Harsh penalty on welfare house cheating

0 CommentsPrint E-mail China Daily, April 26, 2011
Adjust font size:

The governing capability of a govern-ment is put to the test when it comes to the question of whether social welfare housing can really benefit those in need.

This is not to say that those who cheat are not to blame for the rampant fraud in applications for both low-rent housing and affordable housing, and of course, anyone found to have provided false information to obtain such social welfare housing should be severely punished.

But what really matters is whether a system can be developed that will make it very difficult or almost impossible for applicants to cheat.

In the latest development, Shenzhen city government has amended its regulations about social welfare housing, which it introduced less than a year ago. The amended rules, which will be deliberated by the standing committee of its municipal people's congress on Thursday, has raised the fine for those caught cheating from the previous 5,000 yuan to at least 30,000 yuan and up to a maximum of 200,000 yuan.

But what may really act as a deterrent is that those caught cheating may be brought to court charged with committing fraud.

In the past 10 months, there have been a series of scandals involving unqualified applicants applying for low-rent or affordable houses. In the most prominent one, among the names of those who were examined and approved as qualifying for a social welfare house were those who already possessed luxury houses.

It is likely that some potential well-off cheats will give up applying as they will now consider it too risky to get a welfare apartment.

Yet, whether the severe penalties will really work depends on how many of those who cheat can be brought to justice. And that depends on whether the government can design an efficient system and whether government employees are capable of making the system operate exactly as it should.

If few cheats can be caught the severe penalties will be useless.

Which brings us back to the question: Why can't the government introduce an application system designed well enough and operated correctly so that it is impossible for unqualified applicants to apply for welfare housing?

Of course, the efforts by Shenzhen municipal government in this regard are worth encouragement. And its earnestness in trying to do a good job should not be questioned.

Bu what really matters is that efforts should be made in the right place - to design a better system and make sure it works exactly as it should. After all, it is a matter of governing capability.

Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comments

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 中文字幕第38页永久乱码| 亚洲国产婷婷综合在线精品| 荫蒂添的好舒服视频| 国产男女猛烈无遮挡免费网站 | h片在线观看免费| 国语高清精品一区二区三区| www.精品视频| 性猛交xxxxx按摩中国| 久久99精品久久只有精品| 日韩精品亚洲人成在线观看| 亚洲国产成人久久三区| 正在播放宾馆露脸对白视频| 人妻少妇看a偷人无码精品| 精品国产v无码大片在线观看| 国产三级av在线播放| 韩国一级做a爱性色毛片| 国产成人免费在线观看| 五月天婷婷精品视频| 国产精品无码dvd在线观看| 97天天摸天天碰天天爽| 夜色福利久久久久久777777| juy639黑人教练君岛美绪| 小丑joker在线观看完整版高清 | 一区二区三区在线免费看 | 精品日韩欧美国产一区二区| 国产AV无码专区亚洲AV| 草莓视频未满十八勿网站| 国产公开免费人成视频| 高跟丝袜美女一级毛片| 国产女主播福利在线| 黄色网址免费大全| 国产性夜夜春夜夜爽| 黄视频免费下载| 国产欧美在线观看视频| 五月婷婷丁香六月| 国产欧美另类久久精品蜜芽| 波多野结衣xfplay在线观看| 国产精品久久久久9999| aⅴ免费在线观看| 国产精品va一区二区三区| 亚洲欧美自拍明星换脸|