The 'Indo-Pacific' in India-US relations

By Sajjad Malik
0 Comment(s)Print E-mail China.org.cn, September 16, 2018
Adjust font size:
(L to R) U.S. Secretary of Defense James Mattis, U.S. Secretary of State Michael R. Pompeo, Indian Minister of External Affairs Sushma Swaraj and Indian Defense Minister Nirmala Sitharaman deliver closing remarks at the 2+2 Dialogue in New Delhi, Sept. 6, 2018. [Photo courtesy of U.S. Department of State]

Top Indian and U.S. defence and foreign policy officials last week held the inaugural session of the much-hyped "2 plus 2" dialogue in New Delhi. It has further strengthened their bilateral relations and streamlined the ongoing consultations to cultivate closer strategic ties through a structured and institutional process. 

After going through the joint statement, issued at the end of the meeting, and the statement of India's External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj, the compelling conclusion one comes across is that from the U.S. perspective, the growing security relationship is about how to checkmate China in the Asia-Pacific region by actively engaging India and encouraging it to play a role.  

The Pacific region is quite important for the U.S. due to a variety of reasons. Rightly it has been trying to bring together more partners and supporters to bolster its position. India has shown a willingness to become part of this arrangement, as it not only provides an opportunity to access the latest Western defense technologies, but also an opportunity to share a platform with world powers. 

An interesting concept – also a terminology – of the "Indo-Pacific" has been added to the vocabulary of international relations and strategic politics. Though not entirely new, as the term has been used to denote the confluence of the Pacific and Indian oceans, the U.S. has changed its meaning by making it a point of reference for greater regional geo-political considerations.

The term Indo-Pacific has been more frequently employed by the Trump administration. His predecessor Barack Obama, despite having a soft spot for India, often preferred to use the term Asia-Pacific. Obama and Modi also used the "Asia-Pacific" in their joint statements in 2014 and 2015.

The 2017 National Security Strategy of the Trump administration describes the Indo-Pacific as a region where "a geopolitical competition between free and repressive visions of world order is taking place" and where allegedly "China is using economic inducements and penalties, influence operations, and implied military threats to persuade other states to heed its political and security agenda."

Here enters the idea of "freedom of seas and skies" vis-à-vis the Indo-Pacific. This concept is closely linked with China due to the South China Sea issue. By creating a perception of fear, India is being propped up as a regional power having legitimate security and economic interest in the Indo-Pacific region. 

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, after the "2 plus 2" dialogue, said that, "India and the United States have a natural starting point for advancing a free and open Indo-Pacific."

U.S. policy towards China is becoming clearer. On the one hand, tariffs are being imposed to offset the economic development and exports of China, and on the other hand it is being portrayed as a disruptive rising power that can threaten the free flow of trade and other commercial activities in the Indo-Pacific region.

The U.S. unease is understandable due to the challenges of the 21st century. But why is India entangling itself in the tricky regional power game? Traditionally, India maintained its non-aligned stance which served it well, though it suffered due to a lack of access to the latest military hardware from the West. 

The obligations of having a security alliance with the U.S. are often cumbersome and India might not be able to shoulder the burden. So, despite being drawn in to the inner circle of the U.S. system of allies, India will have to highlight the red lines – otherwise it will be soon thrown into the vortex of unnecessary conflicts from the Middle East to the Far East. 

India, being one of the fastest growing economies, cannot afford any kind of conflict. It needs a long period of peace for uninterrupted progress to reclaim its true position in the world and also to uplift millions of impoverished people.  

Indo-Pacific politics will get murkier in the long run, as the U.S. will try to offset the rise of China by all means, including pursuing the policy of containment. It may not be able to catch up China in the economic field but it can slow down its progress by creating roadblocks. 

India's long-term interest lies in having good ties with both China and the U.S. and not moving closer to one at the cost of ties with the other. It will have to avoid the lure of the "Indo-Pacific." 

Sajjad Malik is a columnist with China.org.cn. For more information please visit:


http://www.ccgp-fushun.com/opinion/SajjadMalik.htm


Opinion articles reflect the views of their authors, not necessarily those of China.org.cn.

Follow China.org.cn on Twitter and Facebook to join the conversation.
ChinaNews App Download
Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Enter the words you see:   
    Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产欧美日韩综合精品二区| 成人午夜短视频| 国产欧美一区二区三区观看 | 国产成人精品综合久久久久| 8x8×在线永久免费视频| 最新版天堂中文在线| 又爽又黄又无遮挡的视频| 67194线路1(点击进入)| 拨牐拨牐x8免费| 久久精品国产亚洲7777| 欧美一级夜夜爽视频| 啦啦啦手机完整免费高清观看| 六月丁香婷婷综合| 日韩午夜激情视频| 亚洲网站在线看| 精品国产三级a在线观看| 国产男女猛烈无遮挡| 一级毛片无毒不卡直接观看| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全8| 亚洲欧洲精品久久| 精品视频一区二区三区四区| 国产精品久久久久久久久| 91短视频在线免费观看| 手机在线看片你懂得| 亚洲欧洲日本在线| 熟妇人妻videos| 国产三级小视频在线观看| 91欧美精品综合在线观看| 夜夜揉揉日日人人| 久久久精品人妻一区亚美研究所| 模特冰漪丰硕之美1| 伊人五月天婷婷| 蜜桃精品免费久久久久影院| 国产馆手机在线观看| 99热国产免费| 无码日韩人妻精品久久| 亚洲av无码日韩av无码网站冲| 精品国产免费一区二区三区 | bt自拍另类综合欧美| 日韩专区第一页| 久久精品国产亚洲AV无码麻豆|