Shall we all be Charlie: a US-Europe comparison

By Shen Dingli
0 Comment(s)Print E-mail China.org.cn, February 4, 2015
Adjust font size:

This said, even "disrespect" of one's own values should not be responded with radical means including violence. That is why globally France has been sympathized with. Nevertheless, such comfort has to be properly received as it contains the message of tolerance. To the surprise of many, the Charlie Hebdo reprinted that issue which evoked the terrorist attack, and published a new issue that portraits the Prophet again. Legally this has violated no restriction, but culturally the French cartoon magazine, with many supporters behind it, contrasts a lot with the political code that many Americans have followed.

The aforementioned difference between American and European response to the Charlie Hebdo illustrates the boundary of freedom – the liberty of media may not go without a limit. At political level, the fundamental value of democracy lies in the essential assumption of mutual respect, as any minority or ethnic group has a right to express. But in terms of social and economic impact, any such expression has to be weighed against cost. An unchecked freedom could likely lead to social unrest, so one has to balance rights and obligation.

Such common sense actually applies widely. Many countries have adopted media censorship on certain substances such as anti-society, extremism, or pornography. But on culturally sensitive area, it is more up to an individual to allow self-censorship and the government needs to encourage proper balance of tolerance and freedom. A mature society has to be able to get the best of them, rather than to be harmed by unlimited liberty and unbalanced tolerance.

Thus, to be a responsible Charlie might be more important than to be a mere Charlie, which stresses an abstract concept of freedom. Appreciating the right of liberty, while being sensible of other's culture, brings more benefit but less harm than otherwise. The truth is neither "We are all Charlie", nor "We are not Charlie", but "We are not all Charlie".

The author is a columnist with China.org.cn. For more information please visit:http://www.ccgp-fushun.com/opinion/shendingli.htm

This article was first published at Chinausfocus.com To see the original version please visit http://www.chinausfocus.com/peace-security/shall-we-all-be-charlie-a-u-s-europe-comparison/

Opinion articles reflect the views of their authors, not necessarily those of China.org.cn.

 

Follow China.org.cn on Twitter and Facebook to join the conversation.
   Previous   1   2   3  


Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Enter the words you see:   
    Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 韩国护士hd高清xxxx| av72发布页| 暖暖在线视频日本| 亚洲妇熟xxxx妇色黄| 熟女性饥渴一区二区三区| 北条麻妃中文字幕免观在线| 色播亚洲视频在线观看| 国产成人精品亚洲精品| 全免费毛片在线播放| 国产老妇伦国产熟女老妇高清| japan69xxxxtube| 性色AV无码一区二区三区人妻| 久久久www成人免费精品| 日韩人妻无码中文字幕视频| 亚洲av无码片vr一区二区三区| 欧美在线看片a免费观看| 亚洲欧美一区二区三区在线| 波多野结衣电影免费在线观看| 侵犯小太正bl浴室子开张了| 精品伊人久久香线蕉| 午夜成人理论福利片| 美女毛片一区二区三区四区| 国产一区二区精品久久| 边吃奶边摸下面| 国产免费av片在线观看| 高清videosgratis欧洲69| 国产成人在线网址| 成人草莓视频在线观看| 国产成人精品免费直播| 黑白禁区高清免费观看全集电视剧| 国产福利一区二区三区在线视频 | 欧美A级毛欧美1级a大片免费播放| 亚洲欧美久久精品| 欧美精品一二三| 亚洲欧美另类国产| 欧美激情视频一区二区三区免费| 亚洲码一区二区三区| 欧美综合人人做人人爱| 亚洲日韩在线视频| 欧美性色欧美a在线播放| 亚洲国产综合无码一区|