US 2016 election is a global risk

By Dan Steinbock
0 Comment(s)Print E-mail China.org.cn, April 15, 2016
Adjust font size:

Currently, the leading Democratic presidential candidates, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, are approaching the final showdown. Concurrently, the Republican establishment - including Senate's majority leader Mitch McConnell and House Speaker Paul Ryan- is struggling to undermine the real estate mogul Donald Trump's campaign by promoting Senator Ted Cruz, Governor Kasich and less-known 'dark horses.'

After Wisconsin and New York, the leading contenders seek to consolidate their lead in the remaining delegate-rich states, including Pennsylvania in April and California and New Jersey in May.

Until November, US media will be all about presidential elections, which is financially vital to the 'bottom line' of the news organisations and media networks that financially rely increasingly on the expensive political media campaigns. As investigative journalism is largely dead, American democracy is increasingly threatened by big money, which now makes and breaks media buys, candidate campaigns and brokered conventions.

Americans' trust gap with Washington

In the past few months, Brazil's political turmoil has filled international headlines. According to Gallup, only 15% of Brazilians approve of the performance of their political leaders. What remains less understood is that about as few or fewer Americans approve of the job of the Congress. In the US, the trust in the national leadership is at record low.

Politically, Americans are fed up. According to polls, two out of every three are dissatisfied with the direction of the country, while most Democrats and Republicans believe that their party no longer cares about the middle class. As a result, most will vote on the basis of domestic issues (economy, jobs, immigration, and health care).

Intriguingly, polls also suggest that, if elections were held today and determined by votes alone, Wall Street's favorite Democrat, Hillary Clinton would beat Trump, possibly Cruz but would lose to Governor John Kasich. Even more intriguingly, the self-declared democratic socialist Bernie Sanders would beat Trump, Cruz and Kasich each and all.

However, US elections are increasingly about campaign financing and - after recent legislative changes (including the 2010 Citizens United v. FEC) that have made possible the ever-larger presence of big corporate donors - about big, very big money. A couple of years ago, some observers used to criticise the role of political action committees (PACs) in the US elections. Today, that's so passé.

At the moment, current candidates have raised an estimated $620 million, whereas the so-called super PACs, which first emerged in 2012 campaigns, have already raised more than $410 million - some 40% of the total. Technically, super PACs are independent political committees. Yet, they can support a candidate with unlimited, often anonymous donations from corporations, unions, associations or individuals.

Follow China.org.cn on Twitter and Facebook to join the conversation.
1   2   3   4   5   Next  


Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Enter the words you see:   
    Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 伊人这里只有精品| 国产在线拍偷自揄拍无码| 人人鲁人人莫人人爱精品| 四虎永久在线日韩精品观看| 快穿之性色无边(高h)| 亚洲国产精品一区二区成人片国内| 白丝女班长被弄得娇喘不停| 国产xvideos国产在线| 黄网站免费观看| 在线观看国产一区| 一本久到久久亚洲综合| 最近韩国电影免费高清播放在线观看| 六月天丁香婷婷| 黄色永久免费网站| 大西瓜pron| 一区二区和激情视频| 日韩午夜在线观看| 亚洲xxxx18| 男人j桶进女人p无遮挡在线观看| 国产在线精彩视频| 另类欧美视频二区| 国产精品久久国产三级国不卡顿| 下面一进一出好爽视频| 欧美乱妇高清无乱码亚洲欧美| 冲田杏梨AV一区二区三区| 老师在办公室疯狂的肉我| 国产精品亚洲欧美一级久久精品| 999精品视频在线观看| 天天摸天天做天天爽| 久久亚洲sm情趣捆绑调教| 欧美日韩精彩视频| 全彩※acg海贼王同人本子| 麻豆国产在线不卡一区二区| 国产男女爽爽爽免费视频| 六月丁香色婷婷| 奇米视频7777| 丰满大白屁股ass| 日本熟妇乱人伦XXXX| 亚洲国产精品热久久| 欧美激情一区二区久久久| 亚洲精品你懂的|