What Panetta's visit means

By Zhao Xiaozhuo
0 Comment(s)Print E-mail China Daily, September 13, 2012
Adjust font size:

US Defense Secretary Leon Panetta is scheduled to visit China later this month amid rising tensions between China and Japan over the sovereignty of the Diaoyu Islands and the ongoing US-Japan joint exercise purported to take over the islands. Also, China is getting increasingly worried over the United States' role in Beijing's territorial disputes with some of its neighbors, Washington's strategy for the Asia-Pacific region and the strategic distrust between the two countries' militaries. So what can be expected from Panetta's first visit to China as Pentagon chief?

Panetta's visit, in my personal opinion, will help China understand US strategic intentions. This year has seen a great change in Washington's military strategy. On Jan 5, the US Defense Department released a non-classified version of its strategic defense guideline, "Sustaining US Global Leadership: Priorities for 21st Century Defense", which announced the shift in US strategic focus from the Middle East to Asia-Pacific. Speaking at the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore on June 2, Panetta outlined details of the US plan for its "rebalance" toward Asia-Pacific, saying the US Navy will reposition 60 percent of its warships in Asia-Pacific by 2020 as part of its new military strategy.

When the dispute between China and the Philippines over the sovereignty of the Huangyan Islands in the South China Sea heated up in April, the US, then engaged in a joint military drill with the Philippines, supported Manila's aggressive attitude. Now when China is at odds with Japan over the Diaoyu Islands dispute, the US is holding controversial joint exercises with Japan in Tinian, Guam, and Saipan.

Conflicting signals sent by the US exacerbate China's suspicion about Washington's strategic intentions. Although high-ranking US officials have denied that Washington's actions are aimed at Beijing, the circle around China orchestrated by the US seems to be tightening.

Washington says it is not taking sides in the Diaoyu Islands dispute, but US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has claimed that the islands fall within the scope of the US-Japan security treaty. And although the US says it has no intention of getting involved in the South China Sea disputes, it criticizes China for setting up a military garrison in the newly built Sansha city in Hainan province.

The conflicting signals from the US have left China confused, and Panetta needs to clear this confusion.

The Pentagon chief's visit to China, however, will help promote military-to-military strategic trust and reduce misunderstanding between the US and China. China and the US are significantly different in many aspects, including social systems, degrees of development, cultures and traditions, and international perceptions, which often leads to different interests in and different views on a broad range of important issues.

Over the past 20-odd years bilateral military relationship, the most fragile in Sino-US ties, has gone through ups and downs, and strategic talks have been suspended at least six times, mostly because of US arms sales to Taiwan. It demonstrates that Sino-US military ties lack an inherent driving force, for which mutual strategic distrust is to blame. This distrust has led to the on-and-off cycle in bilateral military ties. And frequent suspensions of military talks increase anxiety and lead to deeper distrust, turning the relationship into a vicious circle.

Given this backdrop, bilateral exchange is extremely important if the two countries want to promote understanding and reduce miscalculations, particularly at the higher-level leadership, because the American and Chinese approaches to military exchanges are diametrically opposite. While the US relies on a "bottom-up" approach, starting with lower-level contacts to work toward mutual understanding and then strategic agreement, China follows a "trickle-down" relationship in which an agreement on strategic issues results in understanding and then allows for specific activities later.

The US may believe that military trust is an outcome of frequent exchanges at different levels and the development of people-to-people understanding, thus putting greater emphasis on various kinds of exchanges. However, China thinks that political trust is a prerequisite for military trust, not vice versa. If there is no basic trust at the political level, how can military trust be established?

Recognizing the importance of higher-level exchanges, in the past two years, high-ranking military visits between the two powers have maintained a positive momentum. Defense Minister General Liang Guanglie visited Washington in May and Deputy Chief of General Staff Cai Yingting did so in August. In between, US Pacific commander Admiral Samuel Locklear visited Beijing in July.

Panetta's visit will be conducive to promoting China-US military cooperation. Since non-traditional security threats pose a real problem for China, the US and other countries, China and the US need to cooperate on the security front to counter them. They have to find more common grounds to deal with security challenges of a global nature such as international terrorism and proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. No country can tackle these problems alone, and no country can be safe from or immune to them. China and the US have a common interest in meeting such challenges.

During Liang's visit to the US in May, both countries agreed to enhance exchanges and cooperation in humanitarian assistance, disaster relief and other fields. They also agreed to conduct joint humanitarian relief and anti-piracy exercises later this year.

Panetta's visit is expected to push forward bilateral military cooperation, which is extremely important for long-term bilateral military ties given the possibility of changes in military leadership both in the US and China this year. Expanding and deepening military cooperation will improve strategic mutual trust, and forge conditions necessary for resolving bilateral differences and sensitive issues.

But since Sino-US military relationship is complex and fragile, not too much can be expected from Panetta's visit.

The author is a senior colonel and deputy director of the Center on China-America Defense Relations, Academy of Military Science, PLA.

 

Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Enter the words you see:   
    Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 久久精品99视频| 亚洲自偷精品视频自拍| 久久久高清日本道免费观看| 欧美精品久久一区二区三区| 免费毛片a线观看| 老公去上班的午后时光| 国产成人亚洲精品无码av大片| 1区2区3区产品乱码免费| 在线观看视频中文字幕| www.日日爱| 成人h动漫精品一区二区无码| 久久久国产精品亚洲一区| 曰韩无码二三区中文字幕| 亚洲午夜爱爱香蕉片| 欧美视频在线网站| 亚洲黄色在线视频| 看**视频一一级毛片| 午夜小视频免费| 日本免费一区二区在线观看| 国产综合在线观看视频| 99热免费在线观看| 天天狠天天透天干天天怕∴| 一本大道高清香蕉中文大在线| 护士的护士服被扒了下来小说| 久久人人妻人人做人人爽| 污污视频在线免费看| 免费a级毛片无码专区| 韩国男女无遮挡高清性视频| 国产真实伦实例| 16女性下面扒开无遮挡免费| 国产视频福利一区| 999在线视频精品免费播放观看| 天堂一区二区三区精品| 久久人人爽人人爽人人片AV东京热| 最近免费中文字幕mv在线电影| 亚洲国产成人精品无码区花野真一| 欧美综合色另类图片区| 亚洲精品国产福利在线观看| 老子影院午夜理伦手机| 国产丝袜视频一区二区三区| 要灬要灬再深点受不了好舒服|