As economy fails, Nobel Prize still favors US

0 Comment(s)Print E-mail People's Daily, December 14, 2011
Adjust font size:

Two U.S. economists were recently awarded the 2011 Nobel Prize in Economics at a time when the U.S. economy was facing difficulties and the "Occupy Wall Street" movement was spreading like wildfire across the country.

Fifty out of 69 winners of the Nobel Prize in Economics, which was introduced in 1969, are Americans. The U.S. economy has been plagued by financial and debt crises over the past five years, causing great damage to the world economy, but Americans still make up over 90 percent of all the winners of the prize. This phenomenon deserves special attention.

Is the Nobel committee's preference for American economists fair? Today's American-style capitalism has become finance monopoly capitalism, in which financial magnates control the country's economic and political affairs, and real economy has been disconnected from virtual economy. The real economy has been hollowed out, wealth is highly centralized, and unemployment remains high.

American economists have not worked out any effective solutions to these problems as well as the financial and economic crises. Even the two economist who won the 2011 Nobel Prize in Economics for their research on the cause and effect of government policies on the broader economy do not see any simple solutions to global economic problems.

Given the above facts, it is unconvincing to grant the prize to so many Americans. From the Nobel committee's bias in assessing winners of the prize in other categories, it is not hard to draw a conclusion that they are partial to U.S. economists because they favor the capitalist system and theories of the United States.

In order to whitewash the flaws in the capitalist system and theories, the Nobel committee mainly made up of Westerners has chosen to ignore the obvious and has deviated from the path of objectivity and fairness.

Facts speak louder than words. A theory's potential for practical application should be the final criterion for determining if it is scientific. Let us look at the economic development situation of China since its reform and opening up from this point of view.

Over the past 30 years or so since 1978, China's economy has maintained a GDP growth rate of higher than 9 percent and has become the world's second largest economy and top exporting country at the moment, with its foreign exchange reserves ranked first in the world.

In recent years, the contribution rate of China's economic growth to that of the world has been beyond 10 percent. Practice is the sole criterion for testing truth. China's sound economic development proves its theory and polices are scientific.

Since the Third Plenary Session of the 11th Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party, China has opened up the road of socialism with Chinese characteristics, formed the theoretical system of socialism with Chinese characteristics and established socialism with Chinese characteristics through hard exploration by all ethnic groups under leadership of the Party. We cannot form this unique "Chinese style" and win the Chinese people's wholehearted support without the direction of these innovative theories.

China is also regarded as "a powerful engine driving the growth of the world economy" and "the leading role of the most significant economic revolution in human history." For this matter, the socialist economic theory with Chinese characteristics is undoubtedly scientific and should play a part in the theoretical framework governing the world economic system. Only praise from the people is a real prize and only a theory capable of directing people's practice is a real scientific theory.

We must admit that the Nobel Prize, as a great internationally-renowned prize, played an important role in promoting human civilization and progress in the history. However, some practices in its social prize items have been questioned in recent years, and the authority, fairness and influence of these prize items are weakening.

We clearly know that our theoretical and practical explorations and innovations are not aimed at flaunting ourselves or winning the prize. No "big international prize" will distract China from its own business or weaken China's confidence on the development road and mode it has independently chosen.

As long as China persists on and further widens its socialist road with Chinese characteristics, enriches and develop its socialist theoretical system and adheres to and improves its socialist system, China will definitely be able to realize the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation and make new contributions to human civilization.

 

Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 99国产精品视频免费观看| 国产农村妇女精品一二区| 一本大道香蕉久在线不卡视频| 欧美黑人激情性久久| 午夜国产在线观看| 色多多在线观看视频| 国产成人AV免费观看| 1000部夫妻午夜免费| 国语对白做受XXXXX在线中国| h小视频在线观看| 少妇高潮无套内谢麻豆传| 中文字幕人妻三级中文无码视频| 日本被强制侵犯亚洲系列播放| 亚洲美女又黄又爽在线观看| 美女裸免费观看网站| 国产亚洲精品自在久久| 91精品啪在线观看国产18| 在线观看日韩一区| 国产三级毛片视频| 国产精品嫩草影院人体模特| 国产精品麻豆va在线播放| 99久久中文字幕伊人| 扒开腿狂躁女人爽出白浆| 亚洲国产精品久久久久久| 波多野结衣一区二区| 人人澡人人澡人人看添av| 白丝爆浆18禁一区二区三区| 国产偷人视频免费观看| 97碰公开在线观看免费视频| 国产猛烈高潮尖叫视频免费| 你懂得视频在线观看| 国产精品欧美在线不卡| 337p色噜噜| 国产精品美女久久久网av| 91精品国产综合久久久久久| 国内精品免费视频自在线 | 青青青青久久国产片免费精品 | 男人天堂网在线| 健身私教干了好几次| 男人j桶进女人p无遮挡免费观看 | 亚洲精品无码专区在线播放|