Trump withdrawal from INF Treaty a bad move

By Sajjad Malik
0 Comment(s)Print E-mail China.org.cn, October 29, 2018
Adjust font size:

U.S. President Donald Trump (L) meets with his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin in Helsinki, Finland, on July 16, 2018. [Photo/Xinhua]

Donald Trump is living up to his reputation as a deal breaker, the latest agreement on his hit list being the historic Intermediate-Range Nuclear Force (INF) Treaty of 1987.

He has long shown his tremendous disapproval of the treaty, so it was really only a matter of time before he added it to the important international treaties from which the U.S. has withdrawn under his presidency.

His concerns about the INF related to a belief that Russia is violating it, while the U.S. has beenhamstrungby adherence to its terms and conditions. Another issue is that countries not a party to the treaty might forge ahead to developing their own intermediate range missiles, thus putting the United States at a serious disadvantage.

The INF was signed in Washington by Ronald Reagan and Mikhail Gorbachev after years of negotiations. It was a landmark achievement towards ending the Cold War and an effort to limit the spread of lethal weapons.

Under the agreement, the two super powers agreed to permanently eliminate ground-based ballistic and cruise missiles capable of hitting targets within a range of 500 to 5,500 kilometers. The treaty helped destroy an entire class of nuclear missiles and, in the process, saved the world from the horrors they threatened to unleash.

Trump's National Security Advisor John Bolton is believed to be the real force behind the decision to scrap the deal. He, more than anybody else in America, has been arguing for years in favor of ditching it.

During the George W. Bush administration, Bolton played a key role in American withdrawal from a treaty with Russia limiting antiballistic-missile systems and also from an agreement with North Korea to roll-back its nuclear program.

Already, his influence is detected in dumping the Iran nuclear deal, as he forcefully championed against the agreement made in 2015.

In declaring that the INF was dead, Trump said his predecessor Barack Obama should have pulled out years ago. Trump also lumped China with Russia by saying that the two countries were developing weapons while U.S. sat back to fulfill its INF obligations.

Trump also believes that an expanded and more comprehensive version of the INF can be negotiated by involving other countries so that an even-handed deal can be achieved to limit the spread of intermediate range missiles.

This seems somewhat plausible, as the equation of power distribution during the Cold War has changed. New players and power centers are emerging to play a more proactive role in international affairs, so their inclusion is required to address the threat of global arms race.

Any treaty aiming to curtail or banish deadly weapons should certainly include all countries with a capability or intention to develop and deploy such systems. The purpose should be broader elimination of arsenals instead of a narrow focus.

However, it's difficult to gain access to the thought processes of Trump and his close aides in order to understand why they are on the rampage in regard to commitments under multilateral agreements.

So far Trump administration has pulled out of important deals like Paris climate agreement, the Iran nuclear deal, the North America Free Trade Agreement and the Tran-Pacific Partnership.

The decision to challenge the utility of INF treaty is the latest but may not be the last. However, it will have serious ramifications for international peace and stability because it can trigger a new arms race.

Apart from the bilateral tension between the two nations, the spillover of fresh animosity will be felt in Europe as well as in Asia. It will also impact the economic and industrial health of the international community at a time when we need long-term peace and stability to fully recover from the hangover of 20th century conflicts.

If Trump genuinely thinks that INF is bad for the U.S., there should be an option to negotiate an additional protocol to strengthen it, than just killing the current arrangement. It is important to invest in building bilateral trust if U.S. and Russia are interested in a long-term peaceful relationship.

Sajjad Malik is a columnist with China.org.cn. For more information please visit:


http://www.ccgp-fushun.com/opinion/SajjadMalik.htm


Opinion articles reflect the views of their authors, not necessarily those of China.org.cn.

Follow China.org.cn on Twitter and Facebook to join the conversation.
ChinaNews App Download
Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Enter the words you see:   
    Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 午夜成年女人毛片免费观看| 国产欧美精品午夜在线播放| 中文在线观看永久免费| 樱桃视频影院在线观看| 亚洲精品成人a在线观看| 精品brazzers欧美教师| 成年片人免费www| 乱人伦人妻中文字幕在线入口| 欧美浮力第一页| 亲密爱人免费完整在线观看| 精品国产三上悠亚在线观看| 国产va免费精品观看精品| 高high肉文| 国产成 人 综合 亚洲专 | 97精品国产97久久久久久免费| 宅男噜66免费看网站| 中文字幕人妻偷伦在线视频| 日本大乳高潮视频在线观看| 久久综合久久久久88| 村上凉子丰满禁断五十路| 亚洲国产片在线观看| 欧美激情视频一区二区| 亚洲色精品vr一区二区三区| 看全色黄大色黄女片18女人| 午夜爽爽爽男女污污污网站| 老司机免费福利午夜入口ae58| 国产亚洲欧美日韩亚洲中文色| 黄色软件网站大全| 国产欧美日韩精品丝袜高跟鞋| 福利视频导航大全| 国产精品夜间视频香蕉| 4jzbtv四季彩app下载| 打桩机和他宝贝124是哪一对| 亚洲国产精品热久久| 欧美肥臀bbwbbwbbw| 亚洲色婷婷六月亚洲婷婷6月| 男人j进女人p视频免费观看| 免费人成黄页在线观看国产| 窝窝午夜色视频国产精品东北| 免费看污成人午夜网站| 福利视频你懂的|