The 'Indo-Pacific' in India-US relations

By Sajjad Malik
0 Comment(s)Print E-mail China.org.cn, September 16, 2018
Adjust font size:
(L to R) U.S. Secretary of Defense James Mattis, U.S. Secretary of State Michael R. Pompeo, Indian Minister of External Affairs Sushma Swaraj and Indian Defense Minister Nirmala Sitharaman deliver closing remarks at the 2+2 Dialogue in New Delhi, Sept. 6, 2018. [Photo courtesy of U.S. Department of State]

Top Indian and U.S. defence and foreign policy officials last week held the inaugural session of the much-hyped "2 plus 2" dialogue in New Delhi. It has further strengthened their bilateral relations and streamlined the ongoing consultations to cultivate closer strategic ties through a structured and institutional process. 

After going through the joint statement, issued at the end of the meeting, and the statement of India's External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj, the compelling conclusion one comes across is that from the U.S. perspective, the growing security relationship is about how to checkmate China in the Asia-Pacific region by actively engaging India and encouraging it to play a role.  

The Pacific region is quite important for the U.S. due to a variety of reasons. Rightly it has been trying to bring together more partners and supporters to bolster its position. India has shown a willingness to become part of this arrangement, as it not only provides an opportunity to access the latest Western defense technologies, but also an opportunity to share a platform with world powers. 

An interesting concept – also a terminology – of the "Indo-Pacific" has been added to the vocabulary of international relations and strategic politics. Though not entirely new, as the term has been used to denote the confluence of the Pacific and Indian oceans, the U.S. has changed its meaning by making it a point of reference for greater regional geo-political considerations.

The term Indo-Pacific has been more frequently employed by the Trump administration. His predecessor Barack Obama, despite having a soft spot for India, often preferred to use the term Asia-Pacific. Obama and Modi also used the "Asia-Pacific" in their joint statements in 2014 and 2015.

The 2017 National Security Strategy of the Trump administration describes the Indo-Pacific as a region where "a geopolitical competition between free and repressive visions of world order is taking place" and where allegedly "China is using economic inducements and penalties, influence operations, and implied military threats to persuade other states to heed its political and security agenda."

Here enters the idea of "freedom of seas and skies" vis-à-vis the Indo-Pacific. This concept is closely linked with China due to the South China Sea issue. By creating a perception of fear, India is being propped up as a regional power having legitimate security and economic interest in the Indo-Pacific region. 

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, after the "2 plus 2" dialogue, said that, "India and the United States have a natural starting point for advancing a free and open Indo-Pacific."

U.S. policy towards China is becoming clearer. On the one hand, tariffs are being imposed to offset the economic development and exports of China, and on the other hand it is being portrayed as a disruptive rising power that can threaten the free flow of trade and other commercial activities in the Indo-Pacific region.

The U.S. unease is understandable due to the challenges of the 21st century. But why is India entangling itself in the tricky regional power game? Traditionally, India maintained its non-aligned stance which served it well, though it suffered due to a lack of access to the latest military hardware from the West. 

The obligations of having a security alliance with the U.S. are often cumbersome and India might not be able to shoulder the burden. So, despite being drawn in to the inner circle of the U.S. system of allies, India will have to highlight the red lines – otherwise it will be soon thrown into the vortex of unnecessary conflicts from the Middle East to the Far East. 

India, being one of the fastest growing economies, cannot afford any kind of conflict. It needs a long period of peace for uninterrupted progress to reclaim its true position in the world and also to uplift millions of impoverished people.  

Indo-Pacific politics will get murkier in the long run, as the U.S. will try to offset the rise of China by all means, including pursuing the policy of containment. It may not be able to catch up China in the economic field but it can slow down its progress by creating roadblocks. 

India's long-term interest lies in having good ties with both China and the U.S. and not moving closer to one at the cost of ties with the other. It will have to avoid the lure of the "Indo-Pacific." 

Sajjad Malik is a columnist with China.org.cn. For more information please visit:


http://www.ccgp-fushun.com/opinion/SajjadMalik.htm


Opinion articles reflect the views of their authors, not necessarily those of China.org.cn.

Follow China.org.cn on Twitter and Facebook to join the conversation.
ChinaNews App Download
Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Enter the words you see:   
    Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产精品青青青高清在线| 欧美另类videovideosex| 日本xxxxx高清视频| 老司机在线精品| 国产精品91av| 97人洗澡人人澡人人爽人人模| 成人在线不卡视频| 久久久久成人精品无码| 最近中文字幕mv免费视频| 动漫女同性被吸乳羞羞漫画| 免费**毛片在线播放视| 800av我要打飞机| 夫妇当面交换中文字幕小说| 中文字幕亚洲激情| 日本bbwbbwbbw| 久久婷婷是五月综合色狠狠 | 久久综合狠狠综合久久综合88| 粗大猛烈进出高潮视频大全| 国产zzjjzzjj视频全免费| 香瓜七兄弟第二季| 国产成人综合色视频精品| aⅴ在线免费观看| 女生张开腿让男生通| 中文字幕亚洲精品无码| 无码天堂亚洲国产AV| 亚洲另类欧美日韩| 看免费的黄色片| 十七岁高清在线观看| 美女邪恶色动图gig27报| 中文字幕在线视频播放| 日本一道高清一区二区三区| 久久精品动漫一区二区三区| 曰本女人一级毛片看一级**| 亚洲AV无码乱码麻豆精品国产| 樱花动漫在线观看免费版| 亚洲国产成人精品女人久久久| 欧美极品在线观看| 亚洲导航深夜福利| 欧美日韩一区二区三区麻豆| 亚洲欧美日韩中文字幕网址| 欧美综合视频在线|