Stabilizing Afghanistan calls for the involvement of regional powers

By Sumantra Maitra
0 Comment(s)Print E-mail China.org.cn, April 29, 2018
Adjust font size:

Afghan capital Kabul [Photo/Xinhua]


In the run up to Soviet intervention in Afghanistan in 1979, the politburo met to discuss whether the time was right to send in troops or whether to simply help the Afghan government with funds and weapons to deal with their problems the way they were supposed to be dealt with. There were realists in the Soviet administration who were skeptical of an invasion, and confident that the Soviets wouldn't be able to come out of Afghanistan that easily. Unfortunately, they didn't prevail – and the rest, as they say, is history. The Soviet Union went bankrupt, and lost over 15,000 lives, trying to stabilize Afghanistan. 

As I read news of ISIS blowing up 50 random people in an election sector in Kabul, I remember this archival history. The war and counter-insurgency in Afghanistan have been going on since 2001, but the writ of the government lies only in Kabul and some other urban centers. The Taliban is growing and is at its strongest since 2004, when major U.S. forces started to be diverted to the Middle East. And the domestic government is as weak as ever. Since 2001, the U.S. has spent over 500 billion dollars annually, trying to stabilize Afghanistan. 

But the plan was wrong from the start. The regional great powers like India, Pakistan and Iran have their own security interests, which are divergent and often confrontational. The U.S. also relied on the heavy-handed promotion of democracy, trying to establish foreign norms in a society which remains deeply tribal and sectarian. They also disbanded all militias which were based on sectarian loyalties, and which were intrinsic in stabilizing parts of the country; and that, especially, has been a major disaster. These militias and local tribes, which have their own cultures and norms, and are led by people they deeply care about, are loyal to their own. The idea of modern representative democracy is alien in these places, and as such, it is baffling to attempt promote modern norms by external forces. But with these tribes and forces neutered, the only forces which command loyalty are based either on ethnicity, like the Taliban, or on religion, like ISIS. 

Recent research points to a completely different method, which is unfortunately ignored by the West. The research suggests not to force norms, but rather to encourage local leaders to stabilize and promote order, in whichever means necessary. In simpler words, sometimes external powers should focus on stability, rather than values, and promote order over chaos. That would lead to a stable country, and would in turn naturally help further development. A contrasting example is Chinese investment in Africa, which does not force African governments to adhere to Chinese social culture. 

The situation in Afghanistan is tricky. It remains a graveyard of empires, having led to overreach by the Persians, the Mughals, the British, the Soviets and now the Americans. It is important to understand that local leaders have a huge stake in the stability of the region. It is also important to understand that the United States won't be there for long. The local actors know that, and in a waiting game, the external power will always lose. American taxpayers cannot afford to continue to fund Afghanistan as a province whose governance is borne solely by the United States. 

The Indian Prime Minister Modi is about to meet with President Xi. As per Indian strategic circles, PM Modi wants to display that China and India have overlapping interests in South Asia, the Indian Ocean and the Indo-Pacific and that there is "an urgency to align our world views through a broader across-the-board dialogue." I cannot think of a better idea than discussing the inevitable prospect of a post-American Afghanistan, which is a factor of immense importance to both India and China, not just for security and terrorism issues, but also economic issues. Stabilizing Afghanistan calls for a new approach, most importantly the cooperation of the regional giants. 

Sumantra Maitra is a columnist with China.org.cn. For more information please visit:


http://www.ccgp-fushun.com/opinion/SumantraMaitra.htm


Opinion articles reflect the views of their authors only, not necessarily those of China.org.cn.

Follow China.org.cn on Twitter and Facebook to join the conversation.
ChinaNews App Download
Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Enter the words you see:   
    Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 天天在线天天综合网色| 一二三四日本高清社区5| 欧美亚洲综合视频| 亚洲综合伊人久久大杳蕉| 精品国产三级a∨在线| 国产一级三级三级在线视| 九九影院理论片在线观看一级| 国产麻豆天美果冻无码视频| videsgratis欧美另类| 成人免费看片又大又黄| 久久久免费的精品| 曰韩无码无遮挡a级毛片| 亚洲国产欧美久久香综合| 毛茸茸性XXXX毛茸茸毛茸茸| 免费大片av手机看片| 美女大黄三级视频在线观看| 国产亚洲av片在线观看18女人| 黄色网站小视频| 国产精品99久久久久久人| 69tang在线观看| 国语对白刺激做受xxxxx在线| jizz黄色片| 娜露温泉无删减视频在线看 | 国产精品久久毛片| 4408私人影院| 国产黄在线观看免费观看不卡| AAA日本高清在线播放免费观看| 奶大灬舒服灬太大了一进一出 | 黄色三级理沦片| 国产欧美亚洲精品a第一页| 亚洲五月激情网| 国产精品久久久久久搜索| 1024视频基地| 国产精品国产香蕉在线观看网| 69福利视频一区二区| 国产美女久久久久| 91精品免费国产高清在线| 国产麻豆剧果冻传媒免精品费网站 | 不用付费的黄色软件| 成人试看120秒体验区| 中文字幕亚洲欧美日韩不卡 |