What Panetta's visit means

By Zhao Xiaozhuo
0 Comment(s)Print E-mail China Daily, September 13, 2012
Adjust font size:

US Defense Secretary Leon Panetta is scheduled to visit China later this month amid rising tensions between China and Japan over the sovereignty of the Diaoyu Islands and the ongoing US-Japan joint exercise purported to take over the islands. Also, China is getting increasingly worried over the United States' role in Beijing's territorial disputes with some of its neighbors, Washington's strategy for the Asia-Pacific region and the strategic distrust between the two countries' militaries. So what can be expected from Panetta's first visit to China as Pentagon chief?

Panetta's visit, in my personal opinion, will help China understand US strategic intentions. This year has seen a great change in Washington's military strategy. On Jan 5, the US Defense Department released a non-classified version of its strategic defense guideline, "Sustaining US Global Leadership: Priorities for 21st Century Defense", which announced the shift in US strategic focus from the Middle East to Asia-Pacific. Speaking at the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore on June 2, Panetta outlined details of the US plan for its "rebalance" toward Asia-Pacific, saying the US Navy will reposition 60 percent of its warships in Asia-Pacific by 2020 as part of its new military strategy.

When the dispute between China and the Philippines over the sovereignty of the Huangyan Islands in the South China Sea heated up in April, the US, then engaged in a joint military drill with the Philippines, supported Manila's aggressive attitude. Now when China is at odds with Japan over the Diaoyu Islands dispute, the US is holding controversial joint exercises with Japan in Tinian, Guam, and Saipan.

Conflicting signals sent by the US exacerbate China's suspicion about Washington's strategic intentions. Although high-ranking US officials have denied that Washington's actions are aimed at Beijing, the circle around China orchestrated by the US seems to be tightening.

Washington says it is not taking sides in the Diaoyu Islands dispute, but US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has claimed that the islands fall within the scope of the US-Japan security treaty. And although the US says it has no intention of getting involved in the South China Sea disputes, it criticizes China for setting up a military garrison in the newly built Sansha city in Hainan province.

The conflicting signals from the US have left China confused, and Panetta needs to clear this confusion.

The Pentagon chief's visit to China, however, will help promote military-to-military strategic trust and reduce misunderstanding between the US and China. China and the US are significantly different in many aspects, including social systems, degrees of development, cultures and traditions, and international perceptions, which often leads to different interests in and different views on a broad range of important issues.

Over the past 20-odd years bilateral military relationship, the most fragile in Sino-US ties, has gone through ups and downs, and strategic talks have been suspended at least six times, mostly because of US arms sales to Taiwan. It demonstrates that Sino-US military ties lack an inherent driving force, for which mutual strategic distrust is to blame. This distrust has led to the on-and-off cycle in bilateral military ties. And frequent suspensions of military talks increase anxiety and lead to deeper distrust, turning the relationship into a vicious circle.

Given this backdrop, bilateral exchange is extremely important if the two countries want to promote understanding and reduce miscalculations, particularly at the higher-level leadership, because the American and Chinese approaches to military exchanges are diametrically opposite. While the US relies on a "bottom-up" approach, starting with lower-level contacts to work toward mutual understanding and then strategic agreement, China follows a "trickle-down" relationship in which an agreement on strategic issues results in understanding and then allows for specific activities later.

The US may believe that military trust is an outcome of frequent exchanges at different levels and the development of people-to-people understanding, thus putting greater emphasis on various kinds of exchanges. However, China thinks that political trust is a prerequisite for military trust, not vice versa. If there is no basic trust at the political level, how can military trust be established?

Recognizing the importance of higher-level exchanges, in the past two years, high-ranking military visits between the two powers have maintained a positive momentum. Defense Minister General Liang Guanglie visited Washington in May and Deputy Chief of General Staff Cai Yingting did so in August. In between, US Pacific commander Admiral Samuel Locklear visited Beijing in July.

Panetta's visit will be conducive to promoting China-US military cooperation. Since non-traditional security threats pose a real problem for China, the US and other countries, China and the US need to cooperate on the security front to counter them. They have to find more common grounds to deal with security challenges of a global nature such as international terrorism and proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. No country can tackle these problems alone, and no country can be safe from or immune to them. China and the US have a common interest in meeting such challenges.

During Liang's visit to the US in May, both countries agreed to enhance exchanges and cooperation in humanitarian assistance, disaster relief and other fields. They also agreed to conduct joint humanitarian relief and anti-piracy exercises later this year.

Panetta's visit is expected to push forward bilateral military cooperation, which is extremely important for long-term bilateral military ties given the possibility of changes in military leadership both in the US and China this year. Expanding and deepening military cooperation will improve strategic mutual trust, and forge conditions necessary for resolving bilateral differences and sensitive issues.

But since Sino-US military relationship is complex and fragile, not too much can be expected from Panetta's visit.

The author is a senior colonel and deputy director of the Center on China-America Defense Relations, Academy of Military Science, PLA.

 

Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Enter the words you see:   
    Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲乱码国产一区三区| 农村老熟妇乱子伦视频| 55夜色66夜色国产精品视频| 好爽好深胸好大好多水视频| 久久99国产视频| 日韩精品免费一区二区三区| 亚洲成av人在线视| 激情网站免费看| 免费国产a理论片| 美女一级一级毛片| 国产乱人视频在线看| 黑粗硬大欧美在线视频试看 | 亚洲成年人影院| 熟妇人妻不卡中文字幕| 北条麻妃中文字幕免观在线| 色聚网久久综合| 国产又大又长又粗又硬的免费视频| www一区二区| 国产色无码精品视频国产| 99热在线获取最新地址| 忘忧草社区中文字幕| 久久人妻夜夜做天天爽| 极品色天使在线婷婷天堂亚洲| 亚洲精品午夜国产va久久| 精品久久久久香蕉网| 国产人妖xxxx做受视频| 欧美色图第三页| 国产精品无圣光一区二区| 95免费观看体验区视频| 天天躁夜夜躁狠狠躁2023| 一级毛片免费不卡| 成年女人黄小视频| 久久久久免费精品国产小说| 日韩精品一区二区三区在线观看 | 亚洲欧美日韩综合一区久久| 玉蒲团之偷情宝鉴电影| 免费高清资源黄网站在线观看| 美女被视频在线看九色| 国产一级伦理片| 超碰97人人做人人爱少妇| 国产日产欧产精品精品电影|