Environmental impact assessment must be made public

By Mao Da
0 Comment(s)Print E-mail China Daily, December 4, 2014
Adjust font size:

An environmental impact assessment should serve as legal evidence of the health of a project. But since a negative environmental assessment, flashed in the media, could deal a blow to the reputation and credibility of a project, the Shenzhen authorities are reluctant to make it public.

The lack of public participation in environmental impact assessments is a vital flaw in cases like the Xiaping landfill. In a public project, public supervision and technical assessment are normally separated; the former is conducted by the construction department which is not in charge of environmental impact assessment.

Soliciting public opinions often depends on simply publishing (or posting online) questionnaires, which can hardly guarantee real public participation. In comparison, a public hearing would do a better job of clearing the distrust between the public and environmental department officials.

But neither incineration nor landfills can fundamentally improve the over-burdened garbage disposal systems of many Chinese cities, especially the mega ones such as Beijing, which generates more than 18,000 tons of household garbage a day.

Should the Xiaping landfill's operation be suspended, the Shenzhen environment bureau would have to relocate it in accordance with public demand and professional advice. More importantly, reducing unnecessary daily waste, which requires an efficient garbage classification and utilization system, remains the key to efficient waste disposal.

For instance, local governments should encourage individual people, as major waste generators, to sort their garbage at source into kitchen waste, and recyclable and non-recyclable wastes. The local governments also have to optimize the use of transportation and disposal methods, and discourage the use and production of use-and-throw products like tableware and excessive packaging.

When it comes to supervision, all environmental impact assessments must be made public, because that is what the law demands. Besides, a legal accountability mechanism should be put in place to deal with cases in which earlier assessments have failed to be incisive and thus made matters worse. And since every step in the waste disposal system is interconnected, governments should seek public opinion and take remedial measures instead of playing hide-and-seek with the people.

The author is a researcher at Nature University, an environmental protection NGO in Beijing. The article is an excerpt from his interview with China Daily's reporter Cui Shoufeng.

 

Follow China.org.cn on Twitter and Facebook to join the conversation.
   Previous   1   2  


Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Enter the words you see:   
    Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 最好看的2018中文字幕国语免费 | 超清首页国产亚洲丝袜| 男女下面无遮挡一进一出| 国产精品亚洲综合网站| 中文字幕在线免费视频| 日韩国产在线观看| 亚洲色欲久久久综合网东京热| 高清不卡毛片免费观看| 大学生一级特黄的免费大片视频| 乱人伦中文字幕电影| 男人j桶女人p免费视频| 国产在线精品一区二区| 97色在线观看| 奇米第四色首页| 一级特黄aaa大片在| 最近中文字幕高清中文字幕无 | 狼狼综合久久久久综合网| 国产亚洲美女精品久久久久 | 久久综合九色综合欧美就去吻| 精品影片在线观看的网站| 国产欧美视频一区二区三区| 69国产精品视频免费| 岛国在线免费观看| 中文天堂最新版www在线观看 | 亚洲国产日产无码精品| 欧美精品无需播放器在线观看| 国产一二三视频| 亚洲娇小性色xxxx| 国产精品日韩专区| 91噜噜噜在线观看| 性感美女视频在线观看免费精品| 丰满少妇高潮惨叫久久久| 欧美40老熟妇| 亚洲午夜精品久久久久久浪潮| 欧美成人免费观看的| 免费国产在线视频| 花蝴蝶免费版高清版| 国产精品久久久久久久| ww亚洲ww在线观看国产| 国产精品中文字幕在线观看| 奇米影视777色|