Hydropower remains cleanest solution to rural regions

By Zhang Boting
0 CommentsPrint E-mail Global Times, February 18, 2011
Adjust font size:

[By Liu Rui/Global Times]



Recently an official at the Ministry of Environment Protection claimed that hydroelectric stations might be more environmentally damaging than conventional thermal power stations.

This reflects a narrow and biased view.

At present the governmental regulations on reducing pollution only examines sulfur dioxide and chemical oxygen demand (COD), a measurement of organic pollutant. It is believed that the building of dams would slow down water flow, exacerbate COD data and cause algae bloom.

But it's not true that slowing the water flow would definitely threaten the water environment. For one thing, it would be much easier for suspended solids to be deposited through sedimentation. For another, slowing the water flow would be much more environmentally sensitive. Industrial pollution would result in much more serious hazards than before. This would force local governments to harshly eliminate those small polluting businesses and build more sewage treatment plants.

As for other ecological concerns, the amount of fish has been continuously declining regardless of dam construction.

Changes in waterways may exert a short-term impact but in long run fish can adapt to the new environment. Overfishing and pollution cause much more damage to marine life than dams.

Dams and reservoirs are actually reducing the risk of geological catastrophes. By slowing down the water flow, rocks along rivers would be less corroded and landslide would also become less likely.

Some fanatic environmentalists misled the public and pressed for irrational policies. Fortunately their techniques don't always prevail. Now policymaking increasingly respects scientific analysis rather than media hype and environmentalists' emotions. Nevertheless, some stubborn environmental fundamentalists, still can influence the public understanding.

Their persistence is explained by how Chinese environmentalist groups work. Most environmentalists receive funding from NGOs, and in return they must present convincing reports about how bad the environment is and how courageously they are fighting against the polluting tycoons.

1   2   Next  


Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comments

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 九歌电影免费全集在线观看 | 国产李美静大战黑人| 99久久国产热无码精品免费| 性刺激久久久久久久久| 久久AV无码精品人妻出轨| 日韩欧美一区二区三区视频| 亚洲伊人久久大香线焦| 欧美野外疯狂做受xxxx高潮| 俄罗斯精品bbw| а√最新版在线天堂| 拧花蒂尿用力按凸起喷水尿| 久久精品国产亚洲一区二区| 欧美aa在线观看| 亚洲国产精品久久久久久| 毛片a级毛片免费观看品善网| 免费毛片a线观看| 精品国产精品久久一区免费式| 国产suv精品一区二区6| 青青青国产手机在线播放| 国产成人精品视频播放| 日本免费www| 国产第一页屁屁影院| 2019中文字幕免费电影在线播放| 国精品无码一区二区三区在线| avhd101av高清迷片在线| 好妈妈5韩国电影高清中字| 一级做a爰片性色毛片新版的| 成人年无码av片在线观看| 中文字幕在线最新在线不卡 | 蜜桃视频一区二区三区在线观看| 国产在线视频一区二区三区| 国产高清小视频| 国产欧美va欧美va香蕉在| h无遮挡男女激烈动态图| 国产精品久久国产精麻豆99网站 | 日本亚洲精品色婷婷在线影院| 久久精品中文字幕第一页| 日韩电影中文字幕在线观看| 乱中年女人伦av一区二区| 明星造梦一区二区| 久草免费手机视频|