Pax Sinica in Africa?

By Sumantra Maitra
0 Comment(s)Print E-mail China.org.cn, September 13, 2018
Adjust font size:
Photo taken on Aug. 28, 2018 shows a parterre to greet the 2018 Beijing summit of the Forum on China-Africa Cooperation (FOCAC). [Photo/Xinhua]

When I was a rookie journalist, one of my colleagues got a Confucius scholarship to study Chinese in Africa. Intending to work in trade between China and Africa, he raised some eyebrows among other friends who couldn't understand a Chinese desire to invest in Africa or African support for it. 

The recent summit of the Forum on China-Africa Cooperation (FOCAC) reminds me of that old debates. Is it the dawn of Pax Sinica in Africa? If so, how should Western states compete with China in Africa and what benefits does Africa gain from Chinese investment? 

Some Westerners are talking of a "Chinese Marshall Plan" for Africa, after the Forum saw China pledge another US$60 billion, the same amount it promised in 2015. It has also led to a lot of soul searching, and teeth gnashing, in certain sectors, as Africa is seen as a new battleground of geopolitical rivalry and great power politics. However, these are half-baked concerns that don't stand up to scrutiny. 

Consider the significant advantage China has in doing business in this region. China has kept humanitarian interference to a minimum. When African leaders say that China-Africa relations are based on equality, it raises sniggers in the West. After all Chinese economic heft is gigantic compared to any average African economy. 

However, that is a false premise to start with. First of all, when African leaders say that they feel equal in China, they are hinting at the West lecturing them about human rights, culture and governance systems. For a region that was historically subjected to colonialism, any foreign lecturing of this sort faces this unhappy legacy. 

The foreign policy and even financial aid in the West is tied up with human rights concern, and democratic values, something inherently seen as liberal and progressive in the West but quasi-Imperial in the global south. 

Of course, not every Western policymaker wants that, and there are sections of academia who are continuously calling for the West to change the model from human rights-based rebukes and aid to a more cooperative investment type. However, they are a minority. 

Compare that with the "Five No" plan of China, as espoused by President Xi Jinping. China has ruled out any attachment of political conditions to aid offers, any interference in internal affairs or system of governance, any imposition of force, or any interference in development. 

The approach of China towards Africa, which takes away any external interference, or even element of pious lecturing about what path of development and governance Africans should follow, removes the fundamental skepticism about Chinese military boots being tied to aid money. It also follows a basic truth of geopolitics: a region should have political systems based on regional peculiarities and culture, and the imposition of foreign values does more harm than good. 

Finally, the Chinese development model relies on investment, instead of aid. As Zambian economist Dambisa Moyo wrote in her 2010 book "Dead Aid," any form of aid only goes to a specific sector of African politics, and actually cuts off internal development. Investment, on the other hand, is a fundamentally better model as it stabilizes regions by providing jobs. 

Western foreign aid essentially goes to African leaders through NGOs, with chances of the money being channelized to rigged areas. Investment is a bottom-up approach instead of a top-down one. The observed social and political results are phenomenal. The number of African student exchanges in China keeps increasing, and African leaders are steadily jumping on the band wagon to strengthen ties with the Asian power. 

However, there's one thing that sooner or later Chinese policymakers will have to think about. The threat of terrorism, and security threats to interests in Africa will grow and continue to increase. There might be a moment when China has to face a decision on whether to secure its interests in the region, and everyone needs to be prepared for that. 

Overall, however, the FOCA 2018 summit continued to be a platform for economic and geopolitical benefit for both China and Africa. Non-interference coupled with investment is the way forward. 

Sumantra Maitra is a columnist with China.org.cn. For more information please visit:


http://www.ccgp-fushun.com/opinion/SumantraMaitra.htm


Opinion articles reflect the views of their authors only, not necessarily those of China.org.cn.

Follow China.org.cn on Twitter and Facebook to join the conversation.
ChinaNews App Download
Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Enter the words you see:   
    Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 韩国v欧美v亚洲v日本v| aaa毛片视频免费观看| 最新69国产成人精品免费视频动漫 | 卡通动漫第一页综合专区| 马浩宁高考考了多少分| 好男人在线视频www官网| 亚洲人成亚洲精品| 波多野结衣与老人公569| 免费无码国产V片在线观看| 色天天综合久久久久综合片| 国产成人午夜高潮毛片| lover视频无删减免费观看| 成在线人AV免费无码高潮喷水| 亚洲成a人片毛片在线| 玩弄丰满少妇人妻视频| 农村老熟妇乱子伦视频| 黑人巨鞭大战洋妞| 天天射综合网站| 三年片在线影院| 最新在线中文字幕| 亚洲成av人片在线观看www| 激情内射日本一区二区三区| 免费观看无遮挡www的视频| 欧美jizz18性欧美| 国产精品老熟女露脸视频| 99re热这里有精品首页视频| 天天爱天天操天天射| らだ天堂√在线中文www| 日韩亚洲欧美综合| 亚洲欧美成人综合久久久| 狠狠躁日日躁夜夜躁2020 | 97久久精品亚洲中文字幕无码| 日本xxxwww| 久久夜色精品国产嚕嚕亚洲av | 四虎1515hh永久久免费| 色婷婷亚洲一区二区三区| 国产一国产一级毛片视频| 色综合综合在线| 国产一级片播放| 84pao强力永久免费高清| 欧美一级中文字幕|