A policy of open scientific data sharing benefits all

By Richard de Grijs
0 Comment(s)Print E-mail China.org.cn, July 30, 2017
Adjust font size:

China’s first X-ray space telescope [File photo]



The other day, reading a headline in the China Daily, “Data of China’s first X-ray space telescope to be open to global scientists,” I was both surprised and somewhat concerned.

Surprised, because it is international best practice in science to share data with anyone, no matter what their institutional affiliation, nationality or geographical location. I had therefore expected no less than an open and transparent data policy from the team running the Hard X-ray Modulation Telescope (HXMT), nicknamed Insight.

Concerned, because the headline implied that scientific policy makers apparently thought such openness was novel. It is not; open data sharing has been the international norm in the field of space science since the first scientific missions supported by NASA and the European Space Agency (ESA).

Of course, commercial and national security interests can preclude some open data-sharing, but an X-ray satellite designed to explore distant celestial objects to better understand their nature – including that of the massive “black holes” at the centers of many nearby galaxies – hardly pose a threat to national security.

This policy of openness – both in terms of data availability and data acquisition – has been enormously beneficial to both NASA and ESA. Their joint project, the Hubble Space Telescope, is arguably the most productive scientific instrument ever built.

Its productivity is due largely to the way it offers unrestricted access to anyone with a great idea – the competition is fierce, with “oversubscription rates” by factors of eight or more; however, if your idea is ground-breaking, it doesn’t matter where you are based.

The students and junior researchers in my team at Peking University routinely use Hubble observations that have languished in its Data Archive for years, perhaps never explored or used for other purposes.

The age of observational data in astrophysics doesn’t matter; the novelty of the results does – and by using years-old Hubble data, we have managed to publish a number of ground-breaking discoveries in prestigious journals like Nature.

Of course, we get the academic credit for those discoveries, but both space agencies also get what they hoped for: more publicity and a confirmation of their cutting-edge status.

Such are indeed the prospects for the X-ray observations the Insight module will obtain as well. No matter who publishes their scientific results, the eventual kudos go to the Chinese team responsible for the satellite’s development and operation.

By international norms, the scientists involved understand their data, as well as that obtained for any other scientist whose proposal is accepted, will be theirs for just a year, the ‘proprietary’ period.

For so-called “survey” facilities, like ESA’s current flagship mission Gaia (which will revolutionize studies and understanding of our own Milky Way galaxy), the timeline is somewhat different. Their data will still be made publicly available, but through annual data releases; the first Gaia release happened just recently.

So, my concern when reading the newspaper headline was that it might indicate an underlying reluctance by the scientific policymakers responsible for Chinese space missions to truly embrace a spirit of international openness. This would send a poor message about the scientific community on which I consider myself an integral and active member.

Fortunately, upon reading the full article, I was reassured that Chinese space scientists indeed want to contribute their novel achievements in high technology to the international community.

Perhaps it was just the headline writer who didn’t quite understand the potentially negative implication of his words. By joining forces with the greatest minds, scientific progress becomes ever more promising.

Richard de Grijs is a columnist with China.org.cn. For more information please visit:

http://www.ccgp-fushun.com/opinion/RicharddeGrijs.htm

Opinion articles reflect the views of their authors, not necessarily those of China.org.cn.

 

Follow China.org.cn on Twitter and Facebook to join the conversation.
ChinaNews App Download
Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Enter the words you see:   
    Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 四虎影视永久免费观看地址| 国产精品嫩草影院永久一| 久久久久777777人人人视频| 欧美怡红院成免费人忱友;| 交换交换乱杂烩系列yy| 一区二区三区国产最好的精华液| 日本护士xxxx视频| 亚洲va中文字幕无码毛片| 欧美日韩在线视频一区| 四虎影视成人永久在线播放| 麻豆狠色伊人亚洲综合网站| 国产精品免费拍拍1000部| 91嫩草视频在线观看| 无翼乌全彩里番蛇姬本子| 久久精品国产一区二区电影| 欧式午夜理伦三级在线观看| 午夜不卡av免费| 色噜噜狠狠一区二区三区果冻| 国产精品自在自线免费观看| 久久久久国色av免费看| 日韩电影免费在线观看中文字幕| 亚洲色大成网站WWW尤物| 精品亚洲综合久久中文字幕| 国产成人无码专区| 亚洲va欧美va| 大狠狠大臿蕉香蕉大视频| 一区二区三区欧美| 尤物久久99热国产综合| 两个小孩一起差差| 旧里番yy4480在线高清影院| 亚洲精品字幕在线观看| 看国产黄大片在线观看| 公交车老师屁股迎合我摩擦 | 蜜桃视频无码区在线观看| 国内精品一区二区三区最新 | 女神们的丝袜脚战争h| 久久午夜无码鲁丝片午夜精品| 日韩高清国产一区在线| 么公又大又硬又粗又爽视频| 晓雪老师下面好紧好湿| 乖帮我拉开拉链它想你|