A policy of open scientific data sharing benefits all

By Richard de Grijs
0 Comment(s)Print E-mail China.org.cn, July 30, 2017
Adjust font size:

China’s first X-ray space telescope [File photo]



The other day, reading a headline in the China Daily, “Data of China’s first X-ray space telescope to be open to global scientists,” I was both surprised and somewhat concerned.

Surprised, because it is international best practice in science to share data with anyone, no matter what their institutional affiliation, nationality or geographical location. I had therefore expected no less than an open and transparent data policy from the team running the Hard X-ray Modulation Telescope (HXMT), nicknamed Insight.

Concerned, because the headline implied that scientific policy makers apparently thought such openness was novel. It is not; open data sharing has been the international norm in the field of space science since the first scientific missions supported by NASA and the European Space Agency (ESA).

Of course, commercial and national security interests can preclude some open data-sharing, but an X-ray satellite designed to explore distant celestial objects to better understand their nature – including that of the massive “black holes” at the centers of many nearby galaxies – hardly pose a threat to national security.

This policy of openness – both in terms of data availability and data acquisition – has been enormously beneficial to both NASA and ESA. Their joint project, the Hubble Space Telescope, is arguably the most productive scientific instrument ever built.

Its productivity is due largely to the way it offers unrestricted access to anyone with a great idea – the competition is fierce, with “oversubscription rates” by factors of eight or more; however, if your idea is ground-breaking, it doesn’t matter where you are based.

The students and junior researchers in my team at Peking University routinely use Hubble observations that have languished in its Data Archive for years, perhaps never explored or used for other purposes.

The age of observational data in astrophysics doesn’t matter; the novelty of the results does – and by using years-old Hubble data, we have managed to publish a number of ground-breaking discoveries in prestigious journals like Nature.

Of course, we get the academic credit for those discoveries, but both space agencies also get what they hoped for: more publicity and a confirmation of their cutting-edge status.

Such are indeed the prospects for the X-ray observations the Insight module will obtain as well. No matter who publishes their scientific results, the eventual kudos go to the Chinese team responsible for the satellite’s development and operation.

By international norms, the scientists involved understand their data, as well as that obtained for any other scientist whose proposal is accepted, will be theirs for just a year, the ‘proprietary’ period.

For so-called “survey” facilities, like ESA’s current flagship mission Gaia (which will revolutionize studies and understanding of our own Milky Way galaxy), the timeline is somewhat different. Their data will still be made publicly available, but through annual data releases; the first Gaia release happened just recently.

So, my concern when reading the newspaper headline was that it might indicate an underlying reluctance by the scientific policymakers responsible for Chinese space missions to truly embrace a spirit of international openness. This would send a poor message about the scientific community on which I consider myself an integral and active member.

Fortunately, upon reading the full article, I was reassured that Chinese space scientists indeed want to contribute their novel achievements in high technology to the international community.

Perhaps it was just the headline writer who didn’t quite understand the potentially negative implication of his words. By joining forces with the greatest minds, scientific progress becomes ever more promising.

Richard de Grijs is a columnist with China.org.cn. For more information please visit:

http://www.ccgp-fushun.com/opinion/RicharddeGrijs.htm

Opinion articles reflect the views of their authors, not necessarily those of China.org.cn.

 

Follow China.org.cn on Twitter and Facebook to join the conversation.
ChinaNews App Download
Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Enter the words you see:   
    Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲男人天堂2017| 国产乱码精品一区二区三区四川人| www夜插内射视频网站| 日本无卡码一区二区三区| 亚洲av无码乱码在线观看| 欧美精品18videosex性欧美| 免费人成在线观看视频高潮| 美女把尿口扒开让男人桶到出水| 国产四虎免费精品视频| 麻豆久久婷婷综合五月国产| 国产精品毛片va一区二区三区| 99在线精品免费视频| 奇米四色7777| 一二三四在线观看免费高清视频 | 又黄又爽的视频免费看| 雄y体育教练高h肌肉猛男| 国产成人一区二区动漫精品 | 扒美女内裤摸她的机机| 久久久久国产一区二区| 日韩中文字幕在线播放| 乱码卡一卡二卡新区在线| 欧美一区二区三区婷婷月色| 亚洲国产美女视频| 欧美日韩视频在线成人| 亚洲欧美日韩国产综合| 波多野结衣一区二区三区| 亚洲色偷偷色噜噜狠狠99| 狼友av永久网站免费观看| 免费人成在线观看网站品爱网 | 日本三级韩国三级三级a级按摩 | 国产农村妇女毛片精品久久 | 妞干网2018| 一本一本久久a久久综合精品蜜桃 一本一本久久a久久综合精品蜜桃 | www.av视频在线| 好吊妞精品视频| www四虎在线高清| 妲己高h荡肉呻吟np| 一区二区三区在线播放| 嫦娥被爆漫画羞羞漫画| yw在线观看成人免费| 好好的日视频www|