The Buffett Rule: A path to tax reform?

By Tylor Claggett
0 Comment(s)Print E-mail China.org.cn, September 24, 2011
Adjust font size:

During a recent stump speech promoting his new plan to create jobs and reduce the U.S. budget deficit, U.S. president Barack Obama said that wealthy Americans have enjoyed lower tax rates as a result of cuts during the Bush administration that were promoted as "temporary." In addition for calling for a rollback of tax rates for the wealthiest Americans, Obama implied that loopholes in the U.S. tax code benefitted high-earners.

"Those who have done well, including me, should pay our fair share in taxes to contribute to the nation that made our success possible. We shouldn't get a better deal than ordinary families get," Obama said.

But what exactly constitutes taxable income in America, especially for the wealthy?

According to recent New York Times op-ed, American billionaire investor and Berkshire Hathaway chairman Warren Buffett said that only 17.4 percent of his income last year went to taxes, a lower percentage than the 20 other people working in his office, even his secretary. The main reason for this, Buffett said, is that wages are taxed at a higher rate than capital gains, where Buffett makes most of his money. In addition, social security tax only applies to the first $106,800 in wages, which largely exempts high earners from their share of responsibility.

A recent CNN piece further elaborates on Buffett's statement, coined as the 'Buffett Rule'. "In terms of averages, the current tax system already satisfies the Buffett Rule. Americans on average pay 16 percent of their total income in federal income and payroll taxes, while millionaires pay an average of 20.1 percent, according to the Tax Policy Center," the report said.

Despite loopholes in the tax code, the article also argues that Buffett actually pays higher taxes if you factor in corporate taxes paid on his large share of Berkshire Hathaway. Corporate tax rates range between 15-38 percent, making them often higher than personal income tax rates.

Others would argue that the wealthy are in the best position to create new jobs, especially if they are able to divert tax dollars to wages for their employees.

When "one size, fits all" proposals are made again and again, the devil tends to be in the details.

The author is a columnist with China.org.cn. For more information please visit: http://www.ccgp-fushun.com/opinion/tylorclaggett.htm

Opinion articles reflect the views of their authors, not necessarily those of China.org.cn.

Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comment(s)

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 男人团vip每日更新番号库| 久久久久亚洲AV成人网| 视频二区在线观看| 国产精品国产三级国产普通话一| 久久久久久夜精品精品免费啦| 校花小冉黑人系列小说| 古代肉多荤话文高h| 色老板在线视频一区二区| 夜爽爽爽爽爽影院| 久久久久人妻精品一区三寸| 欧洲吸奶大片在线看| 动漫人物差差差动漫网站| 青青国产成人久久激情91麻豆| 国产精华av午夜在线观看| 一本一本久久a久久综合精品蜜桃| 日本动漫丝袜腿交榨精漫画| 亚洲国产成人久久精品app| 正在播放julia女教师| 四虎影永久在线高清免费| 男女一边摸一边爽爽视频| 国模吧双双大尺度炮交gogo| 中文精品久久久久人妻不卡| 欧美成人在线网站| 制服丝袜一区二区三区| 羞羞社区在线观看视频| 国产三级在线观看a| 香蕉视频一区二区三区| 国产麻豆精品一区二区三区V视界 国产麻豆精品久久一二三 | 国内精自线i品一区202| av在线亚洲男人的天堂| 无码人妻av一二区二区三区| 久久免费视频一区| 欧美在线一级视频| 免费国产美女爽到喷出水来视频| 韩国理伦大片三女教师| 国产精品日本一区二区在线看| 91精品国产91久久久久久青草| 性色AV一区二区三区无码| 五月天精品在线| 欧美一区二区三区成人片在线| 亚洲国产电影在线观看|