Defining boundaries for diplomatic confidentiality

0 CommentsPrint E-mail Global Times, November 30, 2010
Adjust font size:

WikiLeaks might drag the world into a kind of transparency before it is ready for it.

Last week, the website declared it would publish, in the next few days, around 3 million confidential US documents that are expected to harm US interests and its relationship with its allies.

On Monday, it fulfilled its promise by revealing details of US diplomacy and candid, if not too candid, assessments of US diplomats.

The released documents indicate that US diplomats' behavior and their comments have probably exceeded what can be expected of responsible diplomats, which consequently embarrassed the US government and its allies.

According to one of the released documents, the US government is undertaking a secret intelligence campaign to obtain detailed biometric information on key UN officials, which include undersecretaries, heads of specialized agencies and their chief advisers.

What's more embarrassing might be the blunt comments on world leaders. In cables written by US diplomats, Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin is described as an "alpha-dog," Afghan President Hamid Karzai is "driven by paranoia," and German Chancellor Angela Merkel allegedly "avoids risk and is rarely creative."

The exposure reveals a mix-up between the proper role and behavior of US diplomats and raises questions about the legality of their practices. But where is the boundary of diplomatic confidentiality?

It is amazing the public has so much access to government documents and communiqués. However, diplomatic activities sometimes are not supposed to be fully exhibited before the public.

Diplomacy is subtle and involves rational analysis and decision-making based on overall national interests. But public opinion is usually emotional and sentimental.

Public knowledge of intimate diplomatic relations can shape public opinion negatively about world events or other countries. This information can then influence or bring pressure to diplomatic policies and affect normal diplomatic procedures.

Earlier this month, a leaked video circulated on the Internet showing the crash between a Chinese fishing boat and Japanese coastguard vessels. The leak increased the complexity of the situation, which was already a diplomatic hot button between China and Japan.

The Internet has made it easy to release and divulge confidential information. The pros and cons of releasing confidential diplomatic documents should be well considered.

Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comments

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 五月天丁香久久| 免费在线观看污网站| 在线观看精品视频看看播放| 男女午夜性刺激| 欧美无遮挡国产欧美另类| 国产狂喷潮在线观看在线观看| 91香蕉视频污污| 女同久久另类99精品国产 | 暖暖免费高清日本韩国视频| 亚洲欧美成aⅴ人在线观看| 男女一边摸一边爽爽视频| 午夜影视免费完整高清在线观看网站 | 99久热任我爽精品视频| 国产精品国产三级国产专不∫| 99久久国产综合精品1尤物| 好爽好多水好得真紧| 一本大道香蕉高清视频视频| 成人精品国产亚洲欧洲| 久久99精品国产99久久6男男| 日本高清H色视频在线观看| 久久综合国产乱子伦精品免费| 欧美亚洲综合在线观看| 亚洲天天做日日做天天看| 欧美精品一区二区三区在线| 亚洲精品国产啊女成拍色拍| 狠狠噜天天噜日日噜视频麻豆| 免费国产在线观看老王影院| 精品一区二区三区视频| 午夜人妻久久久久久久久| 给我看播放片免费高清| 和僧侣的交行之夜樱花| 老司机亚洲精品影视www| 国产91精品久久久久999| 色天使色婷婷丁香久久综合| 国产一国产一级毛片视频在线 | 波多野结衣欲乱| 免费a在线观看| 男女混合的群应该取什么名字| 免费人成黄页在线观看视频国产| 男女一边摸一边做爽爽毛片| 免费国产真实迷j在线观看|