?Bombing won't save Syria

By Sumantra Maitra
0 Comment(s)Print E-mail China.org.cn, April 17, 2018
Adjust font size:

Syria [Photo/Xinhua]

Perhaps the most repulsive, pervasive myth of the Syrian civil war is the idea that the West "did nothing" and let the slaughter continue. In reality, however, there has been an intervention going on since 2011. The West tried intervention and nation building in Iraq and failed, then tried intervention and non-nation building in Libya, and that ended in disaster. Syria was different. Assad had Russia and Iran to fall back on – allies, which Saddam and Gaddafi lacked. And the Obama administration didn't calculate that Russia would intervene in favor of Assad to save their naval base in the Mediterranean. It was a strategic miscalculation, as this is the first time the interventionists faced a resistance from another great power. 

As Britain, France and the United States bomb Syria for an alleged chemical weapons attack, this history is worth repeating. In the most boneheaded policy ever promoted by any Western government, it was Obama's call for Assad to step down that started this crisis. The rebels were supplied with Qatari- and Saudi-funded weaponry, and given diplomatic support by Israel, Turkey and the West. Assad was bolstered by Iran and Russia, both wary of losing their influence in the vast stretch of land extending to the Mediterranean basin. The result has been untold suffering, and it continues. Anyone now shedding tears about the humanitarian crisis needs to remember that none of this would have happened if the Syrian rebels were not armed by the forces which are opposed to Iran and Assad. There would be no revolution, much less a civil war. 

This has been a pattern: to instigate trouble in places and then intervene. Except, in Syria and Ukraine, Russia had naval bases, and decided to put its foot down rather than risk losing it. 

The strikes are, needless to mention, on shady legal ground. There were no U.N. votes. There was no U.N. mandate. The Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons didn't have time to do their investigation before the strikes were called in. The legality of the strikes is dubious and lacks any measurable legitimacy, rendering the constant claim that rule of law is important in international relations hollow. International law remains at the mercy of great power whims. 

More interesting was the painstaking work from the Brits, French and Americans to notify Russia. No strikes were done near any Russian base, whether in Tartus, Latakia or Khmeimim. The French notified the Russians beforehand for deconfliction, and it is quite possible that that info was conveyed to Assad. It is simply a way to let Assad know that the West is helpless and has to strike, but as long as chemical weapons are not used, Assad can continue to win the war – which he is winning anyway. 

The West has no appetite for a long-term intervention in the Middle East. Assad and Russia know that as well, which is why it is baffling that Assad used these chemical weapons. It defies logic. If I were a military commander advising Assad, why would I tell him to do the one single thing that would bring about Western military intervention? That's not a question I alone ask, but a question taken up by sensible thinkers in the West, including former naval commanders like Admiral Lord West of the United Kingdom. 

Ultimately, this bombing didn't serve its intended purpose, and only showed how constrained the options are. It is a signal to Assad and the Russians that no one in the West is interested in Syria, and it is merely optics for domestic purposes. It also showed that international laws are meant only to be broken. Finally, it showed that deterrence doesn't really work, and will perhaps not stop the use of chemical weapons in the future either. It was just a waste of cash, a gigantic virtue signaling, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.

Sumantra Maitra is a columnist with China.org.cn. For more information please visit:


http://www.ccgp-fushun.com/opinion/SumantraMaitra.htm


Opinion articles reflect the views of their authors only, not necessarily those of China.org.cn.


Follow China.org.cn on Twitter and Facebook to join the conversation.
ChinaNews App Download
Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Enter the words you see:   
    Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 中文字幕一区二区精品区| 亚洲人成电影网站| 下面一进一出好爽视频| 欧美高清视频www夜色资源| 六月丁香综合网| 色妞色视频一区二区三区四区| 国产精品igao视频| 91国内揄拍国内精品对白不卡| 天天干天天干天天干天天干天天干| 丁香色欲久久久久久综合网| 无码国内精品人妻少妇蜜桃视频| 亚洲国产精品嫩草影院久久| 翁熄止痒婉艳隔壁老李头| 国产成人无码精品一区不卡| 中文字幕第四页| 妖精的尾巴ova| 中文字幕久精品免费视频| 日本一卡2卡3卡4卡无卡免费 | 波多野结衣教师系列5| 免费jizz在线播放视频高清版| 黄页网址大全免费观看22| 女同午夜三级在线观看| 久久婷婷激情综合色综合俺也去| 污视频网站免费在线观看| 国产一区二三区| 1024香蕉视频| 国产精品多p对白交换绿帽| 一级一级一级毛片| 成年人在线看片| 丰满少妇人妻久久久久久| 日本妇人成熟免费不卡片| 久久婷婷国产综合精品| 日韩激情中文字幕一区二区| 亚洲网站在线播放| 男人进的越深越爽动态图| 免费无毒A网站在线观看| 精品久久久久不卡无毒| 国产人成视频在线观看| 高清欧美一区二区三区| 国产又色又爽又刺激视频| 青青草免费在线视频|