Undemocratic National Parks

By Angus Macmillan
0 CommentsPrint E-mail China.org.cn, November 12, 2010
Adjust font size:

Dear Sirs

I was interested to hear David Cameron preaching democracy to the Chinese people today.

Perhaps he should preach it to the Scottish Government in the UK.

In the year 2009, eleven years after devolution in Scotland, the Scottish Parliament introduced a consultation document under the National Parks (Scotland) Act 2000 which continues to discriminate against those residing in the Loch Lomond and the Trossachs areas by proposing nothing that reduces a substantial amount of power from the elected local authorities and placing it in the hands of National Park Authorities (NPAs) which are non-departmental public bodies (NDPBs) responsible to central government.

This proposal continues the anomaly that those residing within national park boundaries do not enjoy the same level of local democracy as elsewhere in the country, as the 17 NPA board members dominated by central government appointees and board member electees, "must work together with the purpose, as set out in the Act [section 9 (1)], of ensuring that the National Park aims are collectively achieved in relation to the National Park in a coordinated way".

The suggested political structure of NPA Boards is:

(a) 6 central government appointees.

(b) 6 further central government appointees nominated by local councils that have at least part of a ward within the national park boundaries.

The nominated members shall be nominated as follows;

? two members (including one local member) to be nominated by Argyll and Bute Council

? two members (including one local member) to be nominated by Stirling

Council

? one member nominated by West Dunbartonshire Council

? one member nominated by Perth & Kinross Council

These nominated board members are generally, but not necessarily, local councillors who have been elected on mainstream issues but who are required to represent their electorate differently, depending whether or not their voters reside within the national parks. They are also entitled to make decisions that affect constituencies in which they do not reside or represent.

(c) 5 board member electees who are solely concerned with national park issues. This is passed off as "democracy" but there is a world of a difference between electing local councilors on the wide political front and board members "electees" of quangos with a single-issue remit.

Under this proposal, planning applications will still be determined by board members who must work together to ensure that the national park aims are collectively achieved. Board members who are councilors elected on mainstream politics will require to make different decisions depending on whether their constituents do or do not reside within national park boundaries.

The question that no politician will answer is:

Why are those who live within the boundaries of national parks in Scotland not entitled to the same level of local democracy as elsewhere in the country?

The National Parks (Scotland) Act 2000 is an act of discrimination against a minority of the population based on where they reside.

Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comments

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产精品自产拍在线网站| 无码aⅴ精品一区二区三区| 亚洲第一极品精品无码久久| 美国农夫激情在线综合| 国产卡1卡2卡三卡在线| 亚洲精品亚洲人成在线播放| 国产美女无遮挡免费视频网站| fc2ppv在线观看| 忘忧草www日本| 中文字幕无码中文字幕有码| 日本特黄特黄刺激大片| 久久综合88熟人妻| 欧美aaaaaa级午夜福利视频| 亚洲欧洲日产国码av系列天堂 | 亚洲精品tv久久久久久久久| 窈窕淑女在线观看免费韩剧| 另类视频第一页| 色吊丝永久性观看网站大全| 国产又黄又大又粗的视频| 国产v片成人影院在线观看| 国产真人无遮挡作爱免费视频| 18禁止午夜福利体验区| 国产美女无遮挡免费视频网站| 999zyz色资源站在线观看| 大片免费观看在线视频| chinese乱子伦xxxx国语对白| 婷婷五月综合色中文字幕| 三级伦理在线播放| 成人妇女免费播放久久久| 中文字幕精品无码一区二区三区 | 色播在线观看免费| 国产亚洲人成网站观看| 适合男士深夜看的小说软件| 国产免费怕怕免费视频观看| 香港一级毛片免费看| 国产午夜精品一区二区| 香蕉97超级碰碰碰碰碰久| 国产大秀视频在线一区二区| 麻豆精品传媒成人精品| 国产在线观看91精品一区| 高清欧美性猛交xxxx黑人猛交|