Smog has silver lining for scientists

By Harvey Morris
0 Comment(s)Print E-mail China Daily, December 20, 2016
Adjust font size:

Photo taken on the noon of Dec. 20, 2016 shows the Third Ring Road shrouded in smog in Beijing, capital of China. [By Li Huiru / China.org.cn]



It seems impossible these days to escape the Great London Smog.

Not literally, of course. It is now 64 years since the sulfurous yellow blight descended on the British capital, blocking the daylight for five days and killing at least 4,000 people before it was carried off by the wind.

Thanks to a glossy new must-see TV series, in which London's most notorious pea-souper plays a supporting role, a new generation has now been introduced to an era of fog, austerity and gloom. But more of that later.

More important, a team of Chinese, American and British scientists has finally solved the mystery of what turned the 1952 smog into a mass killer. The research, led by Renyi Zhang, a Nanjing-educated atmospheric scientist at Texas A&M University, included data from Beijing and Xi'an, two heavily polluted Chinese cities.

It has long been known that the 1952 smog coincided with a period of cold, windless weather that trapped a pall of pollutants, mostly linked to coal-burning, above the city. The new findings, published at the end of November in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, relied on recreating the smog in a lab to determine precisely how sulfur dioxide in the air was turned into deadly sulfuric acid. The scientists found that the main difference between China's pollution and the London smog is that in China much smaller airborne particles are involved.

"In China, sulfur dioxide is mainly emitted by power plants. Nitrogen dioxide is from power plants and automobiles, and ammonia comes from fertilizer use and automobiles," Zhang said in a statement. "Interestingly, while the London fog was highly acidic, contemporary Chinese haze is basically neutral." He said the new understanding of air chemistry would foster effective regulatory action in China.

"We think we have helped solve the 1952 London fog mystery, and have also given China some ideas on how to improve its air quality," Zhang wrote.

Which brings us to The Crown.

It is the latest multipart megaseries from Netflix, tempting viewers with a sometimes rosy vision of the early reign of Queen Elizabeth. Episode 4 has every Londoner, from the newly enthroned monarch to an increasingly senile Winston Churchill, then British prime minister, wrestling with the smog crisis.

Churchill had boosted the production of coal. In those postwar years it was virtually the only means of domestic heating for most of the city. In the series, his failure to tackle the long-term pollution problem is shown as threatening his government.

Personally, I remember the Great Smog rather fondly. For us kids, unaware that as many as 100,000 people were coughing their way to emergency care, or that as many as 12,000 might eventually die from the effects of the pollution, it was something of an adventure.

In those days before health-and-safety consciousness, we were allowed out to see how far we could stretch our fingers before they disappeared into the gloom. Bonfires blazed outside bus stations to guide what were then virtually the only vehicles on the streets.

In a sense, the Great Smog marked the end of the wartime era, which had carried on since 1945. Rationing was to last for another two years. Money was still in short supply, as were things to spend it on. Inner London was still scarred with bomb sites.

But a corner had been turned. The Great Smog at last prompted some action on urban pollution. By 1956, the first Clean Air Act came into force, and the use of raw coal was eventually banned.

Pea-soupers, once an essential prop in literary portrayals of London from Charles Dickens to Arthur Conan Doyle, became a distant memory.

By chance, I recently met a man who was a producer of The Crown and responsible for its smog sequences. He asked me, as a survivor, how I thought he had done.

I told him: "You could have made it thicker."

The author is a senior editorial consultant for China Daily UK.

Follow China.org.cn on Twitter and Facebook to join the conversation.
ChinaNews App Download
Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Enter the words you see:   
    Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲国产成人精品无码区在线网站 | 又爽又黄又无遮挡网站| 久久久久久久性| 男人的天堂欧美| 天天做天天爱天天干| 亚洲AV激情无码专区在线播放| 精品熟人妻一区二区三区四区不卡 | 国产在线一区二区| a毛片免费视频| 日本爽爽爽爽爽爽在线观看免| 亚洲精品自产拍在线观看| 韩国护士hd高清xxxx| 城中村找个白皙丰满妇女在线播放| 久久伊人精品一区二区三区| 欧美黑人疯狂性受xxxxx喷水| 国产主播福利一区二区| 91网站网址最新| 成人综合伊人五月婷久久| 亚洲人免费视频| 男女过程很爽的视频网站| 国产伦精品一区二区三区免费迷| 91女神疯狂娇喘3p之夜| 成人试看120秒体验区| 久久亚洲精品无码aⅴ大香| 欧美成人免费公开播放欧美成人免费一区在线播放 | 蜜桃成熟时2005| 国产精品密蕾丝视频| 一级毛片视频在线| 最新国产精品精品视频| 亚洲高清偷拍一区二区三区| 色综合久久久久综合体桃花网| 国产精品成人va| 91精品久久国产青草| 在线一区二区观看| 中文字幕不卡免费高清视频| 欧美XXXX黑人又粗又长精品| 人人添人人澡人人澡人人人人 | 少妇高潮太爽了在线视频| 久久天天躁狠狠躁夜夜不卡| 欧美日韩精品一区二区三区在线 | 色综合久久88色综合天天|