Science has bigger say in GM food

By Shenggen Fan
0 Comment(s)Print E-mail China Daily, October 29, 2013
Adjust font size:

Whether genetically modified foods can help eradicate food insecurity and poverty has been the subject of contentious and polarizing debate.

Guinea pigs? [By Jiao Haiyang/China.org.cn]



The backdrop to this debate is a global agricultural system that is facing increasing challenges from rising climatic variability, population growth, urbanization, and natural resource depletion. According to the Food and Agriculture Organization, food production needs to increase by 60 percent by 2050 in order to feed 9 billion plus people. Scientists and policymakers alike are searching for innovative ways to ensure sufficient access to nutritious food, today and for generations to come. Unlike previous science-based initiatives to raise productivity in the agricultural sector (such as the Green Revolution), the potential of GM crops to combat food security and poverty challenges is muddled in hotly contested discussions.

The considerable expansion of GM crop varieties worldwide over the last two decades is indisputable. The total area devoted to GM crops has increased 100-fold from 1.7 million hectares in 1996 to 170 million hectares in 2012. Developing countries now grow more GM crops than developed countries (in terms of area), largely driven by Brazil's recent fast-paced adoption of GM crops. China is home to approximately 4 percent of the total global area devoted to GM crops. Soybeans, maize, cotton, and canola dominate GM crops globally, whereas China's focus is on cotton, papaya, and poplar.

To date, a wide body of (peer-reviewed) scientific impact studies shows that commercially-available GM crops are safe for people and the environment. According to a 2010 review of the safety of GM crops by the European Union, "the main conclusion to be drawn from the efforts of more than 130 research projects, covering a period of more than 25 years of research, and involving more than 500 independent research groups, is that biotechnology, and in particular GMOs, are not per se more risky than, for example, conventional plant breeding technologies." Other international and national scientific bodies, such as the World Health Organization, have reached the same conclusion.

1   2   Next  


Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Enter the words you see:   
    Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 欧美性色19p| 亚洲大香伊人蕉在人依线| 亚洲欧洲另类春色校园网站| 久久婷婷电影网| caoporn成人| 高清一级做a爱过程免费视频| 精品国精品自拍自在线| 欧美人妻精品一区二区三区| 成年丰满熟妇午夜免费视频| 国产精品第1页在线播放| 国99精品无码一区二区三区| 亚洲最大中文字幕| 两个人看的视频播放www| 手机看片福利久久| 精品国产一区二区三区久| 最近的中文字幕大全免费版| 女人扒下裤让男人桶到爽| 国产女人18毛片水真多1| 亚洲视频在线不卡| 中文字幕第3页| 在线视频你懂的国产福利| 精品国产一区二区| 日本高清护士xxxxx| 国产精品视频免费一区二区三区| 啊灬啊灬啊灬快灬深用力点| 亚洲va久久久噜噜噜久久狠狠| zooslook欧美另类最新| 黄色免费短视频| 毛片免费vip会员在线看| 成人网站在线进入爽爽爽| 国产成人综合久久精品亚洲| 亚洲欧美日韩综合一区久久| 一级一片一a一片| 荡公乱妇hd在线| 欧美jizzjizz在线播放| 在线成人a毛片免费播放| 动漫美女和男人羞羞漫画| 久久伊人精品热在75| 大战孕妇12p| 欧美黄色免费在线观看| 好猛好紧好硬使劲好大国产|