China's 'Belt and Road' initiative and the EU's 'Juncker Plan'

By John Ross
0 Comment(s)Print E-mail China.org.cn, January 16, 2016
Adjust font size:

The overlap of the Juncker Plan's ideas with China's Belt and Road initiative is evident. China's new distinctive idea in the initiative, as with parallel ones such as the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB), is explicitly tying together trade and infrastructure investment initiatives.

Previous post-World War II trade initiatives up to the creation of the World Trade Organisation, all led by the U.S., focused on tariff and legal changes. Adding infrastructure investment and financing necessary to create it as a central element was China's innovation - an example of "thought leadership."

The first success illustrating the power of China's new form of economic initiative was the U.K.'s decision, followed by other major European countries including Germany, to join the AIIB despite U.S. objections. The convergence of the Juncker Plan with the Belt and Road initiative is an example of the same process involving an even greater number of European countries.

At first sight it might appear strange that the idea of closely linking trade and infrastructure investment was not put forward earlier by Western leaders. The beneficial economic effect of both trade and investment, and the correlation of the two, is well established in economics. The classic "Western" study of the advantages of "openness" in trade, by Sachs and Warner, found: "Open economies had significantly higher investment-to-GDP ratios, and that [an open economy] raised the investment ratio by an average of 5.4 percentage points." Therefore why was it China that first explicitly linked these in a coherent new international policy?

Practically China learnt from the advantages of its domestic economic structure compared to the West. The Western private sector economies are dominated by a mantra "private is good, state is bad." Therefore proposals for inevitably state led infrastructure investment by Summers, Wolf etc., encountered fierce ideological opposition - as well as few strong structures existing to implement the policy.

In China in contrast, as restated by the 3rd plenum of the 18th CPC Central Committee: "We must unswervingly… give full play to the leading role of the state-owned sector." In China's economy both a private and state sector exist and the state can therefore play a key role in initiatives such as infrastructure investment.

Follow China.org.cn on Twitter and Facebook to join the conversation.
   Previous   1   2   3   Next  


Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Enter the words you see:   
    Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 精品无码中文视频在线观看| 2021久久精品国产99国产精品| 日本高清视频在线www色| 亚洲天堂2016| 烈血黄昏中视频| 性欧美videos喷水| 久久国产精品61947| 欧美videosdesexo肥婆| 亚洲第一福利网站| 调教双乳玉势揉捏h捆绑小说| 国产福利片在线| 69xx免费观看视频| 在线日韩理论午夜中文电影| www视频免费看| 成人免费淫片免费观看| 中文字幕精品视频| 日本漫画免费大全飞翼全彩| 亚洲AV无码国产精品麻豆天美| 欧美性猛交xxxx乱大交高清| 亚洲精品tv久久久久久久久| 玖玖在线资源站| 免费观看无遮挡www的视频| 翁熄性放纵交换| 国产精品www| 44luba爱你啪| 国产自产在线视频一区| 99re热视频| 在线视频欧美日韩| a级毛片在线免费看| 女人洗澡一级毛片一级毛片| 一区二区三区视频| 少妇熟女久久综合网色欲| 中文亚洲欧美日韩无线码| 手机在线看片国产日韩生活片| 久久中文骚妇内射| 日本人69视频jzzij| 久久国产综合精品欧美| 日韩精品无码一区二区三区| 亚洲AV无码国产一区二区三区 | 无码国产成人午夜电影在线观看| 久久人妻夜夜做天天爽|