Science has bigger say in GM food

By Shenggen Fan
0 Comment(s)Print E-mail China Daily, October 29, 2013
Adjust font size:

Whether genetically modified foods can help eradicate food insecurity and poverty has been the subject of contentious and polarizing debate.

Guinea pigs? [By Jiao Haiyang/China.org.cn]



The backdrop to this debate is a global agricultural system that is facing increasing challenges from rising climatic variability, population growth, urbanization, and natural resource depletion. According to the Food and Agriculture Organization, food production needs to increase by 60 percent by 2050 in order to feed 9 billion plus people. Scientists and policymakers alike are searching for innovative ways to ensure sufficient access to nutritious food, today and for generations to come. Unlike previous science-based initiatives to raise productivity in the agricultural sector (such as the Green Revolution), the potential of GM crops to combat food security and poverty challenges is muddled in hotly contested discussions.

The considerable expansion of GM crop varieties worldwide over the last two decades is indisputable. The total area devoted to GM crops has increased 100-fold from 1.7 million hectares in 1996 to 170 million hectares in 2012. Developing countries now grow more GM crops than developed countries (in terms of area), largely driven by Brazil's recent fast-paced adoption of GM crops. China is home to approximately 4 percent of the total global area devoted to GM crops. Soybeans, maize, cotton, and canola dominate GM crops globally, whereas China's focus is on cotton, papaya, and poplar.

To date, a wide body of (peer-reviewed) scientific impact studies shows that commercially-available GM crops are safe for people and the environment. According to a 2010 review of the safety of GM crops by the European Union, "the main conclusion to be drawn from the efforts of more than 130 research projects, covering a period of more than 25 years of research, and involving more than 500 independent research groups, is that biotechnology, and in particular GMOs, are not per se more risky than, for example, conventional plant breeding technologies." Other international and national scientific bodies, such as the World Health Organization, have reached the same conclusion.

1   2   Next  


Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Enter the words you see:   
    Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 久久综合AV免费观看| 亚洲精品一二区| 韩国成人在线视频| 欧美BBBWBBWBBWBBW| 亚洲色图欧美在线| 麻麻张开腿让我爽了一夜黄文| 国产系列在线播放| 久久不见久久见免费影院www日本 久久不见久久见免费影院www日本 | 琪琪女色窝窝777777| 午夜男人一级毛片免费| 老师你的兔子好软水好多的车视频| 国产性猛交xx乱| aaaaa级毛片| 日本大乳高潮视频在线观看| 亚洲精品无码久久毛片| 真人无码作爱免费视频| 另类小说图片综合网| 色婷婷综合久久久久中文一区二区| 国产精品美女久久久网站| 99精品中文字幕| 扒开双腿疯狂进出爽爽爽动态图| 久久国产经典视频| 日韩精品免费视频| 亚洲精品欧洲精品| 男人桶女人羞羞漫画全集| 免费看大美女大黄大色| 黄网站色年片在线观看| 国产毛多水多高潮高清| 两个人看的www高清免费观看| 巨大黑人极品videos精品| 中文字幕乱码人妻综合二区三区| 无码任你躁久久久久久老妇| 亚洲国产成人精品女人久久久| 精品福利三区3d卡通动漫| 国产欧美精品区一区二区三区| 18禁黄污吃奶免费看网站| 国产美女视频免费看网站| 91国视频在线| 娇小bbb搡bbb搡bbb| 一区二区高清在线观看| 婷婷五月综合缴情在线视频|