Smog has silver lining for scientists

By Harvey Morris
0 Comment(s)Print E-mail China Daily, December 20, 2016
Adjust font size:

Photo taken on the noon of Dec. 20, 2016 shows the Third Ring Road shrouded in smog in Beijing, capital of China. [By Li Huiru / China.org.cn]



It seems impossible these days to escape the Great London Smog.

Not literally, of course. It is now 64 years since the sulfurous yellow blight descended on the British capital, blocking the daylight for five days and killing at least 4,000 people before it was carried off by the wind.

Thanks to a glossy new must-see TV series, in which London's most notorious pea-souper plays a supporting role, a new generation has now been introduced to an era of fog, austerity and gloom. But more of that later.

More important, a team of Chinese, American and British scientists has finally solved the mystery of what turned the 1952 smog into a mass killer. The research, led by Renyi Zhang, a Nanjing-educated atmospheric scientist at Texas A&M University, included data from Beijing and Xi'an, two heavily polluted Chinese cities.

It has long been known that the 1952 smog coincided with a period of cold, windless weather that trapped a pall of pollutants, mostly linked to coal-burning, above the city. The new findings, published at the end of November in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, relied on recreating the smog in a lab to determine precisely how sulfur dioxide in the air was turned into deadly sulfuric acid. The scientists found that the main difference between China's pollution and the London smog is that in China much smaller airborne particles are involved.

"In China, sulfur dioxide is mainly emitted by power plants. Nitrogen dioxide is from power plants and automobiles, and ammonia comes from fertilizer use and automobiles," Zhang said in a statement. "Interestingly, while the London fog was highly acidic, contemporary Chinese haze is basically neutral." He said the new understanding of air chemistry would foster effective regulatory action in China.

"We think we have helped solve the 1952 London fog mystery, and have also given China some ideas on how to improve its air quality," Zhang wrote.

Which brings us to The Crown.

It is the latest multipart megaseries from Netflix, tempting viewers with a sometimes rosy vision of the early reign of Queen Elizabeth. Episode 4 has every Londoner, from the newly enthroned monarch to an increasingly senile Winston Churchill, then British prime minister, wrestling with the smog crisis.

Churchill had boosted the production of coal. In those postwar years it was virtually the only means of domestic heating for most of the city. In the series, his failure to tackle the long-term pollution problem is shown as threatening his government.

Personally, I remember the Great Smog rather fondly. For us kids, unaware that as many as 100,000 people were coughing their way to emergency care, or that as many as 12,000 might eventually die from the effects of the pollution, it was something of an adventure.

In those days before health-and-safety consciousness, we were allowed out to see how far we could stretch our fingers before they disappeared into the gloom. Bonfires blazed outside bus stations to guide what were then virtually the only vehicles on the streets.

In a sense, the Great Smog marked the end of the wartime era, which had carried on since 1945. Rationing was to last for another two years. Money was still in short supply, as were things to spend it on. Inner London was still scarred with bomb sites.

But a corner had been turned. The Great Smog at last prompted some action on urban pollution. By 1956, the first Clean Air Act came into force, and the use of raw coal was eventually banned.

Pea-soupers, once an essential prop in literary portrayals of London from Charles Dickens to Arthur Conan Doyle, became a distant memory.

By chance, I recently met a man who was a producer of The Crown and responsible for its smog sequences. He asked me, as a survivor, how I thought he had done.

I told him: "You could have made it thicker."

The author is a senior editorial consultant for China Daily UK.

Follow China.org.cn on Twitter and Facebook to join the conversation.
ChinaNews App Download
Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Enter the words you see:   
    Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 天天爽天天碰狠狠添| 日韩在线永久免费播放| 公车上玩两个处全文阅读| 青青草91在线| 国产日韩精品在线| 78成人精品电影在线播放| 女博士梦莹凌晨欢爱| 国产99视频精品免视看9| 国产三级精品三级在专区中文| 成人毛片18女人毛片| 久久国产乱子伦精品免费强| 樱桃视频高清免费观看在线播放 | 免费看美女让人桶尿口| 联谊对象是肉食系警官第6话| 国产商场真空露出在线观看| 欧美日韩另类综合| 国产精品亲子乱子伦xxxx裸| 91精品国产免费| 国语自产精品视频在线区| aaa一级最新毛片| 好吊色永久免费视频大全| 中国一级毛片免费看视频| 无码av中文一区二区三区桃花岛| 久久免费精彩视频| 日韩精品无码一区二区三区| 国产69精品久久久久777| 免费a级毛片无码av| 亚洲欧洲国产经精品香蕉网| 蜜桃视频一区二区| 国产喷水在线观看| 黄色a级免费网站| 少妇无码av无码专区线| 成人国产精品视频| 国产aⅴ一区二区三区| 青娱乐国产在线| 国产卡一卡二贰佰| xvdeviosbbc黑人| 日本乱子伦xxxx| 夜夜未满18勿进的爽影院| 国产成人福利免费视频| 国产三级自拍视频|