Pax Sinica in Africa?

By Sumantra Maitra
0 Comment(s)Print E-mail China.org.cn, September 13, 2018
Adjust font size:
Photo taken on Aug. 28, 2018 shows a parterre to greet the 2018 Beijing summit of the Forum on China-Africa Cooperation (FOCAC). [Photo/Xinhua]

When I was a rookie journalist, one of my colleagues got a Confucius scholarship to study Chinese in Africa. Intending to work in trade between China and Africa, he raised some eyebrows among other friends who couldn't understand a Chinese desire to invest in Africa or African support for it. 

The recent summit of the Forum on China-Africa Cooperation (FOCAC) reminds me of that old debates. Is it the dawn of Pax Sinica in Africa? If so, how should Western states compete with China in Africa and what benefits does Africa gain from Chinese investment? 

Some Westerners are talking of a "Chinese Marshall Plan" for Africa, after the Forum saw China pledge another US$60 billion, the same amount it promised in 2015. It has also led to a lot of soul searching, and teeth gnashing, in certain sectors, as Africa is seen as a new battleground of geopolitical rivalry and great power politics. However, these are half-baked concerns that don't stand up to scrutiny. 

Consider the significant advantage China has in doing business in this region. China has kept humanitarian interference to a minimum. When African leaders say that China-Africa relations are based on equality, it raises sniggers in the West. After all Chinese economic heft is gigantic compared to any average African economy. 

However, that is a false premise to start with. First of all, when African leaders say that they feel equal in China, they are hinting at the West lecturing them about human rights, culture and governance systems. For a region that was historically subjected to colonialism, any foreign lecturing of this sort faces this unhappy legacy. 

The foreign policy and even financial aid in the West is tied up with human rights concern, and democratic values, something inherently seen as liberal and progressive in the West but quasi-Imperial in the global south. 

Of course, not every Western policymaker wants that, and there are sections of academia who are continuously calling for the West to change the model from human rights-based rebukes and aid to a more cooperative investment type. However, they are a minority. 

Compare that with the "Five No" plan of China, as espoused by President Xi Jinping. China has ruled out any attachment of political conditions to aid offers, any interference in internal affairs or system of governance, any imposition of force, or any interference in development. 

The approach of China towards Africa, which takes away any external interference, or even element of pious lecturing about what path of development and governance Africans should follow, removes the fundamental skepticism about Chinese military boots being tied to aid money. It also follows a basic truth of geopolitics: a region should have political systems based on regional peculiarities and culture, and the imposition of foreign values does more harm than good. 

Finally, the Chinese development model relies on investment, instead of aid. As Zambian economist Dambisa Moyo wrote in her 2010 book "Dead Aid," any form of aid only goes to a specific sector of African politics, and actually cuts off internal development. Investment, on the other hand, is a fundamentally better model as it stabilizes regions by providing jobs. 

Western foreign aid essentially goes to African leaders through NGOs, with chances of the money being channelized to rigged areas. Investment is a bottom-up approach instead of a top-down one. The observed social and political results are phenomenal. The number of African student exchanges in China keeps increasing, and African leaders are steadily jumping on the band wagon to strengthen ties with the Asian power. 

However, there's one thing that sooner or later Chinese policymakers will have to think about. The threat of terrorism, and security threats to interests in Africa will grow and continue to increase. There might be a moment when China has to face a decision on whether to secure its interests in the region, and everyone needs to be prepared for that. 

Overall, however, the FOCA 2018 summit continued to be a platform for economic and geopolitical benefit for both China and Africa. Non-interference coupled with investment is the way forward. 

Sumantra Maitra is a columnist with China.org.cn. For more information please visit:


http://www.ccgp-fushun.com/opinion/SumantraMaitra.htm


Opinion articles reflect the views of their authors only, not necessarily those of China.org.cn.

Follow China.org.cn on Twitter and Facebook to join the conversation.
ChinaNews App Download
Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Enter the words you see:   
    Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲精品自在在线观看| 国产中文字幕在线播放| A∨变态另类天堂无码专区| 成年视频在线播放| 久久国产色av| 欧美v在线观看| 亚洲深深色噜噜狠狠爱网站| 男女一级做片a性视频| 北条麻妃在线一区二区| 脱顶胖熊老头同性tv| 国产伦精品一区二区三区视频小说| 狠狠色综合色区| 国产精品午夜高清在线观看| 97一区二区三区四区久久| 天堂资源bt种子在线| а天堂中文在线官网在线| 成人性生交大片免费视频| 久久99热精品免费观看牛牛| 日本无卡码免费一区二区三区| 久久综合九色综合欧美狠狠| 机机对机机的30分钟免费软件| 亚洲国产成人久久一区二区三区| 欧美激情免费观看一区| 亚洲精品第一国产综合野| 狠狠躁天天躁无码中文字幕| 免费看片在线观看| 精品久久无码中文字幕| 内射一区二区精品视频在线观看| 美女18一级毛片免费看| 噜噜噜噜私人影院| 老司机69精品成免费视频| 国产一区二区四区在线观看| 草久视频在线观看| 国产丰满麻豆videossexhd| 要灬要灬再深点受不了好舒服| 国产午夜无码精品免费看动漫| 高嫁肉柳风车动漫| 国产免费牲交视频| 视频一区二区三区在线观看| 国产亚洲福利精品一区二区| 蝌蚪网站免费观看|