Beijing, Washington locked in FTA race

By Jayant Menon
0 Comment(s)Print E-mail China Daily, November 6, 2014
Adjust font size:

There appears to be a race between the United States and China to dominate the rules-setting game for trade by being the first to be able to announce plans of realizing a Free Trade Agreement for the Asia-Pacific. If the Trans-Pacific Partnership can be concluded, in one form or the other, so an announcement can be made at the APEC meeting in Beijing at the end of the week it would steal the thunder from China. But if such an announcement is not forthcoming, China will likely announce a "Beijing Road Map" for an FTA of the Pacific-rim, building on APEC rather than the TPP. Billions of dollars in trade are at stake.

It will be difficult for leaders from the TPP countries to ignore a declaration endorsing a feasibility study for the FTAAP if they cannot offer an alternative. Reports on whether the US has been able to dissuade China from floating the proposal have been mixed. They have succeeded in leaving the door slightly ajar for the TPP to play a future role by blocking reference to a deadline for completion of 2025. Although deadlines can be missed, as the TPP itself demonstrates, setting one implies it is more than just a vision but a plan bounded by a timeframe. The fear is that pursuing the FTAAP could derail the TPP.

There is widespread confusion about why the TPP is taking so long, and what it may look like when finally concluded.

A useful starting point in explaining the delay is to look at the 12 countries involved, which are a highly diverse group by any measure. They are widely dispersed geographically, with members from four of the world's seven continents, and they are just as economically diverse. Australia's per capita income is 40 times that of Vietnam. The US economy is 1,000 times the size of Brunei's. Finding common ground amid such diversity can't be easy.

Of course, the TPP delays pale in comparison to another struggling proposed trade pact - the World Trade Organization's Doha Round. But although there are fewer countries in the TPP compared to the WTO, diversity is not a simple function of the number of countries involved. Where a group includes countries as varied as Vietnam, Peru and the US, there is not only a lack of commonality in negotiating positions; negotiators may not even subscribe to broadly similar principles. APEC has even more diversity since it has an additional nine members. But then it is not trying to conclude any agreement at present.

Moreover, there is the sense of the TPP being an unfair bargain, as the agenda appears skewed firmly in favor of one party. The carrot being dangled by the US is improved access to its huge market. But as half the TPP members already have an FTA in place with the US and the rest are trying to conclude one, the incremental benefit is likely small.

Follow China.org.cn on Twitter and Facebook to join the conversation.
1   2   Next  


Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Enter the words you see:   
    Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 最近最新2019中文字幕高清| 高中生的放荡日记h| 日本视频免费高清一本18| 你把腰抬一下不然没法发动| 激情五月激情综合网| 妖精的尾巴ova| 亚洲AV无码久久| 玩山村女娃的小屁股| 国产又大又粗又长免费视频| 97久久综合精品久久久综合| 无套内射视频囯产| 亚洲伊人久久大香线蕉综合图片| 精品久久洲久久久久护士| 国产无遮挡裸体免费视频| 9久热这里只有精品免费| 无码国产色欲XXXXX视频| 国产精品三级av及在线观看| 一本到卡二卡三卡免费高| 日韩欧美理论片| 亚洲色成人WWW永久在线观看| 色综合久久98天天综合| 国产精品成人无码视频| 一区二区三区在线|欧| 日韩一区二区三区免费体验| 亚洲欧洲无码一区二区三区| 精品人妻中文字幕有码在线| 国产在线国偷精品免费看| 91麻豆精品国产自产在线| 成人毛片在线观看| 久久精品老司机| 欧美日韩视频免费播放| 免费无毒A网站在线观看| 视频一区二区在线观看| 国产精品内射久久久久欢欢| 久久亚洲伊人中字综合精品| 欧美日本视频在线观看| 免费人成视网站在线观看不卡| 西西大胆午夜人体视频| 国产精品多p对白交换绿帽| heyzo朝桐光在线播放| 无人在线观看视频高清视频8|