Family policy deserves a rethink

By Mu Guangzong
0 Comment(s)Print E-mail China Daily, August 15, 2013
Adjust font size:

The National Health and Family Planning Commission has reiterated that even if the family planning policy were to be adjusted, it would not mean that couples could have a second baby if one of them came from a single-child family.

Nevertheless, it's time the authorities weighed the pros and cons of the family planning policy, which was implemented in the late 1970s to check population growth. There is no doubt that unchecked population growth in the 1980s and 1990s would have caused more harm than good to the families as well as to the country, because of the weak national economic foundation and already large population.

According to the current family planning policy, urban couples can have only one child. An urban couple can have a second child only if husband and wife both are from single-child families. In rural areas, though, couples have been allowed to have a second child if their firstborn is a girl. Ethnic groups other than Hans, on the other hand, have always been free to have two or more children.

The family planning policy has reduced the country's birth rate and curbed the rate of population growth, but it has also resulted in some harmful side effects, such as an imbalanced family structure, a skewed gender ratio, and an aging society.

Things have changed drastically since the late 1970s, so the authorities should give a serious thought to adjusting the family planning policy to suit the demands of the ongoing reform and opening-up.

In terms of happiness, social harmony and ideal population structure, a family should have two to three children, which is not possible in China under the present circumstances. But the authorities could, for example, allow couples to have a second child if one of them comes from a single-child family.

Contrary to what some people claim, this will not lead to a population boom, because the high cost of bringing up a child will dissuade a majority of such couples from having a second child. Besides, people's changed priorities because of the economic and social development of the past three decades will prevent many from having a second child. In particular, not many working women in urban areas would agree to undergo the trials and tribulations of labor twice all over. So even if the family planning policy is changed to allow more couples to have two children, not many families will avail of it.

In other words, although a change in the family planning policy may slightly increase the country's birth rate, it will not lead to a population boom. Instead, it could be an answer to China's current imbalanced population structure, aging population and waning demographic dividends.

Official data show that China had about 194 million people aged 60 years and above by 2012, which was 14.3 percent of the total population. Last year was also the first time when the percentage of working age population (aged 15-59) dropped, and going by statistical projections, China will lose its demographic dividends before 2030.

The country's population structure is like an inverted pyramid, with rising number of senior citizens at the top and shrinking number of youths at the bottom. As a result, senior citizens get to enjoy less and less social and family provisions, with parents who lost their only offspring when they were too old to have another suffering the most.

Allowing couples one of whom has no siblings to have a second child could ease, if not altogether solve, many of the above problems. Given the social and economic realities of the times, changing the family planning policy will help improve the family structure, increase provisions for the aged and promote harmony in society.

Moreover, "loosening" the family policy will curb the gender imbalance in China. Even though figures for the past three years suggest the gender ratio at birth has improved, the ratio is still 10 percentage points above the warning mark with newborn boys outnumbering girls by 10 percent.

Census data show that the gender ratio problem is still grave among adolescents and teenagers, and it is estimated that by 2020, China will have 24 million more men than women of marriageable age.

By allowing more families to have a second child, the authorities will help curb the gender imbalance, because then fewer couple will go in for illegal prenatal sex discernment tests of fetuses and female feticide.

To build a balanced population structure, the authorities have to take measures to gradually allow more couples to have a second child on a trial basis, and eventually move toward a two-child policy. And to establish an ideal population policy, the government has to fulfill some additional responsibilities of providing support for couples and improving welfare services.

The author is a columnist with China.org.cn. For more information please visit:http://www.ccgp-fushun.com/opinion/muguangzong.htm

Opinion articles reflect the views of their authors, not necessarily those of China.org.cn.

 

Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Enter the words you see:   
    Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 一本久道中文无码字幕av| 亚洲一区二区三区欧美| 美女扒开屁股给男人看无遮挡| 国产成熟女人性满足视频| 91东航翘臀女神在线播放| 女bbbbxxxx另类亚洲| 中国一级毛片在线观看| 日本xxxxx19| 久久精品aⅴ无码中文字字幕| 欧美在线视频a| 亚洲欧美日韩国产vr在线观| 男人和女人在床做黄的网站| 午夜dj在线观看免费高清在线| 青苹果乐园影视免费观看电视剧hd | 2019国产开嫩苞视频| 大学生男男澡堂69gaysex| xxxwww欧美性| 尤物国午夜精品福利网站| 中文字幕aⅴ人妻一区二区| 无遮挡韩国成人羞羞漫画视频| 久久夜色精品国产亚洲| 日韩高清一级毛片| 亚洲av无码国产一区二区三区| 欧美怡红院免费的全部视频| 亚洲欧美日韩在线综合福利| 深夜动态福利gif动态进| 偷自拍亚洲视频在线观看| 精品久久久久香蕉网| 卡通动漫精品一区二区三区| 美女羞羞免费视频网站| 国产69精品久久久久9999| 色综合久久天天综合| 国产乱码一区二区三区爽爽爽| 香港aa三级久久三级不卡| 国产成人精品视频网站| 国产麻豆91网在线看| 国产无套乱子伦精彩是白视频 | 成人观看网站a| 国产日韩在线看| 久久五月激情婷婷日韩| 国产欧美在线不卡|