The Buffett Rule: A path to tax reform?

By Tylor Claggett
0 Comment(s)Print E-mail China.org.cn, September 24, 2011
Adjust font size:

During a recent stump speech promoting his new plan to create jobs and reduce the U.S. budget deficit, U.S. president Barack Obama said that wealthy Americans have enjoyed lower tax rates as a result of cuts during the Bush administration that were promoted as "temporary." In addition for calling for a rollback of tax rates for the wealthiest Americans, Obama implied that loopholes in the U.S. tax code benefitted high-earners.

"Those who have done well, including me, should pay our fair share in taxes to contribute to the nation that made our success possible. We shouldn't get a better deal than ordinary families get," Obama said.

But what exactly constitutes taxable income in America, especially for the wealthy?

According to recent New York Times op-ed, American billionaire investor and Berkshire Hathaway chairman Warren Buffett said that only 17.4 percent of his income last year went to taxes, a lower percentage than the 20 other people working in his office, even his secretary. The main reason for this, Buffett said, is that wages are taxed at a higher rate than capital gains, where Buffett makes most of his money. In addition, social security tax only applies to the first $106,800 in wages, which largely exempts high earners from their share of responsibility.

A recent CNN piece further elaborates on Buffett's statement, coined as the 'Buffett Rule'. "In terms of averages, the current tax system already satisfies the Buffett Rule. Americans on average pay 16 percent of their total income in federal income and payroll taxes, while millionaires pay an average of 20.1 percent, according to the Tax Policy Center," the report said.

Despite loopholes in the tax code, the article also argues that Buffett actually pays higher taxes if you factor in corporate taxes paid on his large share of Berkshire Hathaway. Corporate tax rates range between 15-38 percent, making them often higher than personal income tax rates.

Others would argue that the wealthy are in the best position to create new jobs, especially if they are able to divert tax dollars to wages for their employees.

When "one size, fits all" proposals are made again and again, the devil tends to be in the details.

The author is a columnist with China.org.cn. For more information please visit: http://www.ccgp-fushun.com/opinion/tylorclaggett.htm

Opinion articles reflect the views of their authors, not necessarily those of China.org.cn.

Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 欧美午夜小视频| 精品国产一区二区三区久久狼| 国内a级毛片免费···| 一级做a爱片特黄在线观看yy| 日本熟妇乱人伦XXXX| 亚洲av无码国产综合专区| 欧美老人巨大xxxx做受视频| 伊人久久精品亚洲午夜| 精品无码一区二区三区爱欲| 日本三人交xxx69视频| 亚洲av无码乱码在线观看| 欧美激情第1页| 伊人色综合九久久天天蜜桃 | 韩国伦理片年轻的妈妈| 天天摸天天做天天爽| 中文字幕一区二区三区四区| 日本天堂视频在线观看| 亚洲av成人一区二区三区| 欧美成人免费一区在线播放| 亚洲男人电影天堂| 热久久国产精品| 你是我的女人中文字幕高清| 精品国产a∨无码一区二区三区| 四月婷婷七月婷婷综合| 色天天天综合色天天碰| 国产亚州精品女人久久久久久| 麻豆亚洲av熟女国产一区二| 埋在老师腿间喝圣水| 一个人看的免费观看日本视频www| 成人永久免费福利视频app| 久久96国产精品| 日本一本高清视频| 久久亚洲精品无码| 日韩a毛片免费观看| 久久精品国产亚洲av忘忧草18 | 啊灬啊灬啊灬快灬深久久| 色婷婷亚洲一区二区三区| 国产乱子伦农村XXXX| 蜜桃麻豆www久久囤产精品| 国产亚洲视频网站| 跪在校花脚下叼着女主人的鞋|