Public response to tax law

0 CommentsPrint E-mail China Daily, June 1, 2011
Adjust font size:

As the National People's Congress (NPC), the top legislature, ended a month-long soliciting of public feedback on the draft amendment to the Personal Income Tax (PIT) Law on Tuesday, people are now concerned about whether or not the draft amendment will be adapted to reflect mainstream public opinion.

Since the draft amendment, which proposes the tax threshold be raised to 3,000 yuan ($460) a month from the current 2,000 yuan and the current nine brackets of the rating system be reduced to seven, was submitted to the top legislature in late April, the public has expressed unprecedented concerns. On the first day of its publication, the NPC received more than 100,000 responses and it had now collected more than 230,000, a record high for a single draft law.

In a move to further interact with the public, the NPC invited 16 public representatives on May 20 for face-to-face talks with relevant officials from its law and financial and economic affairs committees, the Ministry of Finance and the State Administration of Taxation, departments that all have a role in deciding the final amendment.

According to the NPC, some of the 16 representatives were directly selected from netizens on its website and some were recommended by the All-China Federation of Trade Unions and the State Administration of Taxation and thus, it said, they can better represent the voices of "different regions, different vocations and different groups".

According to media reports, "a majority" of the 16 representatives spoke in favor of the proposed 3,000-yuan tax threshold, which would be in serious contradiction to the general impression that a majority of the public disapproves with that threshold. It is counterintuitive to believe that so many people would take all the trouble to submit their opinions to the NPC just to express their endorsement for the proposed amendments.

Since it was made public on April 20, the draft amendment to the PIT Law has drawn fierce public criticism for failing to take enough steps toward reducing the tax burden on people, especially middle-income groups. The 1,000-yuan rise in the tax threshold is also believed to be a shortsighted move, given that such a small rise will soon be offset by the rising consumer price index (CPI).

In a recent poll conducted by the NetEase website portal of over 100 domestic economists, 69 percent think the 3,000-yuan tax threshold is still too low. There are also many people who regard the current tax system as too simple to effectively regulate the gap between the rich and the poor.

The active responses of the public no doubt represent progress in the country's democratic legislation. It is more than obvious that transparent assessment of these public opinions is vital to the legitimacy of new laws.

 

Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comments

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 色爱区综合激情五月综合激情| 乱中年女人伦av三区| 野花直播免费观看日本更新最新| 奇米影视7777狠狠狠狠色| 久久久精品波多野结衣| 欧美XXXX做受欧美1314| 亚洲欧美日韩一区| 狠狠色综合久久婷婷| 动漫人物将机机插曲3d版视频 | 免费国产在线观看| 老子影院午夜伦手机不四虎| 国产午夜视频在线观看| 国产福利你懂的| 国产精品久久久久久福利| 99re在线这里只有精品| 女朋友韩国电影免费完整版| 两个人看的视频www在线高清| 最近最好的中文字幕2019免费| 免费人成在线观看视频播放| 老师你的兔子好软水好多作文高清 | 免费看一级做a爰片久久| 美女扒开尿口给男人桶视频免费| 国产特级毛片aaaaaa高清| 2021精品国产品免费观看| 国产高清在线观看麻豆| aaa国产一级毛片| 天天插天天操天天射| javaparser日本高清| 好男人好资源在线观看免费播放高清| 久久婷婷电影网| 日韩精品一卡二卡三卡四卡2021| 亚洲欧美日韩在线一区| 熟女老女人的网站| 人妻老妇乱子伦精品无码专区| 菠萝蜜网站入口| 国产大学生粉嫩无套流白浆| 黄网站欧美内射| 国产另类在线观看| 韩国r级2020年最新| 国产伦子沙发午休| 被农民工玩的校花雯雯|