US 2016 election is a global risk

By Dan Steinbock
0 Comment(s)Print E-mail China.org.cn, April 15, 2016
Adjust font size:

Currently, the leading Democratic presidential candidates, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, are approaching the final showdown. Concurrently, the Republican establishment - including Senate's majority leader Mitch McConnell and House Speaker Paul Ryan- is struggling to undermine the real estate mogul Donald Trump's campaign by promoting Senator Ted Cruz, Governor Kasich and less-known 'dark horses.'

After Wisconsin and New York, the leading contenders seek to consolidate their lead in the remaining delegate-rich states, including Pennsylvania in April and California and New Jersey in May.

Until November, US media will be all about presidential elections, which is financially vital to the 'bottom line' of the news organisations and media networks that financially rely increasingly on the expensive political media campaigns. As investigative journalism is largely dead, American democracy is increasingly threatened by big money, which now makes and breaks media buys, candidate campaigns and brokered conventions.

Americans' trust gap with Washington

In the past few months, Brazil's political turmoil has filled international headlines. According to Gallup, only 15% of Brazilians approve of the performance of their political leaders. What remains less understood is that about as few or fewer Americans approve of the job of the Congress. In the US, the trust in the national leadership is at record low.

Politically, Americans are fed up. According to polls, two out of every three are dissatisfied with the direction of the country, while most Democrats and Republicans believe that their party no longer cares about the middle class. As a result, most will vote on the basis of domestic issues (economy, jobs, immigration, and health care).

Intriguingly, polls also suggest that, if elections were held today and determined by votes alone, Wall Street's favorite Democrat, Hillary Clinton would beat Trump, possibly Cruz but would lose to Governor John Kasich. Even more intriguingly, the self-declared democratic socialist Bernie Sanders would beat Trump, Cruz and Kasich each and all.

However, US elections are increasingly about campaign financing and - after recent legislative changes (including the 2010 Citizens United v. FEC) that have made possible the ever-larger presence of big corporate donors - about big, very big money. A couple of years ago, some observers used to criticise the role of political action committees (PACs) in the US elections. Today, that's so passé.

At the moment, current candidates have raised an estimated $620 million, whereas the so-called super PACs, which first emerged in 2012 campaigns, have already raised more than $410 million - some 40% of the total. Technically, super PACs are independent political committees. Yet, they can support a candidate with unlimited, often anonymous donations from corporations, unions, associations or individuals.

Follow China.org.cn on Twitter and Facebook to join the conversation.
1   2   3   4   5   Next  


Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Enter the words you see:   
    Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 天天看天天爽天天摸天天添| 最新国产在线视频| 嘿咻视频免费网站| 香港全黄一级毛片在线播放 | a在线观看免费| 小泽玛利亚高清一区| 中文字幕天天躁日日躁狠狠躁免费| 日本高清免费不卡在线| 亚欧洲精品在线视频免费观看| 欧美性xxxx禁忌| 亚洲欧洲日产国码www| 波多野结衣大战黑鬼101| 免费A级毛片无码A| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 噜噜嘿在线视频免费观看| 色屁屁在线观看视频免费| 国产免费久久久久久无码| 黑人与中国女一级毛片不卡| 国产无遮挡吃胸膜奶免费看| 搡女人免费免费视频观看| 国产精品社区在线观看| 91丨九色丨蝌蚪3p| 国产高清一区二区三区视频| 99热国产免费| 天堂中文在线资源| japanese日本护士高潮| 女人张开腿让男桶喷水高潮| 三级中文有码中文字幕| 成人看免费一级毛片| 中文字幕电影在线| 无码中文字幕日韩专区| 丰满肥臀风间由美357在线| 日本精品久久久久中文字幕| 久久精品国产欧美日韩| 欧美激情在线精品video| 亚洲精品免费观看| 波多野结衣一级片| 同性女女黄h片在线播放| 色釉釉www网址| 国产三级精品三级在专区| 色婷婷丁香六月|