Environmental impact assessment must be made public

By Mao Da
0 Comment(s)Print E-mail China Daily, December 4, 2014
Adjust font size:

An environmental impact assessment should serve as legal evidence of the health of a project. But since a negative environmental assessment, flashed in the media, could deal a blow to the reputation and credibility of a project, the Shenzhen authorities are reluctant to make it public.

The lack of public participation in environmental impact assessments is a vital flaw in cases like the Xiaping landfill. In a public project, public supervision and technical assessment are normally separated; the former is conducted by the construction department which is not in charge of environmental impact assessment.

Soliciting public opinions often depends on simply publishing (or posting online) questionnaires, which can hardly guarantee real public participation. In comparison, a public hearing would do a better job of clearing the distrust between the public and environmental department officials.

But neither incineration nor landfills can fundamentally improve the over-burdened garbage disposal systems of many Chinese cities, especially the mega ones such as Beijing, which generates more than 18,000 tons of household garbage a day.

Should the Xiaping landfill's operation be suspended, the Shenzhen environment bureau would have to relocate it in accordance with public demand and professional advice. More importantly, reducing unnecessary daily waste, which requires an efficient garbage classification and utilization system, remains the key to efficient waste disposal.

For instance, local governments should encourage individual people, as major waste generators, to sort their garbage at source into kitchen waste, and recyclable and non-recyclable wastes. The local governments also have to optimize the use of transportation and disposal methods, and discourage the use and production of use-and-throw products like tableware and excessive packaging.

When it comes to supervision, all environmental impact assessments must be made public, because that is what the law demands. Besides, a legal accountability mechanism should be put in place to deal with cases in which earlier assessments have failed to be incisive and thus made matters worse. And since every step in the waste disposal system is interconnected, governments should seek public opinion and take remedial measures instead of playing hide-and-seek with the people.

The author is a researcher at Nature University, an environmental protection NGO in Beijing. The article is an excerpt from his interview with China Daily's reporter Cui Shoufeng.

 

Follow China.org.cn on Twitter and Facebook to join the conversation.
   Previous   1   2  


Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Enter the words you see:   
    Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 污视频免费看软件| 亚洲精品在线播放视频| 亚洲色偷偷综合亚洲av78| 亚洲AV无码成人专区| 一级毛片60分钟在线播放久草高清在线 | 故意打开双腿让翁公看| 国自产拍亚洲免费视频| 国产产无码乱码精品久久鸭| 亚洲精品美女在线观看播放| 久久午夜无码鲁丝片午夜精品| chinese乱子伦xxxx视频播放| 韩日美无码精品无码| 波多野结衣bd| 成全视频在线观看在线播放高清| 国产精品模特hd在线| 午夜视频在线观看免费完整版| 亚洲专区一路线二| а√天堂中文最新版地址| 高潮毛片无遮挡高清免费视频| 正在播放黑人巨大视频| 手机看片你懂的| 国产日韩一区二区三区在线观看| 人妻丰满熟妇AV无码区免| 久久久久亚洲av成人无码| 69视频在线观看免费| 精品国产一区二区三区久久影院| 欧产日产国产精品| 国内精品久久久久久久久蜜桃| 午夜国产在线视频| 久久天天躁狠狠躁夜夜躁2014| 67194熟妇在线观看线路1| 精品久久久久久中文字幕一区| 日本全黄三级在线观看| 国产精品99久久久| 亚洲欧美综合一区| www.亚洲色图| 美女被爆羞羞网站在免费观看| 日韩毛片在线视频| 国产精品中文字幕在线观看| 你懂的中文字幕| 三极片在线观看|