Is the mountain big enough?

By Tylor Claggett
0 Comment(s)Print E-mail China.org.cn, November 24, 2011
Adjust font size:

Dominoes  [By Jiao Haiyang/China.org.cn]

Dominoes? [By Jiao Haiyang/China.org.cn] 

Recently, President Barack Obama hosted the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) summit in Honolulu, Hawaii. Tough talking in front 21 APEC nations and a world audience, the U.S. President chided China (by saying it was time for China to act like a "grown up") and its economic policies that, in the minds of many, have left the value of the Chinese currency artificially low, which in turn has harmed American companies and increased unemployment in the U.S. China retorted by saying the U.S. does not dictate terms to China on trade and other international affairs unless Chinese policymakers agree. This dialogue is a continuation in a long running spate that lately has been heating up.

One has to speculate that part of this tougher talk from the U.S. side is due to the approaching 2012 elections. Obama wants to counter Republican claims that his administration has been too easy on China and that part of the current U.S. economic malaise is China's fault. The Trans Pacific Partnership (announced at the APEC) is billed as a precursor to a broad pan-pacific free trade zone. However, it appears to the Chinese as an American-led effort to isolate China among its Southeast Asian neighbors by (again) setting the rules of trade and commerce.

The Chinese consider the announcement that the U.S. will station military aircraft and up to 2,500 troops in Australia as offensive and tangible evidence that the U.S. wants to weaken Chinese influence in the region, even though the proposed military presence is 5,500 miles from China. Part of the unspoken reasoning is China's claim of sovereignty over the entire South China Sea, which is in conflict with many other Southeast Asian nations' claims. From a strategic perspective, by continuing its military presence in Japan and South Korea and by establishing a military presence in Australia, the U.S. may be able to keep China's military preoccupied and pinned down in its own backyard.

Yet despite the heated rhetoric in public and maneuvering behind the scenes, both nations in fact need each other in multiple ways in order to advance. For example, an easy way for the Chinese to let the yuan strengthen against the U.S. dollar is for the People's Bank of China to reduce its buying of U.S. Treasury (UST) securities. By just not lending as much or by simply failing to rollover all UST debt that matures, the Chinese would cause significant strengthening of the yuan because the demand for U.S. dollars would be dramatically reduced. However, there would be significant consequences in such a move.

First, the U.S. government would have to pay much more for any new debt and for the debt it already has. This would significantly impact all federal spending programs because the U.S. budget would be much tighter than it already is. Next, the monetary policy laid out by the U.S. Federal Reserve to keep interest rates very low through 2013 would be in total disarray. Third, more expensive Chinese products in American markets would put upward pressure of consumer prices in the U.S. These three aspects of a stronger yuan, by virtue of less Chinese lending, would all but certain cause negative economic growth in the U.S. There is a fourth point to consider: a stronger yuan would allow China to buy raw materials (process trade) from foreign sources cheaper; therefore, some Chinese finished goods might actually be cheaper in U.S. dollars.

In China, a stronger yuan would make American products cheaper, and foreign exports would surely be reduced – causing higher Chinese unemployment. Higher unemployment in China could very well increase civil unrest that is already on the rise. A less stable China is certainly not in the best interest of the U.S.

So, both sides have much at stake in the current stage of the ongoing dialogue. As Warren Buffet said in a Nov. 14 interview: "it's not in our interest to start getting really furious with each other. And there will be tensions. We'll want to play the game our way. They'll want to play the game their way and we'll both have to give in some cases." With all of this being said, it appears the U.S. and China should engage in serious and continuous negotiating sessions behind closed doors – if they are not already doing so. In the meantime, both parties should try their best to understand as much of the background reality as possible. This too is in all likelihood already occurring.

The Chinese have an old saying: "No mountain is big enough for two tigers." Today, the world seems to be the mountain and the two tigers China and the U.S. The two tigers need to treat each other as litter mates.

The author is a columnist with China.org.cn. For more information please visit: http://www.ccgp-fushun.com/opinion/tylorclaggett.htm

Opinion articles reflect the views of their authors, not necessarily those of China.org.cn.

 

Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 精品国产国产综合精品| 亚洲一区二区三区无码国产| 被公侵犯电影bd在线播放| 成人免费一区二区三区在线观看| 亚州无吗黄瓜视频有直播的不| 欧美日韩国产一区二区 | 又硬又大又湿又紧a视频| 遭绝伦三个老头侵犯波多野结衣| 国产成年网站v片在线观看| 100款夜间禁用b站软件下载| 在线亚洲精品视频| a级毛片免费在线观看| 婷婷五月综合缴情在线视频| 中文乱码人妻系列一区二区| 欧美在线观看免费一区视频| 亚洲精品国产国语| 男人把女人桶爽30分钟一| 再灬再灬再灬深一点舒服| 美女大量吞精在线观看456| 国产破处在线视频| 521色香蕉网站在线观看| 国模无码一区二区三区不卡| bestialityvideo另类骆驼| 小13箩利洗澡无码视频网站| 中文japanese在线播放| 成年女性特黄午夜视频免费看| 久久久久免费看黄a级试看| 日本视频在线免费| 久久精品影院永久网址| 日韩精品无码一区二区三区AV| 亚洲a无码综合a国产av中文| 欧美专区在线播放| 亚洲人成无码www久久久| 欧美性xxxxx极品| 亚洲国产综合网| 欧美国产一区二区三区激情无套 | 亚洲а∨天堂久久精品| 欧美丰满熟妇XXXX性大屁股| 亚洲午夜无码久久| 欧美亚洲国产片在线播放| 亚洲人成网站18禁止久久影院|