Science has bigger say in GM food

By Shenggen Fan
0 Comment(s)Print E-mail China Daily, October 29, 2013
Adjust font size:

Whether genetically modified foods can help eradicate food insecurity and poverty has been the subject of contentious and polarizing debate.

Guinea pigs? [By Jiao Haiyang/China.org.cn]



The backdrop to this debate is a global agricultural system that is facing increasing challenges from rising climatic variability, population growth, urbanization, and natural resource depletion. According to the Food and Agriculture Organization, food production needs to increase by 60 percent by 2050 in order to feed 9 billion plus people. Scientists and policymakers alike are searching for innovative ways to ensure sufficient access to nutritious food, today and for generations to come. Unlike previous science-based initiatives to raise productivity in the agricultural sector (such as the Green Revolution), the potential of GM crops to combat food security and poverty challenges is muddled in hotly contested discussions.

The considerable expansion of GM crop varieties worldwide over the last two decades is indisputable. The total area devoted to GM crops has increased 100-fold from 1.7 million hectares in 1996 to 170 million hectares in 2012. Developing countries now grow more GM crops than developed countries (in terms of area), largely driven by Brazil's recent fast-paced adoption of GM crops. China is home to approximately 4 percent of the total global area devoted to GM crops. Soybeans, maize, cotton, and canola dominate GM crops globally, whereas China's focus is on cotton, papaya, and poplar.

To date, a wide body of (peer-reviewed) scientific impact studies shows that commercially-available GM crops are safe for people and the environment. According to a 2010 review of the safety of GM crops by the European Union, "the main conclusion to be drawn from the efforts of more than 130 research projects, covering a period of more than 25 years of research, and involving more than 500 independent research groups, is that biotechnology, and in particular GMOs, are not per se more risky than, for example, conventional plant breeding technologies." Other international and national scientific bodies, such as the World Health Organization, have reached the same conclusion.

1   2   Next  


Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Enter the words you see:   
    Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: ts20p1hellokittyshoes| 国产区香蕉精品系列在线观看不卡| 中文字幕av无码不卡| 日韩欧国产精品一区综合无码| 亚洲女初尝黑人巨高清| 男女下面一进一出免费无遮挡| 国产特级淫片免费看| 91精品国产免费久久国语蜜臀| 无遮无挡非常色的视频免费| 亚洲AV无码乱码国产精品| 秋霞午夜在线观看| 四虎国产永久在线观看| 试看120秒做受小视频免费| 国产成在线观看免费视频| (无码视频)在线观看| 在公车上被一个接一个| hd日本扒衣党视频播放| 日本电影免费久久精品| 亚洲精品乱码久久久久久蜜桃不卡| 精品一区二区三区在线观看l| 四虎AV永久在线精品免费观看| 蹂躏国际女刑警之屈服| 国产成人久久精品一区二区三区| free性欧美另类高清| 国产精品国产欧美综合一区| 91av视频网站| 国内精品久久久久久久久齐齐| baby直播看片下载| 女人张开腿让男人桶免费网站 | 中文字幕网资源站永久资源| 日本熟妇乱人伦XXXX| 久久精品亚洲综合一品| 日韩美女一级毛片| 乱码卡一卡二卡新区在线| 极品videossex日本妇| 免费看h片的网站| 精品国产一区二区三区久久影院 | 搞黄网站免费看| 亚洲一久久久久久久久| 欧美乱妇高清无乱码在线观看| 亚洲人成网国产最新在线|