Environmental impact assessment must be made public

By Mao Da
0 Comment(s)Print E-mail China Daily, December 4, 2014
Adjust font size:

An environmental impact assessment should serve as legal evidence of the health of a project. But since a negative environmental assessment, flashed in the media, could deal a blow to the reputation and credibility of a project, the Shenzhen authorities are reluctant to make it public.

The lack of public participation in environmental impact assessments is a vital flaw in cases like the Xiaping landfill. In a public project, public supervision and technical assessment are normally separated; the former is conducted by the construction department which is not in charge of environmental impact assessment.

Soliciting public opinions often depends on simply publishing (or posting online) questionnaires, which can hardly guarantee real public participation. In comparison, a public hearing would do a better job of clearing the distrust between the public and environmental department officials.

But neither incineration nor landfills can fundamentally improve the over-burdened garbage disposal systems of many Chinese cities, especially the mega ones such as Beijing, which generates more than 18,000 tons of household garbage a day.

Should the Xiaping landfill's operation be suspended, the Shenzhen environment bureau would have to relocate it in accordance with public demand and professional advice. More importantly, reducing unnecessary daily waste, which requires an efficient garbage classification and utilization system, remains the key to efficient waste disposal.

For instance, local governments should encourage individual people, as major waste generators, to sort their garbage at source into kitchen waste, and recyclable and non-recyclable wastes. The local governments also have to optimize the use of transportation and disposal methods, and discourage the use and production of use-and-throw products like tableware and excessive packaging.

When it comes to supervision, all environmental impact assessments must be made public, because that is what the law demands. Besides, a legal accountability mechanism should be put in place to deal with cases in which earlier assessments have failed to be incisive and thus made matters worse. And since every step in the waste disposal system is interconnected, governments should seek public opinion and take remedial measures instead of playing hide-and-seek with the people.

The author is a researcher at Nature University, an environmental protection NGO in Beijing. The article is an excerpt from his interview with China Daily's reporter Cui Shoufeng.

 

Follow China.org.cn on Twitter and Facebook to join the conversation.
   Previous   1   2  


Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Enter the words you see:   
    Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 免费观看激色视频网站(性色)| 国产极品粉嫩交性大片| 中文www新版资源在线| 最近最新的免费中文字幕| 国产麻豆剧果冻传媒免精品费网站 | 拍拍拍无挡免费视频网站| 伊人久久大香线蕉综合影院首页| 老师开嫩苞在线观看 | 中文字幕免费观看视频| 日韩中文字幕在线| 亚洲av永久无码精品三区在线4 | 国产成年女人特黄特色毛片免| 3344永久在线观看视频免费首页| 在线视频一区二区日韩国产| 偷窥自拍10p| porn在线精品视频| 国内精品伊人久久久久777| sss在线观看免费高清| 成人深夜福利在线播放不卡| 久久久久久久999| 日本高清在线免费| 久久精品桃花综合| 最近中文字幕高清免费大全8| 亚洲午夜精品久久久久久浪潮| 欧美激情久久久久久久久| 亚洲精品视频免费看| 男人影院天堂网址| 免费人成视频在线观看网站| 精品久久久久久无码中文字幕| 四虎影视免费永久在线观看| youjizz欧美| 国产精品福利自产拍在线观看| 97人妻人人做人碰人人爽| 夜先锋av资源网站| H无码精品3D动漫在线观看| 天天躁日日躁狠狠躁| 一个人看的免费观看日本视频www 一个人看的免费视频www在线高清动漫 | 综合91在线精品| 国产福利一区二区三区在线观看 | loveme枫と铃樱花动漫| 娃娃脸1977年英国|