Harsh penalty on welfare house cheating

0 CommentsPrint E-mail China Daily, April 26, 2011
Adjust font size:

The governing capability of a govern-ment is put to the test when it comes to the question of whether social welfare housing can really benefit those in need.

This is not to say that those who cheat are not to blame for the rampant fraud in applications for both low-rent housing and affordable housing, and of course, anyone found to have provided false information to obtain such social welfare housing should be severely punished.

But what really matters is whether a system can be developed that will make it very difficult or almost impossible for applicants to cheat.

In the latest development, Shenzhen city government has amended its regulations about social welfare housing, which it introduced less than a year ago. The amended rules, which will be deliberated by the standing committee of its municipal people's congress on Thursday, has raised the fine for those caught cheating from the previous 5,000 yuan to at least 30,000 yuan and up to a maximum of 200,000 yuan.

But what may really act as a deterrent is that those caught cheating may be brought to court charged with committing fraud.

In the past 10 months, there have been a series of scandals involving unqualified applicants applying for low-rent or affordable houses. In the most prominent one, among the names of those who were examined and approved as qualifying for a social welfare house were those who already possessed luxury houses.

It is likely that some potential well-off cheats will give up applying as they will now consider it too risky to get a welfare apartment.

Yet, whether the severe penalties will really work depends on how many of those who cheat can be brought to justice. And that depends on whether the government can design an efficient system and whether government employees are capable of making the system operate exactly as it should.

If few cheats can be caught the severe penalties will be useless.

Which brings us back to the question: Why can't the government introduce an application system designed well enough and operated correctly so that it is impossible for unqualified applicants to apply for welfare housing?

Of course, the efforts by Shenzhen municipal government in this regard are worth encouragement. And its earnestness in trying to do a good job should not be questioned.

Bu what really matters is that efforts should be made in the right place - to design a better system and make sure it works exactly as it should. After all, it is a matter of governing capability.

Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comments

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 亚洲欧美在线看| 国产一区二区三区精品久久呦| a毛看片免费观看视频| 成年午夜无码av片在线观看 | 天天干天天操天天| 中文字幕99页| 无码成人AAAAA毛片| 久久天天躁狠狠躁夜夜网站| 极品粉嫩嫩模大尺度无码视频| 亚洲欧美一区二区成人片| 燃情仕途小说全文阅读免费无弹窗下载| 午夜精品久久久久久久99热 | 精品人妻VA出轨中文字幕| 四虎成人精品无码| 色综合久久中文字幕网| 国产午夜爽爽窝窝在线观看| 好吊色永久免费视频大全| 国产精品久久久久9999赢消| 521a成v视频网站在线入口| 在公交车上被站着被c| sss在线观看免费高清| 小丑joker在线观看完整版高清 | 钻胯羞辱的视频vk| 国产在线精品国自产拍影院同性| 精品丝袜国产自在线拍亚洲| 国产精品va在线观看手机版| 2021国产精品久久| 国产精品视频无圣光一区| 91精品免费高清在线| 国产麻豆天美果冻无码视频| 99久久免费国产精精品| 在线视频1卡二卡三卡| avtom影院入口永久在线app| 天天狠天天透天干天天怕∴| jlzzjlzz亚洲乱熟在线播放| 女子初尝黑人巨嗷嗷叫| √最新版天堂资源网在线| 妞干网在线免费观看| xxxx69hd老师| 天天综合网久久| ass美女下部精品图片|