Food safety and reporters

0 CommentsPrint E-mail China Daily, June 16, 2011
Adjust font size:

At a sideline forum about food additives during the National Food Safety Publicity Week initiated on Monday, the official in charge under the Ministry of Health said that journalists whose inaccurate or distorted reporting of food safety problems mislead the public might be blacklisted.

The current food safety publicity week is meant to raise the general public's awareness about food safety so they will be clear-headed enough to avoid eating contaminated food or being misled by distorted reporting.

True, inaccurate or even distorted reporting of a particular event related to food safety may cause public panic or cause economic losses to the producer of a particular food or food-related products. Yet, the question remains whether it is necessary or legitimate to blacklist journalists.

If a journalist can be confirmed to have intentionally fabricated a report or deliberately distorted the facts, which then results in public panic or economic losses to a particular enterprise, the reporter concerned should be punished according to the law. There is no need to blacklist them.

To be frank, journalists have made a greater contribution to efforts to improve food safety and expose food scandals, such as melamine-contaminated milk and banned substances added to various foods, than the safety watchdogs that are supposed to oversee the nation's food chain.

A report of a study about investigative reporters by researchers from Hong Kong City University and Fudan University found that although there may be a few reporters who deliberately exaggerate their reports, the majority of investigative reporters are serious about their job and believe what they are doing is conducive to the well being of both the society and country.

Instead of pointing the finger at the minority of irresponsible journalists who produce inaccurate or distorted reporting, we should be protecting the majority of investigative reporters who have been sparing no efforts to probe and uncover illegal activities including the manufacturing of unsafe food.

When a great deal more still needs to be done to make watchdogs such as food safety testers, industrial and commercial administrative officers and food inspection and quarantine officers an effective mechanism to stop unsafe food from entering the market, reporters and even ordinary residents should be encouraged to report on any unsafe food activities they discover.

The National Food Safety Publicity Week is expected to be an annual activity, according to Food Safety Office of the State Council, but if it is truly meant to promote food safety, the role of reporters in probing food scandals should be highlighted in the campaign so they will get the support they are entitled to in their work.

Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comments

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 四虎在线永久视频观看| 国产精品久久久久一区二区三区 | 国产精品第100页| eeusswww电影天堂国| 成人妇女免费播放久久久| 久久久久亚洲精品男人的天堂 | 在异世界迷宫开后迷宫无修改版动漫 | 国产成人久久精品亚洲小说| 在线视频国产网址你懂的在线视频| 多人交换伦交视频| xxxxx日韩| 性欧美大战久久久久久久野外| 久久久久久国产精品免费免费| 日韩在线视频二区| 亚洲va在线va天堂成人| 欧美日本免费一区二区三区| 亚洲熟妇av一区二区三区宅男| 狠狠亚洲婷婷综合色香五月排名| 再深点灬舒服了灬太大了乡村| 美国式禁忌在完整有限中字| 国产xx在线观看| 草莓视频在线免费观看下载| 国产后入清纯学生妹| 黑人一区二区三区中文字幕| 国产欧美日韩中文字幕| 老色鬼久久综合第一| 国产精品欧美一区二区三区不卡| 91麻豆精品在线观看| 在线天堂中文www官网| 99精品小视频| 天堂avtt迅雷看看| a级毛片免费完整视频| 天天干天天操天天| www.99色| 夫醉酒被公侵犯的电影中字版 | 欧美日韩一区二区三区四区| 亚洲欧美日韩久久精品第一区| 欧美高清在线精品一区二区不卡| 亚洲精品成人a在线观看| 波多野结衣cesd—819高清| 亚洲精品无码久久久久|