US 2016 election is a global risk

By Dan Steinbock
0 Comment(s)Print E-mail China.org.cn, April 15, 2016
Adjust font size:

Currently, the leading Democratic presidential candidates, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders, are approaching the final showdown. Concurrently, the Republican establishment - including Senate's majority leader Mitch McConnell and House Speaker Paul Ryan- is struggling to undermine the real estate mogul Donald Trump's campaign by promoting Senator Ted Cruz, Governor Kasich and less-known 'dark horses.'

After Wisconsin and New York, the leading contenders seek to consolidate their lead in the remaining delegate-rich states, including Pennsylvania in April and California and New Jersey in May.

Until November, US media will be all about presidential elections, which is financially vital to the 'bottom line' of the news organisations and media networks that financially rely increasingly on the expensive political media campaigns. As investigative journalism is largely dead, American democracy is increasingly threatened by big money, which now makes and breaks media buys, candidate campaigns and brokered conventions.

Americans' trust gap with Washington

In the past few months, Brazil's political turmoil has filled international headlines. According to Gallup, only 15% of Brazilians approve of the performance of their political leaders. What remains less understood is that about as few or fewer Americans approve of the job of the Congress. In the US, the trust in the national leadership is at record low.

Politically, Americans are fed up. According to polls, two out of every three are dissatisfied with the direction of the country, while most Democrats and Republicans believe that their party no longer cares about the middle class. As a result, most will vote on the basis of domestic issues (economy, jobs, immigration, and health care).

Intriguingly, polls also suggest that, if elections were held today and determined by votes alone, Wall Street's favorite Democrat, Hillary Clinton would beat Trump, possibly Cruz but would lose to Governor John Kasich. Even more intriguingly, the self-declared democratic socialist Bernie Sanders would beat Trump, Cruz and Kasich each and all.

However, US elections are increasingly about campaign financing and - after recent legislative changes (including the 2010 Citizens United v. FEC) that have made possible the ever-larger presence of big corporate donors - about big, very big money. A couple of years ago, some observers used to criticise the role of political action committees (PACs) in the US elections. Today, that's so passé.

At the moment, current candidates have raised an estimated $620 million, whereas the so-called super PACs, which first emerged in 2012 campaigns, have already raised more than $410 million - some 40% of the total. Technically, super PACs are independent political committees. Yet, they can support a candidate with unlimited, often anonymous donations from corporations, unions, associations or individuals.

Follow China.org.cn on Twitter and Facebook to join the conversation.
1   2   3   4   5   Next  


Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Enter the words you see:   
    Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产精品免费播放| 成人福利网址永久在线观看| 亚洲欧美日韩综合俺去了| 精品小视频在线| 国产乱XXXXX97国语对白| 国产香蕉一区二区在线网站| 国产网红主播无码精品| 免费人成动漫在线播放r18| 色网站在线免费观看| 国内精品伊人久久久久影院对白| 上课公然调教h| 无码精品国产一区二区免费| 亚洲精品无码久久久久AV麻豆| 精品日韩在线视频| 国产主播一区二区| 麻豆一区二区三区蜜桃免费| 国产特级毛片aaaaaa高潮流水| 2021国产麻豆剧果冻传媒入口| 天堂√在线中文最新版8| 久久亚洲AV无码精品色午夜麻| 最近中文字幕在线视频| 亚洲情a成黄在线观看| 毛片免费在线视频| 四虎影视精品永久免费| 隔壁女邻居在线观看| 国产性生活大片| 日韩色图在线观看| 好男人社区视频| 一级毛片试看三分钟| 成年人一级毛片| 中文字幕日韩一区二区三区不| 日本免费人成视频播放| 久久夜色精品国产亚洲| 日韩亚洲欧洲在线rrrr片| 久久精品国产色蜜蜜麻豆| 春雨直播免费直播视频在线观看下载 | 手机在线看片你懂的| 久久久久久综合网天天| 日本三级片网站| 久久久99精品免费观看| 无遮挡无删动漫肉在线观看|