BRIC a convenient illusion, not a lasting alliance

By Oliver Stuenkel
0 CommentsPrint E-mail Global Times, November 16, 2010
Adjust font size:

 

The BRICs were different. Since O'Neill only looked at economics and never intended to devise a political alliance when he created the term, the countries he chose were very heterogeneous. Brazil and India are two democracies that are not yet fully established in today's order, while China and Russia have been established powers since 1945.

The four disagree on virtually everything, including trade, climate change, human rights, and the reform of global governance.

Despite all this, the BRICs turned into a household term among international policy- makers. Their leaders begun to refer to themselves as "BRIC members" and agreed that they needed to strengthen "intra-BRIC" ties.

In 2009 President Lula, President Medvedev, Prime Minister Singh and President Hu Jintao met for a BRIC summit in St. Petersburg. A second BRIC summit followed in April 2010 in Brasília.

Yet after initial optimism during negotiations and grand announcements about a "new world order," the BRIC members realized that their positions were too far apart to agree on any specific measures.

The BRICs' discontent with the system and claim for a greater say, their revisionist rhetoric, the vagueness about what should be changed and their eventually reluctant acknowledgement that the system is fundamentally sound showed that reality is more complicated than fiction, and that O'Neill's category is too broad to be meaningful.

What the success of the BRIC label really showed was that scholars and investors are not the only ones who search for a category that can capture reality. Heads of state long for a meaningful way to understand the world as well. The four leaders essentially met in St. Petersburg to try on the category O'Neill had devised for them.

Rather than pointing to their similarities, their behavior reflected their strong desire to comprehend which category they themselves belong to.

In a rapidly changing world were the traditional parameters of East vs. West, North vs. South and rich vs. poor no longer provide any guidance for rising powers, trying on the "BRIC hat" was merely another episode, yet certainly not the last, in their complex search for their identity and place in a world they will soon rule.

The author is a visiting professor of International Relations at the University of S?o Paulo. He writes about emerging powers at www.postwesternworld.com. viewpoint@globaltimes.com.cn

   Previous   1   2  


Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comments

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 四虎成人国产精品视频| 51久久夜色精品国产| 韩国五感图r级无删减版| 日韩欧美第一区二区三区| 免费看黄的网页| 亚洲www视频| 强行交换配乱婬bd| 亚洲AV无码国产一区二区三区 | 又黄又爽免费视频| h片在线免费观看| 女人是男人的未来1分29分| 久久婷婷五月综合97色一本一本| 琪琪色原网站在线观看| 国产人妖ts在线观看网站| 911亚洲精品| 成人久久伊人精品伊人| 亚洲av无码一区二区三区观看 | 动漫裸男露ji无遮挡网站| 国产免费女女脚奴视频网| 在线视频一二三区| 中文字幕精品无码亚洲字| 欧美一卡2卡3卡4卡公司 | 人人妻人人澡人人爽人人dvd| 蜜桃97爱成人| 国产精品一区二区久久国产| selao久久国产精品| 日本三级黄色片网站| 亚洲国产精品尤物yw在线观看| 精品国产不卡一区二区三区| 国产成人av乱码在线观看| 91福利一区二区| 少妇AV射精精品蜜桃专区| 久久人人爽人人爽人人av东京热 | 色欲久久久天天天综合网精品| 国产精品久久久福利| jizz日本在线播放| 妖精视频一区二区三区| 久久99精品久久久久久综合 | 国产一级黄色片子| 国产你懂的在线观看| 国产熟睡乱子伦视频观看软件|