The World Trade Organization's (WTO) trade talks, known as the Doha Development Round, are in crisis. The differences among key countries are so wide that they appear to be "unbridgeable". This became evident from the WTO's latest 600-plus-page report, which was issued last month.

At a meeting on April 29, WTO member states agreed to try again in May to find a political solution, so that a deal could be struck by the end of this year.

The deep impasse has not been caused by technical issues alone. There is a clash of paradigms, too.

Developing countries want to stay true to the development objectives of the Doha Round. Doha started as a "development agenda" and the pledge that developing countries' interests would occupy center stage. The round was supposed to correct the imbalances in many WTO's rules.

But rich countries have given the developmental aspects a not so silent burial. Instead, they have made opening up developing countries' markets the main aim of the talks, while using the many loopholes to escape serious obligations of their own. Needless to say, they have mainly succeeded in this, as can be seen from the WTO report issued in April.

According to the report, developed countries would be allowed to continue granting high subsidies to their agriculture sectors. The only change would be in name and type. They'd be allowed to shelter their "sensitive products" from steep tariff cuts, too.

In contrast, developing countries would have to cut their farm tariffs more steeply (by up to 36 percent on average) than they did during the Uruguay Round (24 percent on average). While they'd be allowed to have a new special safeguard mechanism aimed at avoiding rapid increase in imports that could damage local farm productions, the proposed mechanism would be difficult to use and of very limited benefit.

Worse is the proposed text on industrial tariff cuts. Under a specific formula, developing countries would have to cut their bound tariffs on industrial products very steeply. The developing countries hurt by the formula would end up with average applied tariffs of 11-12 percent and thus risk cheap imports damaging their domestic industries.