For better green governance

By Patrick Schroeder and Li Wanxin
0 Comment(s)Print E-mail China Daily, December 12, 2013
Adjust font size:

So it is in the interest of the government and all stakeholders to inform and involve the public in a systematic way at an early stage of the decision-making process and prevent situations where the public has no other option but to take to the streets with the potential for violent clashes between protesters and law enforcement officers.

The issue has been in focus at the current European Union-China Environmental Governance Program, a multimillion-euro cooperation program between the European Commission and the Chinese Ministry of Environmental Protection. The overall lessons learned from a European context show that public participation is an important element for the successful environmental planning process.

Going beyond just simple communication and provision of information, international experiences show that the most successful and effective examples of public participation involve the public as a partner in the decision-making process, leading to further empowerment of the public in the long term. Techniques available for effective public participation in environmental planning have evolved over the past two to three decades and have been successfully applied in a number of EU member states. A multitude of participation techniques have emerged, but they are yet to be used in China.

For instance, participatory techniques such as "Citizens' Juries" can be used to broker a conflict or to provide a transparent and non-aligned viewpoint on various issues, including environmental planning. "Future Search" is a technique meant to shed light on a common problem to generate visions about the possible "future" and to jointly discuss how these visions can be realized.

Similarly, but by taking a long-term approach, the method of "Scenario Analysis" anticipates future developments of society and evaluates strategies for responding to these developments. The "Consensus Conference" developed in Denmark has been used to assess emerging technologies (such as nuclear energy or genetic modification) and their impacts. It is, therefore, relevant for environmental planning and assessment.

And "Deliberative Opinion Polling" is especially suitable for situations where the public may have little knowledge or information about a certain issue.

Nevertheless, decision-makers in many countries, including Europe and China, still hold the outdated opinion that public participation is either an obstacle to implementation of large projects or simply a matter of effective communication and information dissemination. This attitude is based on the belief that "authorities" already know what the best solution is and the public needs only to be convinced. In this case, it is not a matter of participation but one of persuasion.

Regardless of the participation method applied, a number of generally accepted principles for effective participation include an early involvement of stakeholders, integration of all stakeholders, setting process and goals, and monitoring of expectations and stakeholder satisfaction. It is particularly important that public participation starts early in the process, when decisions have not yet been made. Only then, delays in the implementation and even cancellation of projects can be avoided. Very importantly, through the constructive input of the public, "blind spots" in project planning overlooked by experts can be identified and addressed in time.

The EU-China Environmental Governance Program identified specific steps that could be taken to meet the needs of the plenum document and to close the gap with international standards and practices of public participation. They include adopting cutting-edge methods and instruments for public participation and using them in the Chinese context.

Capacity building is also necessary for local planning in China and for environmental authorities to improve their understanding of the conditions and procedures of practicing the chosen participation methods. Training of expert facilitators, who understand the importance of maintaining neutrality in public involvement sessions and are skilled in implementing the participatory methods and techniques, is another important element.

Finally, participatory stakeholder workshops should be held at the national and provincial levels on emerging issues related to controversial technologies to address long-term environmental challenges, such as nuclear waste management, shale gas fracking or carbon capture and storage.

Patrick Schroeder works for EU SWITCH-Asia Network Facility, and Li Wanxin is a professor at the City University of Hong Kong and Tsinghua University.

   Previous   1   2  


Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Enter the words you see:   
    Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲三级在线看| 男女午夜爽爽大片免费| 最近中文字幕2019国语3| 国产亚洲精品无码成人| 乱人伦xxxx国语对白| 精品福利三区3d卡通动漫| 国产精品入口麻豆免费| 中文亚洲成a人片在线观看| 欧美姓爱第一页| 动漫美女被到爽流触手| 人人玩人人添人人澡mp4| 小妇人电影中文在线观看| 亚洲av午夜成人片精品网站| 精品久久人人妻人人做精品| 国产熟女乱子视频正在播放| yy6080理论影院旧里番| 日韩激情电影在线观看| 亚洲网站免费观看| 色综合久久天天综合绕观看| 国产精品网址在线观看你懂的| 中文字幕乱码人妻综合二区三区 | 国产在线拍偷自揄拍无码| 99精品久久久久久久婷婷| 日日碰狠狠添天天爽超碰97| 亚洲情a成黄在线观看| 美女胸又大又黄又www的网站| 国产男女猛烈无遮挡免费视频 | 国产好深好硬好爽我还要视频| 9丨精品国产高清自在线看 | 在线看三级aaa| 中文字幕在线播| 欧美亚洲国产精品久久高清| 免费看男女下面日出水视频| 香蕉视频污在线观看| 国产高清乱理伦片中文电影| 么公又大又硬又粗又爽视频| 欧美亚洲国产第一页草草| 亚洲国产品综合人成综合网站| 男人的好在线观看免费视频| 免费观看四虎精品国产永久| 邻居的又大又硬又粗好爽|