The global protests against capitalism

By Heiko Khoo
0 Comment(s)Print E-mail China.org.cn, October 18, 2011
Adjust font size:

Extreme redistribution [By Jiao Haiyang/China.org.cn]

Extreme redistribution [By Jiao Haiyang/China.org.cn]

The international occupation of squares will define the history of 2011. First those that burst out in the Arab Spring to bring down long-standing dictatorships and then those that developed in Spain and the United States, which touched off a wave of sympathy protests around the world.

The protests in the United States have finally given voice to the generalized discontent against corporate and banking excess. They have exposed the embedded relationship between economic and political power; long-established connections within the state and civil society, that bind layer upon layer of power and exploitation together. Now that the economic reproduction of the system has broken down, these relations are revealed as systemic corruption and nepotism, all concealed beneath a thin veneer of democratic procedures.

The brutality of the free market is accepted when significant layers of the working class feel that their interests are at one with those of their superiors. These circumstances of organic reproduction of the capitalist social system are rooted in economic development and improving opportunities and conditions. The American Dream required many small examples of "pauper to president" style advancement, to anchor itself in popular consciousness and become a material force.

The American Dream, like all dreams, according to Sigmund Freud, was a symbolic representation of unresolved conflicts. Conflicts caused by unspoken experiences and traumas, and which expose the sham illusion of the unity of all classes in the nation. Moments of exorcism of such ghosts are always traumatic and explosive, as one form of dream disappears and anger about this loss of innocence finds expression.

The questions asked lead to dark places. The disfigurement of more than 30,000 U.S. soldiers in Iraq, the death of more than 4,000 was this all simply serving the interests and agenda of the rich and powerful and not those of the people? Were any wars in the 20th century serving the people? Were the banks and major corporations once upon a time serving the people? Or were they always profit-seeking exploiters manipulating the masses, using the theater of democratic procedure as a cover?

The U.S. protests gain their vitality from the lack of an encrusted labor bureaucracy. In Europe, for over a hundred years, social democratic reform acted as a buffer to capture the anger of the working classes and channel it into reformist demands for welfare rights and democratic improvements within capitalism. But such demands were muted in the U.S. political mainstream because of, firstly, its imperial ascendancy and virulent anti-communism after World War II, and secondly, its capacity to develop the economy at a rate capable of absorbing internal discontent.

The epoch of U.S. global economic dominance appears to be coming to an end, its internal balance of class forces is unstable and being questioned. Pressure to provide reforms for the masses instead of bailouts for the super rich will become overwhelming. This in turn will shatter the political balance of power, thrusting the working classes and the poor into a decisive position within U.S. politics. The idea of a mass party of the working class if scattered in the winds from the occupation movement will certainly fall on fertile ground.

In Europe, the reformists are embedded to capitalist power relations and so offer no proposals and make no attempt to capitalize on the crisis. Instead of standing at the head of social unrest, they tail-end it waiting for their chance to show their loyalty to the existing order by condemning violence and calling for dialogue. A radical rebirth of the workers' movement is likely to spring forth over the many months and years of bitter struggle that lie ahead.

It appears that the tide of public opinion in the West is shifting inexorably against the existing structure of wealth and power. A world in which a few hundred billionaires own more personal wealth than half the population of the world is no longer considered tolerable. As waves of social discontent bring ever-larger layers of the working classes and the middle classes into activity, the central demands for economic transformation will come to focus on public ownership and democratic control of the banks and the commanding heights of the economy.

The author is a columnist with China.org.cn. For more information please visit:

http://www.ccgp-fushun.com/opinion/heikokhoo.htm

Opinion articles reflect the views of their authors, not necessarily those of China.org.cn

 

Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲精品综合久久中文字幕| 日本免费一区二区三区高清视频| 免费的一级黄色片| 蜜桃麻豆www久久国产精品| 天天干天天爱天天操| 中文字幕国产在线| 日韩中文字幕网| 亚洲AV无码专区在线亚| 窝窝视频成人影院午夜在线| 国产一区二区三区日韩精品| 97国产在线视频| 天天摸天天看天天做天天爽| 久久精品国产精品青草| 草莓视频aqq| 国产精品狼人久久久久影院| av一本久道久久波多野结衣| 年轻人影院www你懂的| 中文字幕在线资源| 日本一道在线观看| 亚洲国产三级在线观看| 精品无人区麻豆乱码1区2区| 国产日产精品系列推荐| 26uuu页面升级| 国语精品91自产拍在线观看二区| narutomanga玖辛奈本子| 少妇无码一区二区二三区| 中文国产在线观看| 曰批免费视频播放30分钟直播| 亚洲色成人WWW永久网站| 菠萝菠萝蜜在线免费视频| 国产在线精品99一卡2卡| 国产成人精品一区二区秒拍| 国产欧美日韩在线| 99久久无色码中文字幕| 天天躁日日躁aaaaxxxx| wwwxxx国产| 日本xxwwxxww在线视频免费| 亚洲午夜福利在线视频| 欧美日韩黄色片| 免费福利在线播放| 精品国产v无码大片在线观看|