视频|