End of INF and fear of a new arms race

By Sajjad Malik
0 Comment(s)Print E-mail China.org.cn, August 8, 2019
Adjust font size:
File photo taken on Dec. 8, 1987 shows US president Ronald Reagan and Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev signing the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty in the White House in Washington D.C., the United States. [Photo/Xinhua]

With the U.S. officially withdrawing from a key arms control treaty, a virtual no-holds-barred scenario has emerged if the leading powers want to acquire missiles previously banned. The result could be a devastating new race to build nuclear arsenals to the detriment of global security.

The Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty (INF) signed by Ronald Reagan and Mikhail Gorbachev in 1987 proved a remarkable agreement because it kept a lid on the construction and deployment of weapons in that particular category. 

The ban covered missiles in the 500-5,500 km range. The agreement was kept until the U.S. and NATO accused Russia of violating it and decided it was time to quit.  

Russian had denied reports that it was building a cruise missile violating treaty terms. However, this avowal was not accepted and the INF fell apart after expiry of the six-month notice period on August 2 when Washington duly stomped off. 

The end of restriction on developing intermediate range missiles could have long-term consequences for the world. The scramble to tip the strategic balance in their favor will lead countries to procure more lethal weapons in this category.

They are highly dangerous as they can be equipped with a nuclear head to hit targets not so far away, and where the response time for the target nation is limited, heightening the risk of unintended conflicts. 

Another aspect of the slow death of INF is lack of regard for disarmament treaties. Slowly but surely, important accords to cut back stockpiles of weapons are dying. For example, the Bush administration decided to withdraw thus killing the Anti-Ballistic Missile treaty in 2002.  

Yet another agreement of the Cold War era called the New Start treaty, limiting long-range nuclear missiles, is scheduled to expire in February 2021. There is little chance the parties involved will show a desire to renew it or reshape it according to the needs of the 21st century. 

The importance of such treaties can be judged from the fact that NATO and the former USSR under the INF banned all short and medium range ground-launched conventional and non-conventional missiles – though, sea-launched missile were exempted. 

The two sides also began to deactivate the missiles covered by the treaty and, by 1991, had destroyed nearly 2,700 such weapons. It was a huge success towards the end of the Cold War and a major step towards a safer world. 

One of the reasons for the U.S. to kill an important bilateral treaty is the emergence of new strategic realities. The global security order has been changing since the end of the USSR. It has been moving from a unipolar system dominated by the U.S. to a more devolved power-structure paradigm.

New power-centers are emerging and claiming a role. It is believed that, by withdrawing from the INF, the U.S. might try to come up with a new treaty to include other countries. 

It immediately reaps twin benefits: First, it is free to develop new weapons in the former banned category, and, second, urge others to come forward to achieve a new deal to stop their spread. 

However, it won't be easy to rope in new powers for a treaty that restricts their power of freedom to build weapons to address certain security needs. Inversely, a silent new arm race will start involving others beyond the U.S. and Russia. 

Until a new framework is designed to restrict the development of weapons covered by the defunct INF, it would be good for all stakeholders to follow a moratorium to avoid arms race and spread of such missiles. 

Sajjad Malik is a columnist with China.org.cn. For more information please visit:

http://www.ccgp-fushun.com/opinion/SajjadMalik.htm

Opinion articles reflect the views of their authors, not necessarily those of China.org.cn.


If you would like to contribute, please contact us at opinion@china.org.cn.

Follow China.org.cn on Twitter and Facebook to join the conversation.
ChinaNews App Download
Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Enter the words you see:   
    Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 夫妇交换性3中文字幕| 日韩在线一区二区三区免费视频 | 国产成人a毛片在线| 67194线路1(点击进入)| 天天躁日日躁狠狠躁欧美老妇| 中文字幕不卡在线高清| 日本精品一二三区| 亚洲av无码精品色午夜| 欧美成人精品第一区二区三区| 亚洲美女视频一区二区三区| 精品一二三区久久AAA片| 啊灬啊别停灬用力啊呻吟| 色天天躁夜夜躁天干天干| 国产在线一区二区三区av| 国模欢欢炮交150视频| 国产精品99久久免费观看| 337p色噜噜人体大胆欧美| 国模沟沟冒白浆视频福利| www夜夜操com| 成人午夜18免费看| 中文字幕第一页在线播放| 日本一道本高清免费| 久久国产精品免费专区| 日韩精品无码专区免费播放 | 已婚同事11p| 两个人看的www日本动漫 | 妲己高h荡肉呻吟np| 丁香伊人五月综合激激激| 成年丰满熟妇午夜免费视频 | 特级aaa毛片| 伊人久久久大香线蕉综合直播| 精品久久综合1区2区3区激情| 午夜网站在线观看| 美国式禁忌3在线观看| 又黄又大又爽免费视频| 美女羞羞喷液视频免费| 嘟嘟嘟www在线观看免费高清| 老外毛片免费视频播放| 国产AV一区二区三区无码野战| 草草影院www色欧美极品| 国产乱子伦精品免费无码专区|