Income gap, a woe for China and US

By Chen Weihua
0 CommentsPrint E-mail China Daily, October 12, 2010
Adjust font size:

The United States and China have found something in common lately, after the US Census Bureau announced that last year the income gap between the richest and poorest US citizens was the widest in recent history.

The top-earning 20 percent in the US, those making more than $100,000 a year, received 49.4 percent of all the income generated in the US, compared with the 3.4 percent received by those 14.3 percent Americans below the poverty line.

The ratio of 14.5-to-1 makes the US the country with the largest income gap in the Western industrialized world and represents a growing trend, as the ratio was 13.6 in 2008 and 7.69 in 1968.

The number of people falling below the poverty line last year was also the largest since the US Census started tracking poverty 51 years ago. About 14.3 percent, or 44 million Americans, were living below the poverty line in 2009.

With no quick economic recovery in sight, many fear these trends will continue in the coming years.

In China, the swiftly widening income gap has time and again sounded alarm. World Bank Chief Economist Justin Yifu Lin has warned that narrowing the income gap is the biggest challenge facing the country.

The current Gini coefficient of inequality in China is 0.47, its highest in the last 60 years. When China began its reform and opening-up in 1978 the Gini ratio was just 0.18 percent. The income disparity has widened along with its breakneck economic growth.

The top 1 percent of Chinese families now own 41.4 percent of the wealth, a figure similar to that in the US, where the top 1 percent control 40 percent of all the country's wealth.

In both countries, this extreme concentration of wealth and income is accused of hurting the economies.

Robert Reich, former US labor secretary and now a professor at University of California Berkeley, argued at a recent event to promote his new book, Aftershock: The next economy and America's future, that if a larger percentage of the people shared a bigger portion of the nation's wealth it would help generate more jobs and more economic growth.

The same argument was made by Li Peilin, head of the Institute of Sociology at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences who attributed China's low domestic consumption to uneven income distribution. The spending power of middle and low income families is limited by the higher percentage of income spent on education and medical care, while the rich are investing much of their money in real estate, fuelling the housing bubble.

Though the causes for the huge income gap in the largest developed country and the largest developing country differ, the two countries have seen the same growing anger among the public.

In the US, the widening income gap last year was fuelled by the high unemployment rate, a struggling property market and shrinking but persistent debts, all of which hit low income families the hardest, and the rally of stocks and other securities, which benefited the wealthy. In China, the blame is placed on the decades-long rural and urban divide. Rural Chinese are left far behind in sharing the economic boom.

Among the urbanites, people accuse those working in monopoly industries, such as electric power, telecom, petrochemical, finance and tobacco for grabbing an unfair share of the nation's income. There is equal fury at profiteering industries such as real estate and mining. Of the 400 richest Chinese on the 2009 Forbes list, 154 were in the real estate sector.

In his study, Wang Xiaolu, deputy director of the China National Economic Research Institute of the China Reform Foundation, found that the top 10 percent of families have 65 times more per capita income than the bottom 10 percent, nearly three times the official statistics. The figures, still debated by some, have nevertheless provided a clue to the rampant rent-seeking activities in the country.

China and the US are becoming more like each other in the inequities of society. Narrowing the income gaps would not only air their economic recoveries, but also bring social justice to their societies that are increasingly torn apart.

The author is China Daily's chief correspondent in New York. He can be reached at chenweihua@chinadaily.com.cn

Print E-mail Bookmark and Share

Go to Forum >>0 Comments

No comments.

Add your comments...

  • User Name Required
  • Your Comment
  • Racist, abusive and off-topic comments may be removed by the moderator.
Send your storiesGet more from China.org.cnMobileRSSNewsletter
主站蜘蛛池模板: 国产乱子伦精品视频| 香蕉视频好色先生| 青青草视频成人| 看黄软件免费看在线观看| 欧美一日本频道一区二区三区| 日日碰狠狠添天天爽无码| 在线A级毛片无码免费真人| 国产成人精品免费视频软件| 免费看毛片电影| 亚洲AV无码一区二区二三区软件| 中国一级毛片视频免费看| 香蕉免费在线视频| 精品无码成人片一区二区98| 欧美变态老妇重口与另类| 成年18网站免费视频网站| 国产精品午夜电影| 免费福利小视频| 久久精品卫校国产小美女| 99国产精品欧美一区二区三区 | **一级毛片在线直播| 精品亚洲成a人片在线观看| 日韩精品中文乱码在线观看| 在线观看国产一区二区三区| 国产一区二区在线观看麻豆| 亚洲人成网站色7799| reikokobayakawatube| 色狠狠一区二区三区香蕉| 欧美性猛交xxxx乱大交蜜桃| 嫩的都出水了18p| 国产亚洲精品bt天堂精选| 亚洲午夜一区二区电影院| wtfpass欧美极品angelica| 色釉釉www网址| 最近中文字幕免费mv视频7| 在线观看国产精美视频| 可以免费观看的一级毛片| 久久影院最新消息| 波多野结衣xfplay在线观看| 海角社区视频在线| 婷婷色香五月综合激激情| 国产一区二区三区精品久久呦|