BRIC a convenient illusion, not a lasting alliance

By Oliver Stuenkel
0 CommentsPrint E-mail Global Times, November 16, 2010
Adjust font size:

 

The BRICs were different. Since O'Neill only looked at economics and never intended to devise a political alliance when he created the term, the countries he chose were very heterogeneous. Brazil and India are two democracies that are not yet fully established in today's order, while China and Russia have been established powers since 1945.

The four disagree on virtually everything, including trade, climate change, human rights, and the reform of global governance.

Despite all this, the BRICs turned into a household term among international policy- makers. Their leaders begun to refer to themselves as "BRIC members" and agreed that they needed to strengthen "intra-BRIC" ties.

In 2009 President Lula, President Medvedev, Prime Minister Singh and President Hu Jintao met for a BRIC summit in St. Petersburg. A second BRIC summit followed in April 2010 in Brasília.

Yet after initial optimism during negotiations and grand announcements about a "new world order," the BRIC members realized that their positions were too far apart to agree on any specific measures.

The BRICs' discontent with the system and claim for a greater say, their revisionist rhetoric, the vagueness about what should be changed and their eventually reluctant acknowledgement that the system is fundamentally sound showed that reality is more complicated than fiction, and that O'Neill's category is too broad to be meaningful.

What the success of the BRIC label really showed was that scholars and investors are not the only ones who search for a category that can capture reality. Heads of state long for a meaningful way to understand the world as well. The four leaders essentially met in St. Petersburg to try on the category O'Neill had devised for them.

Rather than pointing to their similarities, their behavior reflected their strong desire to comprehend which category they themselves belong to.

In a rapidly changing world were the traditional parameters of East vs. West, North vs. South and rich vs. poor no longer provide any guidance for rising powers, trying on the "BRIC hat" was merely another episode, yet certainly not the last, in their complex search for their identity and place in a world they will soon rule.

The author is a visiting professor of International Relations at the University of S?o Paulo. He writes about emerging powers at www.postwesternworld.com. viewpoint@globaltimes.com.cn

   Previous   1   2  


Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comments

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产手机在线αⅴ片无码观看| 男女乱婬真视频| 国产精品成人不卡在线观看| 久久国产精品久久国产精品| 欧美成人午夜片一一在线观看| 任你躁国产自任一区二区三区| 黄色三级理沦片| 国产精品久久精品视| 一级做a爰片久久毛片免费看| 日本全黄三级在线观看| 亚洲精品成人片在线观看精品字幕 | 欧美成人性色区| 亚洲综合一区无码精品| 被黑人侵犯若妻中文字幕| 国产欧美视频在线| 13一14sex破| 国产馆在线观看| 99热国产在线观看| 女女女女BBBBBB毛片在线| 中文字幕校园春色| 欧美一级片观看| 免费一级毛片在线视频观看| 精品日韩亚洲AV无码一区二区三区| 国产精品久久久久9999| 99在线精品视频在线观看| 女人18毛片a级毛片免费视频| 久久国产精品99精品国产| 最新视频-88av| 亚洲精品日韩中文字幕久久久| 男女性潮高清免费网站| 全彩本子里番调教仆人| 精品国产污污免费网站入口| 啊灬啊别停灬用力啊动视频| 色综合久久综合网观看| 国产精品久久久久免费a∨| 69视频在线观看高清免费| 国产麻豆流白浆在线观看| 99久久免费精品国产72精品九九| 天堂mv在线免费播放| 99视频免费在线观看| 成人午夜精品视频在线观看|