Shall we all be Charlie: a US-Europe comparison

By Shen Dingli
0 Comment(s)Print E-mail China.org.cn, February 4, 2015
Adjust font size:

This said, even "disrespect" of one's own values should not be responded with radical means including violence. That is why globally France has been sympathized with. Nevertheless, such comfort has to be properly received as it contains the message of tolerance. To the surprise of many, the Charlie Hebdo reprinted that issue which evoked the terrorist attack, and published a new issue that portraits the Prophet again. Legally this has violated no restriction, but culturally the French cartoon magazine, with many supporters behind it, contrasts a lot with the political code that many Americans have followed.

The aforementioned difference between American and European response to the Charlie Hebdo illustrates the boundary of freedom – the liberty of media may not go without a limit. At political level, the fundamental value of democracy lies in the essential assumption of mutual respect, as any minority or ethnic group has a right to express. But in terms of social and economic impact, any such expression has to be weighed against cost. An unchecked freedom could likely lead to social unrest, so one has to balance rights and obligation.

Such common sense actually applies widely. Many countries have adopted media censorship on certain substances such as anti-society, extremism, or pornography. But on culturally sensitive area, it is more up to an individual to allow self-censorship and the government needs to encourage proper balance of tolerance and freedom. A mature society has to be able to get the best of them, rather than to be harmed by unlimited liberty and unbalanced tolerance.

Thus, to be a responsible Charlie might be more important than to be a mere Charlie, which stresses an abstract concept of freedom. Appreciating the right of liberty, while being sensible of other's culture, brings more benefit but less harm than otherwise. The truth is neither "We are all Charlie", nor "We are not Charlie", but "We are not all Charlie".

The author is a columnist with China.org.cn. For more information please visit:http://www.ccgp-fushun.com/opinion/shendingli.htm

This article was first published at Chinausfocus.com To see the original version please visit http://www.chinausfocus.com/peace-security/shall-we-all-be-charlie-a-u-s-europe-comparison/

Opinion articles reflect the views of their authors, not necessarily those of China.org.cn.

 

Follow China.org.cn on Twitter and Facebook to join the conversation.
   Previous   1   2   3  


Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Enter the words you see:   
    Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 公和我做得好爽在线观看| 国产成人精品免费视频大全办公室| 中国女人内谢69xxx| 日韩a毛片免费观看| 国产熟女AA级毛片| 97碰在线视频| 奇米影视7777狠狠狠狠色| 亚洲Av高清一区二区三区| 精品人妻少妇嫩草AV无码专区 | 久久久久亚洲AV无码麻豆| 最好看最新日本中文字幕| 亚洲午夜爱爱香蕉片| 精品人妻少妇一区二区三区| 国产丫丫视频私人影院| 成人午夜免费福利视频| 波多野结衣伦理片bd高清在线| 国产成人免费ā片在线观看| h片在线免费观看| 日韩a在线观看| 乱中年女人伦av三区| 欧美另类老少配hd| 亚洲成av人片在线观看无| 永久免费毛片在线播放| 亚洲色欲或者高潮影院| 色欲综合久久中文字幕网| 国产精品亚洲精品青青青| 97久久精品人妻人人搡人人玩 | 五福影院最新地址| 波多野结衣按摩| 你懂得视频在线观看| 精品97国产免费人成视频| 卡一卡二卡三在线入口免费| 992tv在线| 国产特级毛片AAAAAA高潮流水| 最新亚洲精品国自产在线观看| 国产精品高清一区二区人妖| 丁香六月综合网| 日韩人妻无码一区二区三区久久| 亚洲男人的天堂网站| 精品精品国产高清a毛片| 国产成人免费网站|