Shall we all be Charlie: a US-Europe comparison

By Shen Dingli
0 Comment(s)Print E-mail China.org.cn, February 4, 2015
Adjust font size:

This said, even "disrespect" of one's own values should not be responded with radical means including violence. That is why globally France has been sympathized with. Nevertheless, such comfort has to be properly received as it contains the message of tolerance. To the surprise of many, the Charlie Hebdo reprinted that issue which evoked the terrorist attack, and published a new issue that portraits the Prophet again. Legally this has violated no restriction, but culturally the French cartoon magazine, with many supporters behind it, contrasts a lot with the political code that many Americans have followed.

The aforementioned difference between American and European response to the Charlie Hebdo illustrates the boundary of freedom – the liberty of media may not go without a limit. At political level, the fundamental value of democracy lies in the essential assumption of mutual respect, as any minority or ethnic group has a right to express. But in terms of social and economic impact, any such expression has to be weighed against cost. An unchecked freedom could likely lead to social unrest, so one has to balance rights and obligation.

Such common sense actually applies widely. Many countries have adopted media censorship on certain substances such as anti-society, extremism, or pornography. But on culturally sensitive area, it is more up to an individual to allow self-censorship and the government needs to encourage proper balance of tolerance and freedom. A mature society has to be able to get the best of them, rather than to be harmed by unlimited liberty and unbalanced tolerance.

Thus, to be a responsible Charlie might be more important than to be a mere Charlie, which stresses an abstract concept of freedom. Appreciating the right of liberty, while being sensible of other's culture, brings more benefit but less harm than otherwise. The truth is neither "We are all Charlie", nor "We are not Charlie", but "We are not all Charlie".

The author is a columnist with China.org.cn. For more information please visit:http://www.ccgp-fushun.com/opinion/shendingli.htm

This article was first published at Chinausfocus.com To see the original version please visit http://www.chinausfocus.com/peace-security/shall-we-all-be-charlie-a-u-s-europe-comparison/

Opinion articles reflect the views of their authors, not necessarily those of China.org.cn.

 

Follow China.org.cn on Twitter and Facebook to join the conversation.
   Previous   1   2   3  


Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Enter the words you see:   
    Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲欧美精品在线| 日本高清免费看| 嗯嗯啊在线观看网址| 黑人3p波多野结衣在线观看| 国产精品第44页| a级aaaaaaaa毛片| 成人午夜视频精品一区| 久久亚洲精品视频| 最新欧洲大片免费在线| 亚洲成av人片不卡无码| 波多野たの结衣老人绝伦 | 国产一区二区精品久久岳| 国产91免费在线观看| 国产第一导航深夜福利| 7777久久亚洲中文字幕| 国模杨依大胆张腿视频流露| porn在线精品视频| 孩交精品xxxx视频视频| 中国体育生gary飞机| 手机看片久久国产免费| 久久久久免费精品国产| 日韩在线一区二区三区免费视频| 亚洲一区二区三区精品视频| 欧美成人全部费免网站| 亚洲欧洲精品成人久久曰| 毛片在线看免费| 亚洲第一福利网| 波多野结衣一二三区| 人人色在线视频播放| 男人边吃奶边爱边做视频刺激 | 国产砖码砖专区| 两个人看的视频www在线高清| 国产精品美女久久久久AV福利| 91制片厂果冻传媒白晶晶| 国内偷窥一区二区三区视频| 99视频在线免费看| 夜夜夜精品视频免费| 99久热只有精品视频免费看 | 国产精品线在线精品| 69xxxx国产在线观看| 国产经典三级在线|