Clear law needed for online copyright cases

By Liu Wenjie
0 Comment(s)Print E-mail China Daily, December 15, 2016
Adjust font size:

Girls promote games by Shanghai Giant Network Technology Co at an industry expo held in Beijing. PROVIDED TO CHINA DAILY



Adapting popular literary works for internet programs and games has become a trend since 2013, creating a serious problem because they could constitute violation of online intellectual property rights. And with the online content industry becoming increasingly prosperous, copyright infringements have become more and more serious, especially in online games.

Many online games infringe the copyright of famous novels, cartoons, movies and television plays as well as other online games.

According to Beijing Haidian district court, copyright infringement cases involving online games increased 173.5 percent year-on-year in 2015.

In many cases, online programs and games "borrow" the names of characters, images, plots and even entire story lines from the original works, combining them into "new" plots and creating "new" works.

According to the Copyright Law, people can adapt or use existing works for their productions to create "new" works, but they should not violate the original copyright holders' legal rights. This means people can only adapt others' works after obtaining permission from those who hold the copyright for the original works.

According to the Copyright Law, the "idea-expression dichotomy" limits the scope of copyright protection by differentiating an idea from the expression or manifestation of that idea. This, in a sense, means the Copyright Law only protects expressions but not the ideas that give rise to the expressions. As such, the external expressions of a story such as characters and images are protected by the Copyright Law, so are the contents of stories.

Therefore, the story line, theme and elements of a work are all ideas, which are not protected by the Copyright Law. For instance, if one person suggests a simple story should be made into a film but doesn't provide any detailed content, what he or she proposes is regarded as idea without specific content and could be expressed in various forms. Under such circumstances, even if his or her idea is adopted, he/she can hardly be regarded as the co-creator of the work, because he/she doesn't provide its external expression or specific content beyond just the idea.

In trials of online game copyright infringement cases, Chinese courts always use the "idea-expression dichotomy" to pass verdicts. Earlier this year, Chinese kung fu novelist Wen Rui'an sued a mobile game company which used five major characters from his novels for infringing his copyright and claimed compensation. The Beijing Haidian district court said the five major characters the mobile game used is a significant part of Wen's novel and an important expression of the kung fu spirit in his novels. The court therefore ruled that the mobile game company should stop infringing Wen's copyright and pay him compensation for violating his rights.

In other words, if a person "uses" expressions from a work without the permission of the original author, he/she is infringing the author's copyright.

But there is a controversial issue in online adaptation cases, that is, whether the rules of online games come under the jurisdiction of the Copyright Law. Hearing such a case, the Shanghai first intermediate people's court said the rules governing online games consider the idea of an original work, which is not protected by the Copyright Law.

However, the court also ruled that the development and design of games involves tremendous creative works. If the rules of the games are not protected as abstract ideas, they would go against the law's intention of encouraging innovation and fair competition in the game industry. Therefore, the court also said the accused indulged in "unfair competition" by using the plaintiff's rules of the games.

This ruling used the anti-unfair competition law to go against freedom of ideas, the basic value orientation of the Copyright Law, which is self-contradictory.

The author is a professor of law at Communication University of China.

Follow China.org.cn on Twitter and Facebook to join the conversation.
ChinaNews App Download
Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Enter the words you see:   
    Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 97久久精品无码一区二区天美| 中文永久免费观看网站| 深夜福利影院在线观看| 四虎影视久久久免费| 黑人巨茎美女高潮视频| 国产精品亚洲片在线花蝴蝶 | 一二三四在线观看免费高清视频 | 伊人色综合视频一区二区三区| 美女动作一级毛片| 无码人妻一区二区三区在线| 亚洲av无码一区二区三区鸳鸯影院| 欧美黑人肉体狂欢大派对| 免费一级毛片一级毛片aa| 精品无码中文视频在线观看| 国产一区二区欧美丝袜| 韩国精品福利一区二区三区| 国产欧美一区二区三区观看 | 日本波多野结衣电影| 九月婷婷亚洲综合在线| 欧美一区二区三区久久久人妖| 亚洲日本va中文字幕久久| 波多野吉衣在线电影| 从镜子里看我怎么c你| 精品国产三级a∨在线欧美| 四虎成人免费网址在线| 色婷婷视频在线观看| 国产亚洲一区二区手机在线观看| 骚视频在线观看| 国产大片黄在线观看| 国产精品制服丝袜一区| 国产男女猛烈无遮挡免费视频网站 | 三级网站在线免费观看| 国产美女久久精品香蕉69| 97av麻豆蜜桃一区二区| 在线视频网址免费播放| a级午夜毛片免费一区二区| 天天干天天爽天天射| caoporm碰最新免费公开视频| 女人是男人的未来1分29| www.色亚洲| 女偶像私下的y荡生活|